A Comparison of Two-Phase Inflow Performance Relationships

Author(s):  
Frederic Gallice ◽  
Michael L. Wiggins
Keyword(s):  
2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (02) ◽  
pp. 100-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic Gallice ◽  
Michael L. Wiggins
Keyword(s):  

1983 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 164
Author(s):  
M. David Agostini

The North Rankin gas field discovered in 1971, has been evaluated by a series of appraisal wells and refinement of this is underway through the use of a 3D seismic survey. Extensive production testing on two wells was used to establish reservoir fluid characteristics, inflow performance and to predict reservoir behaviour.The North Rankin 'A' platform has been constructed of a standard steel jacket design. Components of the structure were built in Japan, Singapore, Geraldton, Jervoise Bay and Adelaide. Provision exists for 34 wells to be drilled from the structure to exploit the southern end of the North Rankin field.Simultaneous drilling and producing activities are planned, requiring well survey and deviation control techniques that will provide a high level of confidence. Wells will be completed using 7 inch tubing, fire resistant christmas trees, and are designed to be produced at about 87 MMSCFD on a continuous basis. Process equipment on this platform is designed to handle 1200 MMSCFD and is intended primarily to dry the gas and condensate and to transfer gas and liquid to shore in a two phase 40 inch pipeline. The maintenance of offshore equipment is being planned to maximise the ratio between planned and unplanned work.The commencement of drilling activities is planned for mid 1983, with commissioning of process equipment occurring in the second quarter of 198 The North Rankin 'A' platform will initially supply the WA market at some 400 MMSCFD offshore gas rate, requiring 7 wells. The start of LNG exports is planned for April 1987. The intial gas for this will be derived from the North Rankin 'A' platform.


2002 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew K. Wojtanowicz ◽  
Ephim I. Shirman

Dual-completed wells with Downhole Water Sink (DWS) are used for water coning control in oil reservoirs with bottom water drive. In DWS wells, the second (bottom) completion—placed in the water column—is used for draining water. This prevents the water cone invasion and allows free oil inflow in the top completion. The decision on using DWS or a conventional (single-completed) well is based upon deliverability comparison of the two wells. This paper shows how to describe DWS well deliverability in terms of the top and bottom production rates, water cut, and pressure drawdown. Also, the effect of pressure interference between two well completions on deliverability limits has been studied and qualified experimentally. DWS well deliverability depends on two variables, pressure drawdown and water drainage rate, and is described by a three-dimensional Inflow Performance Domain (IPD). Visual-Basic software based on a new analytical model of IPD has been developed to calculate critical (fluid breakthrough) rates for oil and water. The critical rates identify inflow conditions to the well’s completions—single or two-phase inflow. Also calculated are the values of water cut and maximum pressure drawdown at the well. An example demonstrates the procedure and a complete IPD plot. The experimental study, using a Hele-Shaw physical model of DWS well, demonstrates the reduction of well’s deliverability caused by pressure interference from the second (bottom) completion. The experiments have shown, however, that the deliverability decrease is small and over-compensated by the increase of oil rate due to simultaneous reduction of water cut.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Hua Tan ◽  
Jian-Yi Liu ◽  
Jia-Hui Zhao ◽  
Xiao-Ping Li ◽  
Guang-Dong Zhang ◽  
...  

During the development of water drive gas reservoirs, the phenomena of gas escaping from water and water separating out from gas will change the seepage characteristics of formation fluid. Therefore, the traditional gas-water two-phase inflow performance relationship (IPR) models are not suitable for calculating the water producing gas well inflow performance relationship in water drive gas reservoirs. Based on the basic theory of fluid mechanics in porous medium, using the principle of mass conservation, and considering the process of dissolution and volatilization of gas and water formation, this paper establishes a new mathematical model of gas-water two-phase flow. Multiobjective optimization method is used to automatically match the sample well production data in water drive gas reservoirs and then we can achieve the sample well’s productivity equation, relative permeability curve, water influx intensity, and single well controlled reserves. In addition, the influence of different production gas water ratios (GWR) and gas-soluble water coefficients on absolute open flow rate (qAOF) is discussed. This method remedied the limitation of well testing on site and was considered to be a new way to analyze the production behaviors in water producing gas well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document