An Investigation of Proppant Transport in Friction Reducer Fluid Systems Utilizing a Large Slot Flow Apparatus

Author(s):  
Stephen Drylie ◽  
Robert Duenckel ◽  
Robert Barree ◽  
Barry Hlidek
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Xu ◽  
James Ogle ◽  
Todd Collier ◽  
Ian Straffin ◽  
Teddy Dubois ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Al-Hulail ◽  
Oscar Arauji ◽  
Ali AlZaki ◽  
Mohamed Zeghouani

Abstract Proppant placement in a tight formation is extremely challenging. Therefore, using a high viscous friction reducer (HVFR) as a fracturing fluid for stimulation treatment in tight gas reservoirs is increasing within the industry because it can transport proppant, help reduce pipe friction generated during hydraulic-fracturing treatments, and efficiently clean up similar to the lower viscosity friction reducers (FRs). In this paper the implementation of the robust HVFR that is building higher viscosity at low concentrations, which minimizes energy loss and promotes turbulent flow within the pipe during the pumping of low viscosity, is discussed in detail. Performance evaluation of the new HVFR was conducted in the laboratory and compared to the lower viscosity FR. The study consisted of viscosity measurements at 70 and 180°F, compatibility with other additives, and proppant transport capabilities. Additionally, the viscosity generated from both FRs was compared using two water sources: water well A and treated sewage water. Viscosity measurements were performed across a wide range of FR and HVFR concentrations and under varying shear rates using a digital viscometer. To validate drag reduction capabilities for this HVFR in the field, the same groundwater with low salinity and low total dissolved solids (TDS) content were used for comparison purposes. The test plan for this new HVFR was for a well to be drilled to a total depth of 17,801 ft MD (10,693 ft TVD) with a 6,016-ft lateral section. Another part of the plan was to complete 41 stages—the first stage with the toe initiator, and subsequent stages using ball drops until Stage 8, were completed using the current FR. For Stage 8, the drag reduction from the new HVFR was evaluated against the current FR only during the pad stage. Then, FR or HVFR concentrations were used, with a gradual reduction from 2 to 1 gpt without compromising proppant placement from stages 9 to 37, alternating current FR and the new HVFR every four stages. From Stage 38 to 41, the same approach was used but with treated sewage water and alternating every other stage using current FR or HVFR at 1gpt. The implementation of the new HVFR showed better friction reduction when using the same concentration of the current FR. Also, achieving better average treating pressures with lower concentration. Based on that it is a cost-effective solution and the performance is better, this lead to reduce the HVFR volume to be pumped per stage compared to the current FR. Applications/Significance/Novelty For this study, drag reduction capabilities for this new HVFR were validated in the field at higher pumping rate conditions, potentially optimizing (reducing) the polymer concentration during a freshwater application. It was shown that lower concentrations of this HVFR provided higher viscosity, which helps improve proppant transport and operation placement.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Ashtiwi Bahri ◽  
Jennifer Miskimins

Summary In this paper, we discuss proppant transport behavior in a complex slot system. Specifically for this study, focus is placed on two different fluid systems, a water/glycerin solution and a water/sodium chloride solution, which represent varying fluid densities and viscosities. The effects of changing fluid viscosities, fluid densities, proppant densities, proppant sizes, proppant concentrations, and slurry injection rates on proppant transport were then experimentally investigated. The slot system consists of a 4-ft long, 0.2-in. primary slot with three secondary slots and two tertiary slots, all at 90° angles to each other. The fluid systems represented brine fluids up to 9.24 ppg and viscous fluids up to 4.3 cp. Although glycerin was used for viscosification, the results can be compared to fluid systems with similar viscosities that are created using other additives such as friction reducers. The proppants used in the study consisted of two sands of 100 and 40/70 mesh (specific gravity of 2.65) and two 40/70 ceramic proppants with specific gravities of 2.08 and 2.71. The study results show that a water/glycerin solution, with a viscosity of 4.3 cp, has significant proppant-carrying capacity with proppants delivered uniformly to greater distances. In addition, sieve analysis conducted on each of the various slots indicated that for all tested proppants that the water/glycerin systems were more capable of carrying larger particles to farther distances. Conversely, the results show that a water/sodium chloride solution of 9.24 ppg density has less capability to carry the proppant farther into the slots. From a comparison standpoint, in all tested cases, viscosity increases had a greater impact on the overall proppant transport than fluid density. In addition, results of the study showed that both increasing proppant concentrations and injection rates have a positive impact on proppant transport, with more proppant being transported farther into the slot system in both cases. The higher the proppant concentration, the sooner the equilibrium dune height (EDH; height when transport starts to occur after dune building) was achieved, the more efficient transport became. Increasing the injection rate led to improving proppant transport by increasing the drag and lift forces on the proppant, which lead to decreased proppant settling velocities and transport farther into the slots.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Thomas Hu ◽  
David Fisher ◽  
Pious Kurian ◽  
Ron Calaway

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document