Proppant Transport by a High Viscosity Friction Reducer

Author(s):  
Y. Thomas Hu ◽  
David Fisher ◽  
Pious Kurian ◽  
Ron Calaway
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Xu ◽  
James Ogle ◽  
Todd Collier ◽  
Ian Straffin ◽  
Teddy Dubois ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Al-Hulail ◽  
Oscar Arauji ◽  
Ali AlZaki ◽  
Mohamed Zeghouani

Abstract Proppant placement in a tight formation is extremely challenging. Therefore, using a high viscous friction reducer (HVFR) as a fracturing fluid for stimulation treatment in tight gas reservoirs is increasing within the industry because it can transport proppant, help reduce pipe friction generated during hydraulic-fracturing treatments, and efficiently clean up similar to the lower viscosity friction reducers (FRs). In this paper the implementation of the robust HVFR that is building higher viscosity at low concentrations, which minimizes energy loss and promotes turbulent flow within the pipe during the pumping of low viscosity, is discussed in detail. Performance evaluation of the new HVFR was conducted in the laboratory and compared to the lower viscosity FR. The study consisted of viscosity measurements at 70 and 180°F, compatibility with other additives, and proppant transport capabilities. Additionally, the viscosity generated from both FRs was compared using two water sources: water well A and treated sewage water. Viscosity measurements were performed across a wide range of FR and HVFR concentrations and under varying shear rates using a digital viscometer. To validate drag reduction capabilities for this HVFR in the field, the same groundwater with low salinity and low total dissolved solids (TDS) content were used for comparison purposes. The test plan for this new HVFR was for a well to be drilled to a total depth of 17,801 ft MD (10,693 ft TVD) with a 6,016-ft lateral section. Another part of the plan was to complete 41 stages—the first stage with the toe initiator, and subsequent stages using ball drops until Stage 8, were completed using the current FR. For Stage 8, the drag reduction from the new HVFR was evaluated against the current FR only during the pad stage. Then, FR or HVFR concentrations were used, with a gradual reduction from 2 to 1 gpt without compromising proppant placement from stages 9 to 37, alternating current FR and the new HVFR every four stages. From Stage 38 to 41, the same approach was used but with treated sewage water and alternating every other stage using current FR or HVFR at 1gpt. The implementation of the new HVFR showed better friction reduction when using the same concentration of the current FR. Also, achieving better average treating pressures with lower concentration. Based on that it is a cost-effective solution and the performance is better, this lead to reduce the HVFR volume to be pumped per stage compared to the current FR. Applications/Significance/Novelty For this study, drag reduction capabilities for this new HVFR were validated in the field at higher pumping rate conditions, potentially optimizing (reducing) the polymer concentration during a freshwater application. It was shown that lower concentrations of this HVFR provided higher viscosity, which helps improve proppant transport and operation placement.


SPE Journal ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (05) ◽  
pp. 974-985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahil Malhotra ◽  
Eric R. Lehman ◽  
Mukul M. Sharma

Summary New fracturing techniques, such as hybrid fracturing (Sharma et al. 2004), reverse-hybrid fracturing (Liu et al. 2007), and channel (HiWAY) fracturing (Gillard et al. 2010), have been deployed over the past few years to effectively place proppant in fractures. The goal of these methods is to increase the conductivity in the proppant pack, providing highly conductive paths for hydrocarbons to flow from the reservoir to the wellbore. This paper presents an experimental study on proppant placement by use of a new method of fracturing, referred to as alternate-slug fracturing. The method involves an alternate injection of low-viscosity and high-viscosity fluids, with proppant carried by the low-viscosity fluid. Alternate-slug fracturing ensures a deeper placement of proppant through two primary mechanisms: (i) proppant transport in viscous fingers, formed by the low-viscosity fluid, and (ii) an increase in drag force in the polymer slug, leading to better entrainment and displacement of any proppant banks that may have formed. Both these effects lead to longer propped-fracture length and better vertical placement of proppant in the fracture. In addition, the method offers lower polymer costs, lower pumping horsepower, smaller fracture widths, better control of fluid leakoff, less risk of tip screenouts, and less gel damage compared with conventional gel fracture treatments. Experiments are conducted in simulated fractures (slot cells) with fluids of different viscosity, with proppant being carried by the low-viscosity fluid. It is shown that viscous fingers of low-viscosity fluid and viscous sweeps by the high-viscosity fluid lead to a deeper placement of proppant. Experiments are also conducted to demonstrate slickwater fracturing, hybrid fracturing, and reverse-hybrid fracturing. Comparison shows that alternate-slug fracturing leads to the deepest and most-uniform placement of proppant inside the fracture. Experiments are also conducted to study the mixing of fluids over a wide range of viscosity ratios. Data are presented to show that the finger velocities and mixing-zone velocities increase with viscosity ratio up to viscosity ratios of approximately 350. However, at higher viscosity ratios, the velocities plateau, signifying no further effect of viscosity contrast on the growth of fingers and mixing zone. The data are an integral part of design calculations for alternate-slug-fracturing treatments.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 2462
Author(s):  
Ghith Biheri ◽  
Abdulmohsin Imqam

Investigating the key factors that impact fluid rheology and proppant static settling velocity in high viscosity friction reducers (HVFRs) is a critical aspect for successful proppant transport in hydraulic fracture treatment. In this study, the rheological properties of HVFRs were tested at various temperature ranges (i.e., 25, 50, 75, and 100 °C) and different HVFR concentrations (i.e., 1, 2, 4, and 8 gpt). Three sizes of spherical particle diameters (i.e., 2, 4, and 6 mm) were selected to measure the static settling velocity. The fracture fluid was tested in two fracture models: an unconfined glass model and a confined rectangular model with two fracture widths (7 and 10 mm). The settling velocity in the confined and unconfined models was measured using an advanced video camera. HVFR results exhibited acceptable thermal stability even at higher temperatures, also the viscosity and elasticity increased considerably with increasing concentration. Increasing the temperature cut the friction reducer efficiency to suspend the spherical particles for a significant time, and that was observed clearly at temperatures that reached 75 °C. Spherical particles freely settled in the unconfined model due to the absence of the wall effect, and the settling velocity decreased significantly as the HVFR concentration increased. Additionally, the fracture angularity substantially slowed the proppant settling velocity due to both the wall effect and several types of friction. This research provides insights into the rheological parameters of a high viscosity friction reducer as a fracturing fluid and its efficiency in transporting particles in bounded and unbounded fracture networks.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingshe Song ◽  
Reinaldo Navarrete ◽  
Mahmoud Asadi ◽  
Bryan Jin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document