Elastic Friction Reducer Facilitates Proppant Transport and FR Residual Analysis Provides Insight into Potential Formation Damage

Author(s):  
Liang Xu ◽  
James Ogle ◽  
Todd Collier ◽  
Jeremy French ◽  
Rome Nichols ◽  
...  
Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 2252
Author(s):  
Karl Ronny Klungtvedt ◽  
Arild Saasen ◽  
Jan Kristian Vasshus ◽  
Vegard Bror Trodal ◽  
Swapan Kumar Mandal ◽  
...  

Industry testing procedures such as ANSI/API 13B-1 [1] describe a method for measuring fluid loss and studying filter-cake formation against a medium of either a filter paper or a porous disc, without giving information about potential formation damage. Considering the thickness of the discs, it may also be possible to extend the method to gain an insight into aspects of formation damage. A new experimental set-up and methodology was created to evaluate changes to the porous discs after HTHP testing to generate insight into signs of formation damage, such as changes in disc mass and permeability. Such measurements were enabled by placing the disc in a cell, which allowed for reverse flow of fluid to lift off the filter-cake. Experiments were conducted with different drilling fluid compositions to evaluate the use of the new methodology. The first test series showed consistent changes in disc mass as a function of the additives applied into the fluid. The data yield insights into how the discs are sealed and to which degree solids, fibers or polymers are entering the discs. A second series of tests were set up to extend the procedure to also measure changes in the disc’s permeability to air and water. The results showed that there was a positive correlation between changes in disc mass and changes in permeability. The conclusions are that the methodology may enable identifying signs of formation damage and that further studies should be conducted to optimize the method.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tariq A. AlMubarak ◽  
Mohammed H. AlKhaldi ◽  
Saroj K. Panda ◽  
Majed A. AlMubarak

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaber B. Al Jaberi ◽  
Badr S. Bageri ◽  
Assad Barri ◽  
Abdulrauf Adebayo ◽  
Shirish Patil ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
A. Vujasinovic ◽  
W. Moore

The use of snubbing techniques for through-tubing and complete workover operations offers several advantages over conventional methods. First, the work can be done under pressure, which means that the use of heavy kill fluids and subsequent potential formation damage is eliminated. Second, the well can be placed on production quickly because no cleanup time is required.To further increase the speed of the snubbing operation, a new technique has been successfully tested, which consists of using a special high pressure annular preventer in the snubbing package: with this arrangement, the tubing can be pulled almost continuously, avoiding the time consuming stripping through a ram preventer stack, where rams must be opened and closed in sequence every time a tubing joint is pulled.This paper describes and documents several factual high pressure (up to 10,000 psi) snubbing operations performed through the annular preventer, including stripping and rotating when drilling through bridge plugs, and compares the time and cost savings with equivalent snubbing operations performed in the conventional manner.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Xu ◽  
James Ogle ◽  
Todd Collier ◽  
Ian Straffin ◽  
Teddy Dubois ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Al-Hulail ◽  
Oscar Arauji ◽  
Ali AlZaki ◽  
Mohamed Zeghouani

Abstract Proppant placement in a tight formation is extremely challenging. Therefore, using a high viscous friction reducer (HVFR) as a fracturing fluid for stimulation treatment in tight gas reservoirs is increasing within the industry because it can transport proppant, help reduce pipe friction generated during hydraulic-fracturing treatments, and efficiently clean up similar to the lower viscosity friction reducers (FRs). In this paper the implementation of the robust HVFR that is building higher viscosity at low concentrations, which minimizes energy loss and promotes turbulent flow within the pipe during the pumping of low viscosity, is discussed in detail. Performance evaluation of the new HVFR was conducted in the laboratory and compared to the lower viscosity FR. The study consisted of viscosity measurements at 70 and 180°F, compatibility with other additives, and proppant transport capabilities. Additionally, the viscosity generated from both FRs was compared using two water sources: water well A and treated sewage water. Viscosity measurements were performed across a wide range of FR and HVFR concentrations and under varying shear rates using a digital viscometer. To validate drag reduction capabilities for this HVFR in the field, the same groundwater with low salinity and low total dissolved solids (TDS) content were used for comparison purposes. The test plan for this new HVFR was for a well to be drilled to a total depth of 17,801 ft MD (10,693 ft TVD) with a 6,016-ft lateral section. Another part of the plan was to complete 41 stages—the first stage with the toe initiator, and subsequent stages using ball drops until Stage 8, were completed using the current FR. For Stage 8, the drag reduction from the new HVFR was evaluated against the current FR only during the pad stage. Then, FR or HVFR concentrations were used, with a gradual reduction from 2 to 1 gpt without compromising proppant placement from stages 9 to 37, alternating current FR and the new HVFR every four stages. From Stage 38 to 41, the same approach was used but with treated sewage water and alternating every other stage using current FR or HVFR at 1gpt. The implementation of the new HVFR showed better friction reduction when using the same concentration of the current FR. Also, achieving better average treating pressures with lower concentration. Based on that it is a cost-effective solution and the performance is better, this lead to reduce the HVFR volume to be pumped per stage compared to the current FR. Applications/Significance/Novelty For this study, drag reduction capabilities for this new HVFR were validated in the field at higher pumping rate conditions, potentially optimizing (reducing) the polymer concentration during a freshwater application. It was shown that lower concentrations of this HVFR provided higher viscosity, which helps improve proppant transport and operation placement.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasad Karadkar ◽  
Mohammed Alabdrabalnabi ◽  
Mohammed Bataweel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document