Optimization of Deep-Drilling Performance--Benchmark Testing Drives ROP Improvements for Bits and Drilling Fluids

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. 25-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnis Judzis ◽  
Alan D. Black ◽  
David A. Curry ◽  
Matthew J. Meiners ◽  
Tim Grant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Deep Drilling ◽  
Benchmark Testing ◽  
Drilling Performance ◽  
Performance Benchmark

Optimization of Deep Drilling Performance; Benchmark Testing Drives ROP Improvements for Bits and Drilling Fluids

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnis Judzis ◽  
Alan Duane Black ◽  
David A. Curry ◽  
Matthew John Meiners ◽  
Tim Grant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Deep Drilling ◽  
Benchmark Testing ◽  
Drilling Performance ◽  
Performance Benchmark

Conical Diamond Element on PDC Bits Sets New Drilling Performance Benchmark in Northern Kuwait Field

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhakil Al-Enezi ◽  
Bijan Goswami ◽  
Yogesh Takate ◽  
Talal Al-Wehaidah ◽  
Ayomarz Jokhi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drilling Performance ◽  
Performance Benchmark

scholarly journals Experimental Investigation of Inhibitive Drilling Fluids Performance: Case Studies from United States Shale Basins

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 5142
Author(s):  
Nabe Konate ◽  
Saeed Salehi
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Eagle Ford Shale ◽  
Oil And Gas Production ◽  
Shale Formations ◽  
Drilling Performance ◽  
Marine Shale ◽  
Fluid Systems

Shale formations are attractive prospects due to their potential in oil and gas production. Some of the largest shale formations in the mainland US, such as the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale (TMS), have reserves estimated to be around 7 billion barrels. Despite their huge potential, shale formations present major concerns for drilling operators. These prospects have unique challenges because of all their alteration and incompatibility issues with drilling and completion fluids. Most shale formations undergo numerous chemical and physical alterations, making their interaction with the drilling and completion fluid systems very complex to understand. In this study, a high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) drilling simulator was used to mimic real time drilling operations to investigate the performance of inhibitive drilling fluid systems in two major shale formations (Eagle Ford Shale and Tuscaloosa Marine Shale). A series of drilling experiments using the drilling simulator and clay swelling tests were conducted to evaluate the drilling performance of the KCl drilling fluid and cesium formate brine systems and their effectiveness in minimizing drilling concerns. Cylindrical cores were used to mimic vertical wellbores. It was found that the inhibitive muds systems (KCl and cesium formate) provided improved drilling performance compared to conventional fluid systems. Among the inhibitive systems, the cesium formate brine showed the best drilling performances due to its low swelling rate and improved drilling performance.

Wellbore Shielding Technique Increases Operative Window, Avoiding Formation Instability and Losses, Minimizing NPT, and Optimizing Drilling Operations in the Unconventional Plays

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaston Lopez ◽  
Gonzalo Vidal ◽  
Claus Hedegaard ◽  
Reinaldo Maldonado
Keyword(s):  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Wellbore Instability ◽  
Lost Circulation ◽  
Drilling Performance ◽  
Drilling Parameters ◽  
Vaca Muerta ◽  
Drilling Operations ◽  
Fracture Gradient ◽  
Vaca Muerta Formation

Abstract Losses, wellbore instability, and influxes during drillings operations in unconventional fields result from continuous reactivity to the drilling fluid causing instability in the microfractured limestone of the Quintuco Formation in Argentina. This volatile situation becomes more critical when drilling operations are navigating horizontally through the Vaca Muerta Formation, a bituminous marlstone with a higher density than the Quintuco Formation. Controlling drilling fluids invasion between the communicating microfractures and connecting pores helps to minimize seepage losses, total losses, wellbore fluid influxes, and instabilities, reducing the non-productive time (NPT) caused by these problems during drilling operations. The use of conventional sealants – like calcium carbonate, graphite, asphalt, and other bridging materials – does not guarantee problem-free drilling operations. Also, lost circulation material (LCM) is restricted because the MWD-LWD tools clearances are very narrow in these slim holes. The challenge is to generate a strong and resistant seal separating the drilling fluid and the formation. Using an ultra-low-invasion technology will increase the operative fracture gradient window, avoid fluid invasion to the formation, minimize losses, and stop the cycle of fluid invasion and instability, allowing operations to maintain the designed drilling parameters and objectives safely. The ultra-low-invasion wellbore shielding technology has been applied in various fields, resulting in significantly improved drilling efficiencies compared to offset wells. The operator has benefited from the minimization of drilling fluids costs and optimization in drilling operations, including reducing the volume of oil-based drilling fluids used per well, fewer casing sections, and fewer requirements for cementing intervals to solve lost circulation problems. This paper will discuss the design of the ultra-low-invasion technology in an oil-based drilling fluid, the strategy for determining the technical limits for application, the evaluation of the operative window with an increase in the fracture gradient, the optimized drilling performance, and reduction in costs, including the elimination of NPT caused by wellbore instability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document