scholarly journals Serpukhovian coral assemblages from Idmarrach and Tirhela Formations (Adarouch, Morocco)

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 29-42
Author(s):  
Sergio RODRÍGUEZ ◽  
Ismail SAID ◽  
Ian D. SOMERVILLE ◽  
Pedro CÓZAR ◽  
Ismael CORONADO

The Serpukhovian coral assemblages from Idmarrach and Tirhela formations (Adarouch, Morocco) have been studied. They yielded quite diverse assemblages with a total of 32 rugose and 1 tabulate species. The distribution of corals in the sections Idmarrach 1, 2, 3, and 4 and Tirhela 1 and 2 has been established, which include Serpukhovian and Bashkirian rocks. The Serpukhovian assemblages are composed mostly of species that have their higher abundance in the upper Viséan. However, most of the recorded taxa in Adarouch have been already mentioned in Serpukhovian rocks from Britain, Moscow Basin, Urals, Donets Basin and other North African regions such as Tindouf and Béchar. Thus, their stratigraphic range is not expanded. The coral diversity is mainly concentrated in biostromes from the Idmarrach 1 section. However, the high total diversity is due to the combination of favourable depositional settings and a mixture in different beds of several ecological environments, such as coral shoals, protected lagoons and microbial mounds. Most Serpukhovian species have been recorded in areas from the western Palaeotethys previously mentioned. The total assemblage can be considered as typical for the late Mississippian in the western Palaeotethys. However, a small degree of isolation is registered by the absence in the Serpukhovian from Adarouch of the genera Lonsdaleia, Actinocyathus, Tizraia and Kizilia that have been recorded in other North African basins. That fact may be explained by the incipient rising of some areas as ‘highs’ due to the start of the collision between Gondwana and Laurasia.

Author(s):  
Tamara I. Nemyrovska

Detailed new data on paleontology and stratigraphy were obtained in the process of fulfilling the tasks of the International Carboniferous Subcommission on definition of the scopes of the Moscovian and Kasimovian global stages and the precise position of the boundary between them. The analysis of these data has shown that the position of this boundary in the type  area and in the other regions needs the revision. Recently the investigation of the conodonts from the Moscovian–Kasimovian boundary deposits in the Donets Basin revealed that the boundary between the Moscovian and Kasimovian stages in the official Ukrainian Carboniferous Stratigraphic Scheme does not correspond to this boundary in the type area of these stages in the  Moscow Basin. To correct this situation the lower boundary of the Kasimovian in the Ukrainian Scheme must be downgraded by two conodont zones — Swadelina subexcelsa and Sw. makhlinae. To update this boundary in the type area to fulfill the task of the Carboniferous Subcommission four conodont species were proposed as potential index-species for the definition of the boundary between the Moscovian and Kasimovian global stages. These conodont species are as follows Sw. subexcelsa,  Idiognathodus sagittalis, I. turbatus and I. heckeli. One of these species, which is selected, will be used as a marker of the  studied boundary. None of these species is officially selected as a marker. If Sw. subexcelsa will be selected, the position of  the Moscovian–Kasimovian boundary will remain at the present position. In this case this boundary in the Donets Basin has to be downgraded by two conodont zones. If one of three Idiognathodus will be selected, this boundary in the type area will be   upgraded by one and a half regional substage. In the Donets Basin it will be upgraded by less than a cycle. Keywords: Carboniferous, stratigraphy, conodonts, extinction event, index-­species. 


2021 ◽  
pp. SP512-2021-134
Author(s):  
Alexander S. Alekseev ◽  
Svetlana V. Nikolaeva ◽  
Nataliya V. Goreva ◽  
Nina B. Donova ◽  
Olga L. Kossovaya ◽  
...  

AbstractSeveral existing schemes for Carboniferous stratigraphy officially adopted in regions of the Russian Federation are summarized and discussed. These regions with different geological histories and distinct depositional settings include the Moscow Basin, the Urals, North Timan, Siberia, the Kuznetsk Basin, the Mongol-Okhotsk Region, and the Verkhoyansk-Okhotsk Region, and Kolyma-Omolon Region. Region. Broad correlations based on macro- and microfossils are possible between the regions, while all regional schemes are correlated to the official Russian General Stratigraphic Scheme for the Carboniferous, using zonations based on orthostratigraphic fossils. The Russian General Stratigraphic Scheme is correlated to the International Stratigraphic Scale using ammonoids, conodonts, foraminifers and palynomorphs.


2007 ◽  
Vol 81 (S69) ◽  
pp. 1-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beate Fohrer ◽  
Tamara I. Nemyrovska ◽  
Elias Samankassou ◽  
Katsumi Ueno

The mid-Moscovian Izvarino section, Donets Basin, eastern Ukraine, exhibits a complete sedimentological record of siliciclastics (sandstones, siltstones, and calcareous shales) with limestone intercalations and, rarely, coal seams. A multidisciplinary study including microfacies analysis, systematic paleontology (conodonts, fusulinoideans, and ostracodes), biostratigraphy, and paleoecology was focused on the limestones, from limestone L4 through limestone M1, and the adjacent marine shales. Based on sedimentology and fossil associations, the cyclic sediments of the Izvarino section were interpreted as entirely marine deposits of open- and shallow-marine, nearshore and offshore environments with variable terrigenous input.The well-preserved ostracode faunas are dominated by representatives of the families Amphissitidae, Hollinellidae, Healdiidae, Cavellinidae, and Paraparchitidae. The total fauna is 18 species, of which four are new: Hollinella (Hollinella) granuloba Fohrer, n. sp., Hollinella (Praehollinella) kamenka Fohrer, n. sp., Jordanites krasnodonensis Fohrer, n. sp., and Asturiella donbassica Fohrer, n. sp. The conodont fauna includes 21 species belonging to nine genera and includes one new species: Idiognathodus izvaricus Nemyrovska, n. sp. The conodont faunas are dominated by idiognathodontids. Representatives of Diplognathodus and Neognathodus play a subordinate role. A total of 56 fusulinoidean species referable to 20 genera has been identified; one is new: Eostaffella brazhnikovae Ueno, n. sp.Conodont and fusulinoidean biostratigraphy led to surprising differences in the age assignment of the Izvarino section and its correlation with the nearby Moscow Basin, Russia. The interval studied is lower Kashirian (Tsninskaya) to middle Kashirian (Narskaya), according to conodonts. It extends to the base of the Podolskian, however, according to fusulinoideans. This discrepancy is possibly related to problems in correlation of the type sections in the Moscow Basin. It calls for reexamination of the mid-Moscovian boundary interval and shows the limits of interbasinal correlations based on a single fossil group.


2013 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rimma R. Khodjanyazova ◽  
Vladimir I. Davydov

A fusulinoidean taxonomic study of the Gurkovo and Kalinovo sections allows us to refine the biostratigraphy of the poorly studied Myachkovian (upper Moscovian) strata of the “N” Formation in the Donets Basin. Three fusulinid biozones,Hemifusulina graciosa–Fusiella spatiosa,Fusulina cylindrica–Fusulinella pseudobocki, andFusulinella?kumpani, are proposed in the interval from the top of Limestone M10to the base of N3, and they are correlated with coeval strata in the historical type area of the Moscow Basin. A total of 33 fusulinid species and subspecies belonging to eight genera are described, including three new species:Hemifusulina gurkovensisn. sp.,Beedeina innaeformisn. sp., andFusulina sosninaen. sp. The main evolutionary trend in fusulinoidean morphology in the late Moscovian is the appearance of massive secondary deposits in the limestone of the “N” Formation.Specific temporal and distributional patterns of the Middle Pennsylvanian fusulinoidean assemblages indicate variations in sea level stand. Variations are cyclic, with periods ∼600,000–1,000,000 years. AHemifusulina-association indicates the beginning of transgression; the late transgression–high sea level stand is designated by theBeedeina–Neostaffella–Ozawainella–Taitzehoellaassemblage which is successively replaced by the most diverseFusulinella-dominant association, which occupied a progressively shallowing sea.The similarity of fusulinoidean assemblages in the Moscow and Donets Basins and their cognate evolution trends reveal a connection between both regions at least during Podolskian–Myachkovian time.


2003 ◽  
Vol 174 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Izart ◽  
Yves Le Nindre ◽  
Randell Stephenson ◽  
Denis Vaslet ◽  
Sergei Stovba

Abstract A comparative quantitative analysis of late Paleozoic subsidence in the Moscow and Dniepr-Donets basins provides additional insight into the relative importance of tectonics and eustacy as sedimentation driving forces. Late Devonian rifting clearly displayed in the Dniepr-Donets Basin and underlying Precambrian East European Craton probably also affected the Moscow Basin. After this episode, however, the history of both basins diverged ; rifting processes ceased in the Moscow Basin but continued in the Dniepr-Donets Basin. The Moscow Basin is an intracratonic basin that can be modelled with a lithospheric heating phase from Devonian to Bashkirian times and a subsequent cooling phase generating thermal subsidence from Moscovian to Asselian times. The Dniepr-Donets Basin is a rift basin displaying an initial rifting phase during the late Devonian, an initial phase of post-rift evolution from the Tournaisian to the base of late Viséan, and a second rifting phase, seen mainly in the Donets and Donbas segments only, from late Viséan to Asselian times. Subsequent subsidences ended with uplift during the Sakmarian and were overprinted by compressional tectonics during Mesozoic and Cenozoic times. A comparison of local and global second-order stratigraphic sequences, allowing an estimation of the ratio of the importance of eustatic to tectonic processes controlling subsidence in each basin, demonstrates that eustacy controlled sedimentation in the Moscow Basin and tectonics prevailed in the Dniepr-Donets Basin.


1999 ◽  
Vol 249 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-461
Author(s):  
El Hassan El Mouden ◽  
Mohammed Znari ◽  
Richard P. Brown

Geo&Bio ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (16) ◽  
pp. 99-109
Author(s):  
E. Ulyura ◽  
◽  
V. Tytar ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document