scholarly journals Orden público internacional y prohibición de control de competencia judicial internacional: Asunto c-455/15 PPU, P y Q = Public policy rule and prohibition of review of jurisdiction of the court of origin: Case c 455/15 PPU, P v Q

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 635
Author(s):  
Celia M. Caamiña Domínguez
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Parental Responsibility ◽  
Policy Rule ◽  
The Public ◽  
Child Abduction ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
International Child ◽  
Forum Non Conveniens ◽  
Council Regulation

Resumen: Este artículo trata sobre la Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea de 19 de noviembre de 2015, relativa al orden público internacional como motivo de denegación del reconocimiento de una resolución en materia de responsabilidad parental y a la prohibición de control de la competencia judicial internacional del tribunal del Estado miembro de origen, en el ámbito del Reglamento 2201/2003.Palabras clave: derecho de custodia, orden público internacional, forum non conveniens, sustracción internacional de menores.Abstract: This article deals with the Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2015, related to the public policy rule as a ground of non-recognition of judgments in matters of parental responsibility and to the prohibition of review of jurisdiction of the court of origin in the field of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003.Keywords: rights of custody, public policy rule, forum non conveniens, international child abduction.

scholarly journals Unification of Judicial Practice Concerning Parental Responsibility in the European Union – Challenges Applying Regulation Brussels II Bis

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-127
Author(s):  
Kristina Pranevičienė
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Hague Convention ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Parental Responsibility ◽  
Child Abduction ◽  
National Courts ◽  
International Child ◽  
Special Cases ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Council Regulation

Abstract The article briefly describes international legislation in parental responsibility matters and focuses on the Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (in practice called Brussels II a or Brussels II bis). The essay reveals and analyses the difficulties which occur while hearing parental responsibility cases within the European Union. Particular attention is given to special cases which were difficult to resolve for the national courts of the Republic of Lithuania. Also, the practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union is examined. The guidelines on how to avoid the problems of establishing jurisdiction are given. The relations of 1980 Hague Convention on international child abduction and Regulations Brussels II bis are revealed and the reasons for adoption of the Regulation are highlighted. The article also proposes improvements for Article 15 of the Regulation and the effective application of a modified forum non conveniens doctrine in parental responsibility cases.

scholarly journals Występek uprowadzenia osoby małoletniej lub nieporadnej na tle regulacji międzynarodowych

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-52
Author(s):  
Michalina Miązek
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
International Agreement ◽  
Parental Responsibility ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Child Abduction ◽  
International Child ◽  
International Regulations ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
The Hague ◽  
Council Regulation

International regulations provide comprehensive and sufficient protection against cross-border abductions and detentions. Among the most important international law instruments is the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. (The Hague, 25th October 1980) This international agreement allows protection for victims of the crime in question against its negative effects. In addition, the Convention guarantees the immediate return of the unlawfully abducted or detained to the country of permanent residence. Among the discussed international law documents, the Council Regulation No. 2201/2003 (the so-called Brussels II bis 27th November 2003) deserves special attention. It regulates jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments and parental responsibility.

scholarly journals Sustracción internacional de menores. Asunto vinculado con Suiza y España. Comentario de la sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Pontevedra (Sección 1ª) núm. 52/2018, de 17 de abril = International child abduction. Case related with Switzerland and Spain. Comment on the judgment of the Spanish Court of Appeal of Pontevedra (Section 1) number 52/2018 of 17th April

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 671
Author(s):  
Carmen Azcárraga Monzonís
Keyword(s):  
Hague Convention ◽  
Parental Responsibility ◽  
Habitual Residence ◽  
Child Abduction ◽  
International Child ◽  
The Hague ◽  
A Minor ◽  
The Hague Convention ◽  
Court Of Appeal

Resumen: Sustracción internacional a España de menor residente en Suiza en aplicación del Con­venio de La Haya de 1980 sobre los aspectos civiles de la sustracción internacional de menores. Discre­pancia sobre la residencia habitual del menor. No se aprecian motivos de no retorno.Palabras clave: sustracción internacional de menores, Convenio de La Haya sobre sustracción, Convenio de La Haya sobre responsabilidad parental y protección de menores, residencia habitualAbstract: International abduction to Spain of a minor residing in Switzerland under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction of 1980. Discrepancy about the habi­tual residence of the minor. No grounds for return denial are appreciated.Keywords: international child abduction, Hague Convention on Child Abduction, Hague Conven­tion on Parental Responsibility and Measures of the Protection of Children, habitual residence

scholarly journals La construcción del concepto autónomo de residencia habitual del menor en los supuestos de sustracción internacional de menores = The construction of the autonomous concept of habitual residence of the child in the cases of international abduction of children

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 877
Author(s):  
Isabel Reig Fabado
Keyword(s):  
Best Interests ◽  
Legal Systems ◽  
Parental Responsibility ◽  
Habitual Residence ◽  
Child Abduction ◽  
International Child

Resumen: La concreción de la residencia habitual del menor en los supuestos de sustracción internacional de menores ha resultado especialmente problemática por varias razones. En primer lugar por las interpretaciones divergentes que se han dado en los diferentes ordenamientos jurídicos y, en segundo término, por plantearse de manera especialmente delicada en estos supuestos en los que concurre la sustracción internacional de menores. Y, finalmente y a mayor abundamiento, por la ausencia de un concepto de residencia habitual del menor en la normativa reguladora. Probablemente, la necesidad de concretarlo, en aras al principio del interés superior del menor, en atención a criterios fácticos que, bajo el método casuístico, requiere un análisis de una serie de circunstancias ex casu. Piénsese que, en definitiva, la residencia habitual del menor se configura como criterio clave para la determinación de aspectos tan relevantes como la competencia judicial internacional, no solo en los casos de responsabilidad parental, sino y asimismo, en los supuestos de traslado o retención ilícitos de menores.Palabras clave: sustracción internacional de menores, retención ilícita, competencia judicial internacional, residencia habitual del menor, concepto autónomo, integración y adaptación, retorno inmediato, restitución.Abstract: The realization of the habitual residence of the minor in cases of international child abduction has been especially problematic for several reasons. In the first place because of the divergent interpretations that have been given in the different legal systems and, secondly, because they are considered to be particularly sensitive in these cases in which international child abduction occurs. And, finally and to a greater extent, by the absence of a concept of habitual residence of the minor in the regulatory regulations. Probably, the need to make it concrete, based on the principle of the best interests of the child, in response to factual criteria that, under the casuistic method, requires an analysis of a series of ex-casu circumstances. Think that, definitively, the habitual residence of the minor is configured as a key criterion for the determination of aspects as important as international judicial competence, not only in cases of parental responsibility, but also, in the event of illicit transfer or retention of children.Keywords: international child abduction, illegal retention, international judicial competence, habitual residence of the minor, autonomous concept, integration and adaptation, immediate return, restitution.

scholarly journals International Child Abduction in the European Union: the Solutions Incorporated by the Council Regulation

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-364
Author(s):  
Mónica Herranz Ballesteros
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Hague Convention ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Community Law ◽  
Child Abduction ◽  
International Child ◽  
Council Regulation ◽  
New Community

This paper analyzes the new regulation developed in the European Union aimed at international child abductions. The Hague Convention of 25 October, 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is the instrument that authorities of the contracting States were using to decide about the restitution of the child. The main focus of this article will firstly, study how the Hague Convention of 25 October, 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is going to be put into practice with the Council Regulation (EC) N° 2201/2003; subsequently try to see which are the modifications in the new Community law in relation to the Council Regulation (EC) N° 1347/2000; and finally, we will examine the innovations included in the new Council Regulation.

CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS: I. Brussels II bis: Matrimonial Matters, Parental Responsibility, Child Abduction and Mutual Recognition

2004 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 503-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter McEleavy
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
Free Movement ◽  
Council Meeting ◽  
Parental Responsibility ◽  
Member States ◽  
Child Abduction ◽  
Formal Classification ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
Council Regulation

At the Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) Council meeting in Brussels on 2 and 3 October 2003 final political agreement was reached on a new and expanded version of the Brussels II Regulation, a text which has commonly become known as Brussels II bis. The instrument, which was adopted by the JHA ministers on 27 November, has now received formal classification as Council Regulation No 2201/2003 Concerning Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Matrimonial Matters and Matters Relating to Parental Responsibility Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000.1 The net result of this precipitous reform is that Brussels JJ shall cease to have effect from 1 May 2005,2 a mere 4 years and 2 months after it entered into force. Henceforth there will be a single, integrated instrument which will cover, inter alia, the free movement of judgments in matters of parental responsibility as well as of matrimonial judgments and introduce provisions on cooperation between Member States.

scholarly journals Ética, terrorismo de estado y masculinidad: la vía del terror vista desde la óptica de género

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Gabriela Castellanos Llanos
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
The Public ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
Politica Publica ◽  
And Gender ◽  
The Way ◽  
Lesser Evil

Resumen: Este ensayo es una reflexión sobre el terrorismo, mostrando su evolución a través de la historia y su exacerbación actual, señalando además que el terrorismo de Estado, a pesar de ser la forma más mortífera, tiende a ser públicamente aceptada. De igual forma, enfatiza que el ataque a las Torres Gemelas se ha utilizado para justificar ataques preventivos, torturas y hasta la suspensión de la protección legal a prisioneros, y se pregunta cuál debe ser la política pública para combatir el terrorismo de una manera ética, mostrando por qué la solución del mal menor propuesta por Michael Ignatieff es sólo un viejo truco argumentativo y no conduce a cambios reales. Por ello, se insiste en el diálogo como forma de garantizar el reconocimiento de la diversidad, la defensa de los derechos civiles y el fortalecimiento de la democracia. Finalmente, se analizan diversos aspectos del militarismo, mostrando las relaciones de esta tendencia con el género y especí- ficamente con la masculinidad. Palabras clave: ética, terrorismo, militarismo, masculinidad, género Abstract: This essay reflects on terrorism, showing its evolution throughout history and its present-day exacerbation, also pointing out that terrorism on the part of the State, in spite of being the most deadly form, tends to be accepted by the public. Likewise, it stresses the way the 9/11 attack has been used to justify preemptive attacks, torture and even the suspension of political protection to prisoners, and asks what type of public policy must be used to fight terrorism in an ethical manner, showing why Michael Ignatieff’s proposal of the lesser evil is only an old argumentative trick and leads to no real changes. Therefore, there is an insistence on dialogue as the way to guarantee the recognition of diversity, the defense of civil rights and the strengthening of democracy. Finally, diverse aspects of militarism are analyzed, showing the relations between this tendency and gender, specifically with masculinity.Key words: ethics, terrorism, militarism, masculinity, gender

scholarly journals Responsabilidad parental y la aplicación del forum non conveniens de carácter reglado del artículo 15 del reglamento (CE) Nº 2201/2003 : la STJUE de 27 de octubre de = Parental responsibility and the application of regulated forum non conveniens of article 15 of Council Regulation (EC) Nº 2001/2003 : the ECJ judgement of 27th October 2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 639
Author(s):  
Bárbara Sánchez López
Keyword(s):  
Member State ◽  
Parental Responsibility ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
International Jurisdiction ◽  
Forum Non Conveniens ◽  
Scope Of Application ◽  
Council Regulation

Resumen: Esta sentencia del TJUE aborda el ámbito y las condiciones que impone el artículo 15 del Reglamento (CE) 2201/2003, del Consejo, de 27 de noviembre de 2003, relativo a la competencia, el reconocimiento y la ejecución de resoluciones judiciales en materia matrimonial y de responsabilidad parental, para que el tribunal competente se abstenga de conocer del asunto por apreciar que los tribunales de otro Estado miembro con el que el menor presenta una vinculación especial está mejor situado para resolverlo en atención a su superior interés. La sentencia examina las circunstancias de este peculiar forum non conveniens de carácter reglado que es característico de este reglamento comunitario.Palabras clave: competencia judicial internacional; responsabilidad parental; forum non conveniens; remisión del asunto al tribunal mejor situado; interés del menor. Abstract: This ECJ judgment addresses the scope of application and the conditions that art. 15 of Council Regulation (EC) nº 2201/2003 (…) impose in order to a court having jurisdiction may transfer the case to a court of another Member State which the child has a particular connection with and it would be a court better placed to hear the case taking into account the best interest of the child. The Judgment examines the circumstances of this particular and regulated forum non conveniens that is characteristic of this Council Regulation. Keywords: international jurisdiction; parental responsibility; forum non conveniens; transfer to a court better placed to hear the case; best interest of the child.

scholarly journals DA REVOLUÇÃO VERDE AO DISCURSO DO PRONAF: a representação do desenvolvimento nas políticas públicas de desenvolvimento rural no Brasil

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (02) ◽  
pp. 93-124
Author(s):  
Michell Leonard Duarte de Lima Tolentino
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Rural Development ◽  
Turning Point ◽  
Public Policies ◽  
Green Revolution ◽  
Development Model ◽  
Fundamental Importance ◽  
The Public ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
Main Development

Este trabalho procura refletir acerca das várias representações de desenvolvimento que embasam algumas das políticas públicas de desenvolvimento rural no Brasil, partindo das representações de desenvolvimento subjacentes à Revolução Verde e focando, posteriormente, no discurso do Programa Nacional de Fortalecimento da Agricultura Familiar (PRONAF). O trabalho se embasa em uma ampla pesquisa bibliográfica e documental. De início abordamos o discurso do desenvolvimento de forma crítica, para logo depois atentarmos para a maneira como este coloca o espaço rural. Para tanto utilizamos autores como Esteva (2000), Escobar (2000), Santos (1979) e Montenegro Gómez (2006). Posteriormente analisamos a Revolução Verde “brasileira” compreendendo o fordismo enquanto seu principal modelo de desenvolvimento. Em seguida, partimos para uma reflexão mais profunda sobre o PRONAF. O PRONAF assume fundamental importância nesse trabalho, pois o entendemos enquanto uma política de extrema relevância para se ler esse momento de inflexão das políticas públicas para o campo, de mudança nas representações sobre o espaço rural e o desenvolvimento rural brasileiro. Ao nos determos no PRONAF, discutimos a mudança de um modelo de desenvolvimento fordista para um modelo de desenvolvimento flexível. Palavras-Chave: Desenvolvimento; Políticas públicas; PRONAF; Revolução Verde.   FROM GREEN REVOLUTION TO THE SPEECH OF PRONAF: the representation of development in public policies for rural development in Brazil Abstract This article seeks to reflect on the various representations of development that underlie some of the public policies for rural development in Brazil, based on the development of representations underlying to  Green Revolution and focusing later in the speech of the Programa Nacional de Fortalecimento da Agricultura Familiar (PRONAF). The study was grounded in an extensive bibliographic and documentary research. At first we approached the discourse of development in a critical way, for after we pay attention to the countryside’s analysis. For this purpose we study authors as Esteva (2000), Escobar (2000), Santos (1979) and Montenegro Gómez (2006). Subsequently analyzed the Green Revolution "Brazilian" comprising Fordism as its main development model. Then, we set out to a deeper review on the PRONAF. The PRONAF is of fundamental importance in this article, as we understand it as an extremely important policy to read this turning point of public policy for the field of change in representations of the countryside and the Brazilian rural development. As we focused in PRONAF, we discussed the shift from a Fordist model of development for a flexible development model. Keywords: Development; Public policies; PRONAF; Green Revolution.   DE LA REVOLUCIÓN VERDE AL DISCURSO DEL PRONAF: la representación de desarollo en las políticas públicas de desarrollo rural en Brasil Resumen  Este trabajo busca reflexionar acerca de las varias representaciones de desarrollo que son la base de algunas de las políticas públicas de desarrollo rural en Brasil, desde las representaciones de desarrollo subyacentes a la Revolución Verde, focalizando posteriormente en el discurso del Programa Nacional de Fortalecimiento de la Agricultura Familiar (PRONAF). Los resultados aquí presentados son el resultado de un análisis profundo de bibliografía y de documentos. En la primera parte de esta investigación abordamos el discurso del desarrollo de forma crítica para luego analizar de qué manera en este es colocado el espacio rural, apoyándonos en autores como Esteva (2000), Escobar (2000), Santos (1979) y Montenegro Gómez (2006).  En una segunda parte, analizamos la Revolución Verde “brasileña” entendiendo el fordismo como su principal modelo de desarrollo, y una tercera parte, hacemos una reflexión más profunda sobre el PRONAF, siendo este un programa que toma fundamental importancia en nuestra investigación, ya que es una política de extrema relevancia para hacer una lectura del momento de inflexión entre las políticas públicas para el campo, de cambio en las representaciones sobre el espacio rural y el desarrollo rural brasilero. Al centrar nuestro interés en el PRONAF, estamos discutiendo el cambio de modelo de desarrollo fordista para un modelo de desarrollo flexible. Palabras Clave: Desarrollo; Políticas públicas; PRONAF; Revolución Verde.

scholarly journals Public policy rule as a ground for refusing in recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration awards in china mainland

2021 ◽  
pp. 251-257
Author(s):  
Qiu Xicheng
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Mainland China ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Policy Rule ◽  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
International Commercial Arbitration ◽  
The Public ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
China Mainland

In China, public policy is commonly defined as “social and public interest” or “public interest”, the understanding and boundaries of which are rather vague, which gives the court more a broad discretion in applying the public policy rule. The article examines the content and development of public order in the legislation of China. The author analyses the practice of application the public policy rule in China and provides statistical data about the ground for refusal of Chinese courts to enforce international commercial arbitration awards based on the information obtained from public databases containing Chinese court decisions. The author also provides examples of court decisions denying recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in mainland China and summarizes the rules for application by the Chinese people’s courts of the public policy rule, established in judicial decisions, and the tendencies in the development of China’s approach towards international commercial arbitration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document