scholarly journals Występek uprowadzenia osoby małoletniej lub nieporadnej na tle regulacji międzynarodowych

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-52
Author(s):  
Michalina Miązek

International regulations provide comprehensive and sufficient protection against cross-border abductions and detentions. Among the most important international law instruments is the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. (The Hague, 25th October 1980) This international agreement allows protection for victims of the crime in question against its negative effects. In addition, the Convention guarantees the immediate return of the unlawfully abducted or detained to the country of permanent residence. Among the discussed international law documents, the Council Regulation No. 2201/2003 (the so-called Brussels II bis 27th November 2003) deserves special attention. It regulates jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments and parental responsibility.

Teisė ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 162-180
Author(s):  
Kristina Pranevičienė

Straipsnyje analizuojamos vaikų grobimo Europos Sąjungos valstybėse narėse atvejais taikomos teis­mingumo nustatymo taisyklės, įtvirtintos 2003 m. lapkričio 27 d. Europos Tarybos reglamente (EB) Nr. 2201/2003 dėl jurisdikcijos ir teismo sprendimų, susijusių su santuoka ir tėvų pareigomis, pripažinimo bei vykdymo (sutrumpintai vadinamas Reglamentu Briuselis IIa arba Briuselis IIbis), taip pat Reglamento Briuselis IIa ir 1980 m. Hagos konvencijos „Dėl tarptautinio vaikų grobimo civilinių aspektų“ bei šiuos tarptautinės teisės aktus įgyvendinančio 2008 m. lapkričio 13 d. Lietuvos Respublikos civilinį procesą re­glamentuojančių Europos Sąjungos ir tarptautinės teisės aktų įgyvendinimo įstatymo nuostatos, regla­mentuojančios pagrobtų vaikų grąžinimą bei praktinės jų taikymo problemos. The article analyses the rules of jurisdiction in the cases of child abduction within the Member States of the European Union, which are established in Regulation of 27 November 2003 (EC) No 2201/2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgement in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility (abbreviated as Regulation Brussels IIa or Brussels IIbis), as well as the provisions of Regulation Brussels IIa, 1980 Hague Convention on International Child Abduction and 13 November 2008 Law of the Republic of Lithuania, implementing the acts of European Union and inter­national law, regulating civil process, implementing those instruments of international law, regulating the return of abducted children and practical problems of their application.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 671
Author(s):  
Carmen Azcárraga Monzonís

Resumen: Sustracción internacional a España de menor residente en Suiza en aplicación del Con­venio de La Haya de 1980 sobre los aspectos civiles de la sustracción internacional de menores. Discre­pancia sobre la residencia habitual del menor. No se aprecian motivos de no retorno.Palabras clave: sustracción internacional de menores, Convenio de La Haya sobre sustracción, Convenio de La Haya sobre responsabilidad parental y protección de menores, residencia habitualAbstract: International abduction to Spain of a minor residing in Switzerland under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction of 1980. Discrepancy about the habi­tual residence of the minor. No grounds for return denial are appreciated.Keywords: international child abduction, Hague Convention on Child Abduction, Hague Conven­tion on Parental Responsibility and Measures of the Protection of Children, habitual residence


2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 409-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asif Efrat ◽  
Abraham L. Newman

AbstractThe cross-border movement of people, goods, and information frequently results in legal disputes that come under the jurisdiction of multiple states. The principle of deference—acceptance of another state's exercise of legal authority—is one mechanism to manage such jurisdictional conflicts. Despite the importance of deference in international law and cooperation, little is known about the causes of variation in its use. In this article, we develop a theory of deference that focuses on the role that domestic institutions and norms play in ensuring procedural and substantive fairness. We test this theory in an original data set concerning accession practices in the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. Our findings offer considerable support for the idea that states evaluate partners on the likelihood that they can offer a fair legal process. Exploring empirically the efforts against parental child abduction, we offer a nuanced account of the link between domestic institutions and norms and international cooperation. This account suggests that greater attention should be paid to the use of deference as a mechanism to manage the conflicts posed by globalization.


BOOK REVIEWSBOOK REVIEWSvan der WeideJ. A.Lecturer in private international law, Faculty of Law, Free University, Amsterdam122001483367371RutgersJ.W., International Reservation of Title Clauses: A Study of Dutch, French and German Private International Law in the Light of European Law, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague 1999, XI + 233 pp., € 61.50/US$ 81/UK£ 47.25. ISBN 90-6704-116-5.Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 20012001T.M.C. Asser PresspdfS0165070X00001388a.pdfdispartBook Reviews1.See, e.g., VlietL.P.W. van, Transfer of Movables in German, French, English and Dutch Law (diss. Maastricht) (Nijmegen, Ars Aequi Libri 2000).2.1968 Brussels Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, most recently amended by the 1996 Accession Convention. The Brussels Convention will be converted into the Council Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Official Journal ECL 12, 16 01 2001), which will come into force on 1 March 2002. This Council Regulation shall apply to all EC Member States except Denmark.3.Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 (Official Journal EC L 200, 8 08 2000). Art. 4 states: ‘1) Member States shall provide in conformity with the applicable national provisions designated by private international law that the seller retains title to goods until they are fully paid for if a retention of title clause has been expressly agreed between the buyer and the seller before the delivery of the goods. 2) Member States may adopt or retain provisions dealing with down payments already made by the debtor.’4.See, e.g., MünchKomm-Kreuzer, Internatonales sachenrecht (München, C.H. Beck 1998), Nach Art. 38 Anh. I, nrs. 66–67; Staudinger/Stoll, Internationales Sachenrecht (Berlin, Sellier de Gruyter 1996) nrs. 282–285 and 292–294; WeberR.H., ‘Parteiautonomie im internationalen Sachenrecht?

2001 ◽  
Vol 48 (03) ◽  
pp. 367
Author(s):  
J. A. van der Weide

Author(s):  
Torremans Paul

This chapter examines private international law rules that govern orders concerning children, including orders determining with whom a child shall live or with whom he may have contact. It first considers the rules governing the jurisdiction of the English courts as regards parental responsibility matters, the choice of law rules applied, and the different provisions for the recognition and enforcement of parental responsibility and related orders made elsewhere. In particular, it discusses orders granted in another European Union Member State, except Denmark; orders granted in another Contracting State to the 1996 Hague Protection Convention; and orders granted in Scotland and Northern Ireland. It also analyses the relevant provisions of the Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985 and common law rules before concluding with an overview of other important developments including the 1996 Hague Convention and the Council of Europe Convention on Contact concerning Children.


2004 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 503-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter McEleavy

At the Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) Council meeting in Brussels on 2 and 3 October 2003 final political agreement was reached on a new and expanded version of the Brussels II Regulation, a text which has commonly become known as Brussels II bis. The instrument, which was adopted by the JHA ministers on 27 November, has now received formal classification as Council Regulation No 2201/2003 Concerning Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Matrimonial Matters and Matters Relating to Parental Responsibility Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000.1 The net result of this precipitous reform is that Brussels JJ shall cease to have effect from 1 May 2005,2 a mere 4 years and 2 months after it entered into force. Henceforth there will be a single, integrated instrument which will cover, inter alia, the free movement of judgments in matters of parental responsibility as well as of matrimonial judgments and introduce provisions on cooperation between Member States.


2018 ◽  
pp. 203-208
Author(s):  
Archana Shah

The world has become a global village and distance is no more the challenge. The direct impact of this positive change can be seen in interaction of various citizens of different countries belonging to diverse social, cultural and religious background. But cross border movements, inter-country migration and cross border marriages creates a new challenge like inter parental child abduction. In case of cross border broken marriages, there arise various issues like infringement of spouse’s parental rights, parallel conflicting legal disputes in different countries, non participation of various countries to Hague convention for welfare of children, isolation of child in foreign abodes due to connection with Indian soil, etc. Inter parental child abduction is neither considered as an offence, nor it is covered under any statutory laws of India. Like 94 nations, India is not a signatory to The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, 1980, a multi lateral treaty developed by Hague Conference on Private International Law. Due to its non signatory status the judges of foreign countries do not trust Indian courts and do not permit the parent to take child to India, fearing its non-return. In absence of any international legal instrument, the litigating parents will have to bear unnecessary expenses of visa, travel, litigation, etc and unfortunate child will become a trophy to be won in the clashes of egos of litigating parents.


Author(s):  
Daniela Correa Jacques Brauner

A CONTRIBUIÇÃO DOS PROCESSOS DE INTEGRAÇÃO – UNIÃO EUROPEIA E MERCOSUL – PARA A SUPERAÇÃO DAS DIFICULDADES DE APLICAÇÃO DA CONVENÇÃO DA HAIA SOBRE ASPECTOS CIVIS DO SEQUESTRO INTERNACIONAL DE CRIANÇAS THE CONTRIBUTION OF INTEGRATION PROCESSES - EUROPEAN UNION AND MERCOSUR - TO OVERCOME DIFFICULTIES OF APPLICATION OF THE HAGUE CONVENTION ON THE CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION Daniela Correa Jacques Brauner*RESUMO: O artigo inicia abordando a Convenção da Haia sobre Aspectos Civis da Subtração Internacional de Crianças de 1980 como forma de superação dos mecanismos tradicionais do direito internacional privado para resolver casos de litígio internacional em que um dos responsáveis parental se desloca para outro país com a criança, violando direito de guarda do outro responsável. Analisa-se o mecanismo de cooperação inserido na Convenção em que se determina o retorno imediato da criança para o local de sua residência habitual para que a autoridade judiciária dessa localidade resolva a questão da guarda e as exceções a esse retorno pela autoridade local. Sob essa perspectiva, analisa-se a efetividade da resolução de casos nessa temática e, em seguida, na segunda parte, propõe-se analisar se os processos de integração, com legislações próprias, contribuíram para a resolução dos casos de subtração internacional, conferindo maior confiabilidade nos mecanismos de circulação de decisões entre os tribunais. Examina-se o contexto da União Europeia com intensa normativa comum sobre casos de direito de família, inclusive com a participação da Corte Europeia de Direitos Humanos, para compará-lo ao Mercosul em que não se verifica mecanismos de integração aptos para aprimorar a solução de litígios. Em conclusão, salienta-se que a Convenção da Haia é mais bem cumprida em um ambiente de integração jurídica e econômica e com a possibilidade de instrumentos outros, como normativas comunitárias e acesso a Tribunais Internacionais. PALAVRAS-CHAVES: Convenção da Haia sobre Aspectos Civis do Sequestro Internacional de Crianças. Direito Internacional Privado. Cooperação. União Europeia. Mercosul. ABSTRACT: The article starts approaching the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction as a way of overcoming the traditional mechanisms of private international law to resolve international law disputes in which one parent (taking-parent) moves to another country violating custody rights of the other parent. It is analyzed the cooperation mechanism in the Convention that determines immediate return to the habitual place of residence so that the judicial authority of that location resolve the question of custody and the exceptions to this return by the local authority. From this perspective, it is analyzed the effectiveness of dispute resolution in this theme, and then, in the second part, it is proposed to examine whether the integration processes, with their own legislation, contributed to the resolution of cases of international abduction, providing greater reliability in circulation mechanisms of decisions between the courts. It is examined the context of the European Union with intense common rules on cases of family law, including the participation of the European Court of Human Rights, to compare it to Mercosur  in which are not found integration mechanisms able to improve the dispute resolution. In conclusion, it is noted that the Hague Convention is best accomplished in a legal and economic integration environment and with the possibility of other instruments such as Community regulations and access to international courts. KEYWORDS: Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction; Conflict of Law; Cooperation. European Union; Mercosur.  SUMÁRIO: Introdução. 1. A Convenção sobre Aspectos Civis do Sequestro Internacional de Crianças como superação dos mecanismos tradicionais do direito internacional privado. 1.1. A restituição imediata da criança ao país de residência habitual. 1.2. As exceções: permanência da criança no país de refúgio. 2. A influência dos processos de integração na aplicação da Convenção sobre Aspectos Civis do Sequestro Internacional de Crianças. 2.1. União Europeia: europeização do direito internacional privado. 2.2. Mercosul: a influência dos protocolos de cooperação jurídica. Considerações Finais. Referências.* Doutoranda em Direito pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Mestre em Direito pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Defensora Pública Federal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document