From duration analysis to GARCH models – An approach to systematization of quantitative methods in risk measurement

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (16) (3) ◽  
pp. 7-19
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Jajuga
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 240
Author(s):  
Salmah Said ◽  
A. Syathir Sofyan ◽  
Andi Muhammad Ali Amiruddin

<p><em>The crisis of confidence in the credit rating agency forced Islamic financing institutions to apply risk measurement methods independently and renewed the study of credit risk measurement. Moreover, this research also discusses mashlaha (public interest) in measuring financing risk. This research </em><em>use</em><em>s a mixed method</em><em> approach, </em><em>combining quantitative methods to measure risk by utilizing CreditRisk+</em><em>,</em><em> and qualitative </em><em>methods</em><em> in analyzing mashlaha </em><em>i</em><em>n these measurements. This study revealed that CreditRisk+</em> <em>is able to measure financing risk accurately.</em><em> This study also found that there is mashlaha as part of </em><em>maqashid al-sharia</em><em> in risk measur</em><em>e</em><em>ment</em><em>, namely 1) Tahdzib al-Fard, that mak</em><em>es</em><em> a financial institution capable of independently measuring the risk of its own financing; 2) Iqamah al-Adl, independent measurement will create information justice by comparing measurement results both internally and externally. 3) Mashlaha itself, with internal risk measurement</em><em>,</em><em> will reduce systemic risk. </em><em>The i</em><em>mplications of this study is </em><em>the use of mashlaha in analyzing financing risk provides more stringent prudential in the measurement of financing risk</em><em>.</em></p>


1985 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 796-797
Author(s):  
Barry S. Oken ◽  
Keith Chiappa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document