scholarly journals Impact Of New Facilities On Engineering Student Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Helbling ◽  
David Lanning ◽  
Ron Madler ◽  
Darin Marriott ◽  
Karl Siebold
Keyword(s):  
Student Outcomes ◽  
Engineering Student ◽  
New Facilities

Building the Entrepreneurial Mindset Through Cross-Functional Innovation Teams

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Schoonmaker ◽  
Robert Gettens ◽  
Glenn Vallee
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Outcomes ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Engineering Student ◽  
Course Assessment ◽  
Course Changes ◽  
Functional Teams ◽  
Development Course

This learning innovation article’s purpose is to provide educators with a course assessment tool that can be used to improve student outcomes in an undergraduate, production innovation, and development course, comprised of cross-functional teams (business and engineering students). We demonstrate how over a period of three years, we used the assessment tool to help make course changes that would influence student learning outcomes. In addition, we illustrate how the tool helped us to focus on particular student skills, make specific changes targeted at selected skills, and measure if these course changes were effective with engineering student outcomes.

Practical High Resolution Microscopy

1968 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 302-303
Author(s):  
P. A. Marsh ◽  
T. Mullens ◽  
D. Price
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Magnetic Fields ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Resolving Power ◽  
Careful Attention ◽  
Electron Microscopes ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
High Resolution Microscopy ◽  
New Facilities

It is possible to exceed the guaranteed resolution on most electron microscopes by careful attention to microscope parameters essential for high resolution work. While our experience is related to a Philips EM-200, we hope that some of these comments will apply to all electron microscopes.The first considerations are vibration and magnetic fields. These are usually measured at the pre-installation survey and must be within specifications. It has been our experience, however, that these factors can be greatly influenced by the new facilities and therefore must be rechecked after the installation is completed. The relationship between the resolving power of an EM-200 and the maximum tolerable low frequency interference fields in milli-Oerstedt is 10 Å - 1.9, 8 Å - 1.4, 6 Å - 0.8.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document