scholarly journals Russia and the Eurasian economic Union: a comparative analysis of the sectoral structure of the economy and industrial policy

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Dorzhieva
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Industrial Policy ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
Member States ◽  
Mutual Trade ◽  
Sectoral Structure ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
National Economies

The main objectives of the Eurasian economic Union (EAEU), as an international economic integration, are to increase the sustainability of socio-economic development and competitiveness of industrial complexes of the member States on the basis of the formation of a new model of development and implementation of a coordinated industrial policy. The main feature of the EAEU is the clear dominance of Russia in a number of indicators, including population, GDP, industrial production, exports and imports, mutual trade, and investment. It is proved that the considered economic integration as a whole led to the change after a long-term decline in the negative dynamics of GDP to positive according to official statistics and analytical reports of international organizations for the period 2013–2018 at the expense of a coordinated industrial policy. Namely, industrial policy determines the vector of modernization of national economies and regulates the volume and sectoral structure of GDP. The features and tools of industrial policy strategies implementation are revealed. In accordance with the classification of industrial development strategies adopted by the UN conference on trade and development (UNCTAD), the article defines the types and tools of applied industrial policy strategies in the EAEU member States. The results of cross-country comparisons of the main macroeconomic indicators show that the structure of national economies and the level of socio-economic development of the EAEU member States are uneven and differ significantly. At the same time, the structure of the national economy of Russia does not meet modern challenges in comparison with such developed countries as the USA and Germany. A special role in the EAEU is played by mutual trade, demonstrating much greater resistance to crisis processes, and foreign trade with third countries. The transition to a coordinated industrial policy contributes to the strengthening of intra-sectoral nature of mutual trade in the EAEU.

The Competitiveness of the Industrial Sector of the National Economies within the Setting of the Eurasian Economic Union

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 631
Author(s):  
Perizat ORYNBET ◽  
Meirambala Beisembekovna SEISEKENOVA ◽  
Gaukhar SAKHANOVA ◽  
Yelena Ivanovna LADANENKO ◽  
Larisa A. KAPUSTYAN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Foreign Trade ◽  
Industrial Production ◽  
Industrial Sector ◽  
Competitive Advantages ◽  
Market Place ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
National Economies

This research examines the competitive advantages of the industrial sector of the national economies within the setting of the Eurasian Economic Union. The authors have analyzed a set of indicators of socio-economic development in the member states, including mutual and foreign trade, GDP, and key trends in industrial production. Special attention is devoted to the competitive advantages of Kazakhstan in the pharmaceutical and chemical industries. The authors have assessed the level of competitiveness of Kazakhstan-made products in the Union’s market place.

scholarly journals National priorities and prospects for the development of the Eurasian Economic Integration

2021 ◽  
pp. 33-74
Author(s):  
Marina Lvovna Vartanova
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
Fundamental Nature ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Current State ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Soviet Space ◽  
Positive Impression ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
Considerable Benefit

The chapter "National Priorities and Prospects for the Development of the Eurasian Economic Integration" is devoted to such issues as modern integration processes and prospects for the socio-economic development of the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union. The author describes the trends, problems, and contradictions of integration processes, and substantiates proposals for improving the effectiveness of building a new integration association in the post-Soviet space. A very positive impression on the reader is made by the thoroughness, the fundamental nature of the work under consideration, and the author's coverage of numerous aspects of the complex and acutely topical problem of the current state of the Eurasian Economic Union. This chapter will also be of undoubted and considerable benefit to all those who are interested in the problems of the formation of the Eurasian Economic Union.

scholarly journals KAZAKHSTAN IN THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNIT. RESULTS OF THE FIRST FIVE YEARS

2021 ◽  
pp. 111-121
Author(s):  
Daulet SAUTBEKOV ◽  
Erlan KYLBAYEV
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
International Trade ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
National Economy ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Subsequent Period ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
The Republic

The article discusses topical issues of economic integration of Kazakhstan within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). Individual indicators of the socio-economic development of the republic on the eve of joining the EAEU and in the subsequent period of Kazakhstan's presence in the integration association are analyzed, tables and diagrams are compiled, reflecting the dynamics of the development of the national economy. The main problems in the structure of the economy of Kazakhstan are highlighted and some mechanisms for their solution are proposed. It is concluded that the integration potential of Kazakhstan is not fully utilized, certain industries have not been developed in the context of international trade, and the development of cooperative ties with the EAEU countries requires the use of additional measures in the investment and industrial policy of Kazakhstan. At the same time, in the changing conditions of international trade, Kazakhstan has the opportunity to strengthen its position, and integration opportunities can become a driver of economic growth in the coming years despite criticism from skeptics.

The role of standardization as a key Tool of Quality Economics in the development of integration of the Eurasian Economic Union

2019 ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
V. V. Okrepilov ◽  
A. G. Gridasov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Integration ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Regulatory Framework ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Member States ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Goods And Services ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Economic Union

The presented study examines the experience of forming a regulatory framework for the integration of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) member states through the example of standardization as one of the key tools of quality economics.Aim. The study analyzes the major solutions of the EAEU authorities and member countries aimed at increasing the role of standardization in the economic integration of the Union over five years of its existence.Tasks. The authors identify efficient methods for developing standardization for the integration of the EAEU states as well as the most problematic aspects in this field that need to be taken into account in the qualitative strengthening of the Union’s economy.Methods. This study uses general scientific methods of cognition to examine the activities of the EAEU authorities and member states aimed at creating a system for the economic integration of the Union during a period of its transition from separate national markets towards a single (common) market.Results. Over five years of operation in the field of stadardization, the Eurasian Economic Union has created the necessary organizational and legal framework to ensure the successful development of integration processes. The national legislation on standardization has been modernized with allowance for the harmonization of these laws. In the next five-six years, the development of international standards for 40 technical regulations is expected to be completed, which would create a regulatory framework for unhindered interaction between all participants of the single (common) EAEU market. Conclusions. The analysis of activities in the field of standardization reveals a sufficiently thought-out and coordinated policy of the EAEU states in creating the necessary conditions for overcoming legal and administrative barriers in the movement of goods and services within the common economic space of the EAEU.

scholarly journals Putin's and Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union: A hybrid half-economics and half-political “Janus Bifrons”

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno S. Sergi
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
Industrial Production ◽  
Political Agenda ◽  
Regional Economic Integration ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Soviet Space ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
Post Soviet Space

The Eurasian Economic Union is an institution formalized in January 2015 for the purpose of regional economic integration; it includes five countries: Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan, and may include Mongolia and Tajikistan in the future. With a GDP of $1.59 trillion in 2015, an industrial production of $1.3 trillion in 2014, and population of almost 200 million as of 2016, the EEAU could represent a geopolitical success that supports both Putin's ambitious political agenda and the Union's economic prospects. Although the efforts of this Union are ongoing and long-term success is not certain, the Russia-led Eurasian Economic Union can be considered a hybrid half-economics and half-political “Janus Bifrons” that serves as a powerful illustration of what Putin envisions for the post-Soviet space. Despite promising steps so far, more should be done toward the achievement of economic development and balanced opportunity for all Eurasian countries. Russia's longstanding role within the Union, as well as its power and political motivations, are all considerations that must be accounted for.

Innovative and investment potential of the economic development of the EAEU

2021 ◽  
pp. 666-678
Author(s):  
Inna Nikolaevna Rykova ◽  
Roman Sergeevich Gubanov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Foreign Trade ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Retail Trade ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Member States ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Economic Union

The article defines the innovative potential of the member countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter — the EAEU, the Union), assesses the structural ratio of trade in agricultural products in the total food consumption of the EAEU. The internal investment potential of the EAEU countries is described. The article considers the mechanism of foreign direct investment as a tool for increasing the gross value added of goods during their cross-border movement in the member countries of the Eurasian Economic Union. The dynamics of retail trade turnover in the EAEU is presented. At the same time, in the global aspect, topical issues of the quality of investments in the agro-industrial complex are touched upon, since their volumes do not meet the needs of financial support. At the same time, the mechanism of accelerating the turnover of investment capital is analyzed through the prism of identifying and assessing the state of poverty in rural areas as a risk factor for the agro — food policy of the EAEU member states. At the same time, it is most important to increase the level of food independence of the EAEU member states, to ensure conditions for the growth of the number of new high — performance jobs. The issues of production and consumption of marketable products in the EAEU member states are studied, taking into account the dynamics of prices and the socio-economic situation in the foreign trade space. Based on the generalization of the experience of integration associations of the world economic system, the article concludes that it is necessary to introduce a comprehensive intellectual system into the value chain of commodity products created in the analyzed states. The authors systematize the priorities of the conceptual development of economic relations in the integration of foreign trade processes in the EAEU until 2030. In the system of assessing the mechanism of cross-border traffic through the EAEU, the authors focus on the issues of optimizing the speed of delivery of goods from the seller to the consumer and the modernization of the road transport and logistics infrastructure of the member states of the Union. Based on the analysis of the logistics efficiency index in foreign countries, the necessary conditions for achieving the key effects of the economic development of the EAEU until 2030 are proposed.

scholarly journals Development of scientific and technical potential in the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union

2020 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. 11017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Gibadullin ◽  
Valentina Pulyaeva ◽  
Tufa Usmanova ◽  
Irina Ivanova ◽  
Larisa Vlasenko
Keyword(s):  
System Analysis ◽  
Member States ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Technological Potential ◽  
Technical Potential ◽  
Digital Development ◽  
Logical Method ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
National Economies ◽  
Internal Costs

The purpose of the article is the analysis and development of scientific and technological potential in the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union. In the presented material, based on the use of the system analysis method, the scientific and technical potential of the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Union was investigated. Then, using the logical method, it was revealed that the number of research centres was reduced, the volume of internal costs for research and development was reduced, and the number of personnel employed in the scientific and technical field was reduced. In the study, using statistical and comparative methods, it was found that up to 90% of the scientific and technical potential is concentrated in the Russian Federation. The paper analyzed the digital transformation of national economies, which established that states have digital potential, created conditions for its development, but there is an uneven distribution of innovative and digital infrastructure in the territory of the Eurasian Economic Union, which complicates the development of scientific and technological potential. In the study, using factor analysis, a conceptual model for the development of scientific and technological potential was proposed, which will ensure a rational and effective policy in the field of innovative and digital development of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union. In the ending of the study the main conclusions and results of the work are presented.

scholarly journals Состояние и перспективы развития овощеводства в странах Евразийского экономического союза

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.F. Razin ◽  
R.A. Meshcheryakova ◽  
M.V. Shatilov ◽  
O.A. Razin ◽  
T.N. Surikhina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Global Economy ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Vegetable Production ◽  
Kyrgyz Republic ◽  
Vegetable Crops ◽  
Member States ◽  
Mutual Trade ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Fresh Vegetables ◽  
Economic Union

Целями основания Евразийского экономического союза (ЕАЭС) было создание условий для стабильного развития экономик государств членов союза в интересах повышения жизненного уровня их населения, стремление к формированию единого рынка товаров, услуг, капитала и трудовых ресурсов, всесторонняя модернизация, кооперация и повышение конкурентоспособности национальных экономик государств членов союза в условиях глобальной экономики. Цель исследования проанализировать состояние овощеводства и обеспеченность овощами населения стран членов Евразийского экономического союза в составе Республик Армения, Беларусь, Казахстан, Кыргызской Республики и Российской Федерации. По итогам проведенного анализа установлено, что в период 20132017 годов посевные площади овощных культур в ЕАЭС выросли на 7,7 и превысили 1 млн га. В 2018 году валовой сбор овощей увеличился на 13 до 24,1 млн т. При этом более 62 овощей производится в хозяйствах населения и 22 в КФХ, что говорит о мелкотоварном характере производства и низкой товарности продукции в ЕАЭС. Лидер по производству овощей на душу населения Армения (324 кг/чел.), наименьшее значение в России 111 кг/чел., среднее по ЕАЭС 131 кг/чел. Урожай овощных культур увеличился во всех государствах членах союза, за исключением Армении, где этот показатель максимальный в рамках союза 286 кг/га. Объем импорта свежих овощей из третьих стран в период 20142017 годах снизился на 16,8 в натуральном выражении и на 33,4 до 1,8 млрд в денежном исчислении, что обусловлено введением продуктового эмбарго и снижением объема импорта в Россию практически в два раза. Взаимная торговля (по экспорту) свежими овощами увеличилась на 36,4 до 241 млн . Около 77 объема взаимной торговли приходится на поставки из Беларуси, при этом более 90 объема взаимной торговли овощами направлены на рынок России. Одной из мер по поддержке и развитию отрасли овощеводства могут стать: снижение доли посредников в потребительской цене на овощи, строительство тепличных комплексов для производства отечественных овощей в несезонный период и овощехранилищ и др.The objectives of founding the Eurasian economic Union (EAEU) was the creation of conditions for stable development of the economies of the member States of the Union to improve the living standards of their populations, the desire to create a common market of goods, services, capital and labor resources, comprehensive modernization, cooperation and competitiveness of national economies of member States of the Union in the global economy. The purpose of the study is to analyze the state of vegetable production and the availability of vegetables for the population of the member States of the Eurasian economic Union in the Republics of Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation. According to the results of the analysis, it was found that in the period 20132017, the acreage of vegetable crops in the EAEU increased by 7.7 and exceeded 1 million hectares. In 2018, the gross harvest of vegetables increased by 13 to 24.1 million tons. at the same time, more than 62 of vegetables are produced in households and 22 in farms, which indicates the small-scale nature of production and low marketability of products in the EAEU. The leader in the production of vegetables per capita is Armenia (324 kg/person), the lowest value in Russia is 111 kg/person, the average for the EEU is 131 kg/person. The yield of vegetable crops increased in all member States of the Union, with the exception of Armenia, where this figure is the maximum within the Union 286 kg/ha. The volume of imports of fresh vegetables from third countries in the period 20142017 decreased by 16.8 in physical terms and by 33.4 to 1.8 billion in monetary terms, due to the introduction of the food embargo and a decrease in the volume of imports to Russia almost twice. Mutual trade (by export) in fresh vegetables increased by 36.4 to 241 million. About 77 of the volume of mutual trade comes from Belarus, while more than 90 of the volume of mutual trade in vegetables is directed to the Russian market. One of the measures to support and develop the vegetable industry can be: reducing the share of intermediaries in the consumer price of vegetables, construction of greenhouse complexes for the production of domestic vegetables in the off-season period and vegetable stores, etc.

scholarly journals Interaction of the Eurasian Economic Union and its member states in the sphere of agriculture

2021 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 491-501
Author(s):  
Mark Entin ◽  
Dmitriy Galushko
Keyword(s):  
Economic Integration ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
International Experience ◽  
Institutional Structure ◽  
Member States ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
Economic Union

The aim of the paper is to consider the international experience of delineating spheres of responsibility of national and supranational regulators in the sphere of agriculture on the example of the Eurasian Economic Union. Used philosophical, general scientific and special methods helped to provide an assessment of the process, which shows that, due to the incompleteness of the process of economic integration, the existing institutional structure of the Union cannot be considered as finalized, and therefore the assignment of certain powers to the Union's bodies is situational, which prevents the formulation of final conclusions on the specifics of delimiting the spheres of responsibility of national and supranational regulators and the boundaries of powers of national regulators in the agricultural sector. The authors concluded that Eurasian Economic Commission's powers and competence in the sphere of agriculture should be expanded in order to achieve aims of the integration entity.

scholarly journals IDENTIFICATION OF PRIORITY AREAS OF FOREIGN POLICIES OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BILATERAL COOPERATION

2020 ◽  
pp. 5-11
Author(s):  
N. A. Efimova
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Policy ◽  
Member States ◽  
Policy Issues ◽  
Priority Areas ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Foreign Policies ◽  
Economic Interaction ◽  
Bilateral Cooperation ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
National Economies

The article is devoted to identifying priority areas of foreign policy of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter – EAEU) member states in the framework of bilateral cooperation, reflected in national legal and other acts and documents, determining the main vector of the implemented foreign policy of each of the EAEU member states. As a result of the study, it has been concluded, that foreign policy issues are solved by each member of the EAEU independently. The lack of coordinated approaches to the implementation of the foreign policy activities of the EAEU member states, including in the framework of bilateral cooperation, cannot but affect the development of all economic integration. This mediates the need to model a coordinated approach to the implementation of the foreign policy of the EAEU member states as an integration unity, within the framework of which the interests of each EAEU member will be taken into account, together with the interests of the organization. This will contribute to enhancing the economic interaction of the national economies of the EAEU members and to strengthening the integration potential of the EAEU, which in the context of increasing geopolitical tension is especially relevant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document