scholarly journals A Sebészeti Beavatkozástól Való Félelem Kérdőív magyar nyelvű változatának reliabilitás- és validitásvizsgálata sebészeti beavatkozáson átesett páciensek körében

2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (47) ◽  
pp. 1988-1993
Author(s):  
Victoria Wittmann ◽  
Márta Csabai ◽  
Gergely Drótos ◽  
György Lázár
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Healing Process ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Substantial Effect ◽  
Interdisciplinary Studies ◽  
Excellent Internal Consistency ◽  
Psychometric Tool ◽  
Anxiety Depression ◽  
Hungarian Version

Abstract: Introduction: Interdisciplinary studies confirm that surgical fear experienced by patients can have a substantial effect on the outcome of the surgery and the healing process after surgery. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire in cancer patients. Method: 149 patients were assessed using the Spielberger Anxiety Inventory, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Visual Analogue Scale and the Surgical Fear Questionnaire. Results: The scale showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach-alfa = 0.878; 0.885). The Surgical Fear Questionnaire scores moderately correlated with anxiety, depression and anticipated pain after surgery. Conclusion: The reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire in the sample were excellent. The questionnaire turned out to be a useful psychometric tool in the measurement of surgical fear. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(47): 1988–1993.

scholarly journals A Rövid Betegségpercepció Kérdőív magyar változatának megbízhatósági vizsgálata

2021 ◽  
Vol 162 (6) ◽  
pp. 212-218
Author(s):  
Melinda Látos ◽  
György Lázár ◽  
Márta Csabai
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Posttraumatic Growth ◽  
Healing Process ◽  
Illness Perception ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Interdisciplinary Studies ◽  
Illness Perception Questionnaire ◽  
Hungarian Version ◽  
Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: Interdiszciplináris kutatásokkal igazolták, hogy a páciensnek a betegségéről kialakított elképzelései meghatározó szerepet játszanak a gyógyulási folyamat sikerességében. Célkitűzés: Vizsgálatunk célja az ezen elképzelések felmérésére kifejlesztett Rövid Betegségpercepció Kérdőív magyar nyelvű változatának megbízhatósági és validitási vizsgálata krónikus betegségben szenvedő, daganattal küzdő és transzplantált páciensek körében. Módszer: Keresztmetszeti vizsgálatunkban 490 páciens vett részt. A kérdőív validitásának vizsgálatára a Spielberger-féle Állapot- és Vonásszorongás Kérdőívet, a Beck Depresszió Kérdőívet és a Poszttraumás Növekedésérzés Kérdőívet alkalmaztuk, illetve felmértük a betegcsoportok életminőségét. Eredmények: A kérdőív belső megbízhatósága, a teszt-reteszt megbízhatósága kiváló. A konstruktumvaliditást vizsgálva közepesen erős összefüggést találtunk a szorongás, a depresszió, a poszttraumás növekedésérzés, az életminőség és a Rövid Betegségpercepció Kérdőív között. A prediktív validitást vizsgálva igazolást nyert, hogy a betegségpercepció összefüggésben áll a veseműködést jelző eGFR-szinttel (p = 0,027). A kérdőív diszkrimináns validitását igazolta, hogy képes különbséget tenni a különböző betegcsoportok között. Következtetés: A Rövid Betegségpercepció Kérdőív magyar verziójának reliabilitása és validitása a vizsgált populáción jónak mutatkozott. A kérdőív megbízható információt ad a pácienseknek a betegségükről kialakított elképzeléseiről. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(6): 212–218. Summary. Introduction: Interdisciplinary studies confirm that patients’ illness perception can have a substantial effect on the healing process. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire in chronic disease, cancer, and transplant patients. Method: 490 patients were assessed using the Spielberger Anxiety Inventory, the Beck Depression Inventory, Posttraumatic Growth Inventory and quality of life questionnaires. Results: The scale showed good internal consistency, and the test-retest reliability was excellent. The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire scores moderately correlated with anxiety, depression, posttraumatic growth and quality of life. Examining predictive validity, the questionnaire correlated with eGFR level (p = 0.027). The discriminant validity of the questionnaire was supported by its ability to distinguish between different patient groups. Conclusion: The reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire in the sample were excellent. The questionnaire turned out to be a useful psychometric tool in the measurement of illness perception. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(6): 212–218.

scholarly journals Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA)

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 474-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jussi P. Repo ◽  
Erkki J. Tukiainen ◽  
Risto P. Roine ◽  
Hannu Kautiainen ◽  
Jan Lindahl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Foot And Ankle

Reliability and validity of the pain observation scale for young children and the visual analogue scale in children with burns

Burns ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.E.E. de Jong ◽  
M. Bremer ◽  
M. Schouten ◽  
W.E. Tuinebreijer ◽  
A.W. Faber
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Observation Scale

Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne M. Boonstra ◽  
Henrica R. Schiphorst Preuper ◽  
Michiel F. Reneman ◽  
Jitze B. Posthumus ◽  
Roy E. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Musculoskeletal Pain ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

scholarly journals A pszichológiai reprezentációk szerepe a vesetranszplantációban. A Transzplantált Szerv Kérdőív magyar változatának reliabilitás- és validitásvizsgálata

2016 ◽  
Vol 157 (10) ◽  
pp. 385-391
Author(s):  
Melinda Látos ◽  
György Lázár ◽  
Victoria Wittmann ◽  
Márta Csabai
Keyword(s):  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Posttraumatic Growth ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Successful Transplantation ◽  
Psychometric Tool ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Hungarian Version

Introduction: According to interdisciplinary research the transplanted organ representations play an important role in successful transplantation. Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of Transplanted Organ Questionnaire in kidney transplant recipients. Method: 151 patients were assessed using the Spielberger Anxiety Inventory, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory and the Transplanted Organ Questionnaire. Serum creatinine levels from routine clinical blood tests were collected. Results: The scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach-alpha = 0.89; 0.87; 0.80), and the test-retest reliability was excellent. The Transplanted Organ Questionnaire scores moderately correlated with depression, anxiety and posttraumatic growth. The “Psychological rejection” scale correlated with higher serum creatinine level (p = 0.001, t = 5.17). Conclusions: The reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of Transplanted Organ Questionnaire in the studied sample were excellent. The questionnaire is a useful psychometric tool in the exploration of transplant patients’ representations about the donor and the organ. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(10), 385–391.

scholarly journals Assessment of reliability and validity of the mental chronometry task based on the box and block test in multiple sclerosis patients

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Motor Imagery ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Mental Chronometry ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis Patients ◽  
Block Test ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Objectives: Motor imagery (MI) is the visualization of action without its overt performance. One of the measures of explicit MI is mental chronometry which has been applied to multiple sclerosis (MS) patients; nonetheless, the reliability and validity of this tool has been never confirmed. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of mental chronometry in MS patients. Methods: A number of 60 MS patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the present study via the census method. Thereafter, 20 MS patients were tested via mental chronometry based on the box and block test, as well as kinesthetic and visual imagery questionnaire-20 (KVIQ-20) in two sessions with a 10-day interval. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to determine the test-retest reliability of mental chronometry. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to evaluate criterion validity with the KVIQ-20. Results: The test-retest reliability for the mental chronometry was good (ICCs: visual analogue scale=0.88, mean execution and motor imagery absolute difference= 0.75, imagery duration=0.91, and execution duration=0.97). Moreover, the concurrent validity between the visual analogue scale of mental chronometry and KVIQ-20 was good. Conclusion: As evidenced by the results of the present study, the mental chronometry based on box and block is a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of motor imagery in MS patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document