scholarly journals Personality Types and Learning Styles of Collegiate Aviation Students

Author(s):  
Stephanie Fussell ◽  
Andrew Dattel ◽  
Kadie Mullins
2018 ◽  
pp. 912-934
Author(s):  
Vicki Caravias

This paper presents a critical review and synthesis of research literature in higher education exploring teachers' conceptions of blended learning and their approaches to both design and teaching. Definitions of blended learning and conceptual frameworks are considered first. Attention is given to Picciano's Blending with Purpose Multimodal framework. This paper builds upon previous research on blended learning and conceptual framework by Picciano by exploring how objectives from Picciano's framework affect teachers' approaches to both design and teaching in face-to-face and online settings. Research results suggest that teachers use multiple approaches including face-to-face methods and online technologies that address the learning needs of a variety of students from different generations, personality types and learning styles.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1681347
Author(s):  
Lida Foroozandehfar ◽  
Gholamhassan Famil Khalili ◽  
Jeroen van de Weijer

1990 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Atkinson ◽  
Patricia H. Murrell ◽  
Michael R Winters

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Niken Titi Pratitis

Abstract. This study aims to determine the effect of creativity in shaping the student coping strategy mainly by distinguishing personality type (ie based on the type of Dominance, Influence, Steadiness and Complience and differentiate learning styles (ie visual learning style, auditory and kinestesik). Variables consisted of variables depending Strategy coping and three independent variables, namely Creativity, Personality Types and Learning Styles. models are quantitative study with 38 study subjects at the end of the semester students of the Faculty of Psychology, University of Surabaya August 17, 1945. research data retrieval is done by deploying scale two of them made by a team of researchers and one scale using standard scales that have proven validity reliability. regression analysis by ANOVA using SPSS version 20 ( IBM version) shows that creativity plays a role in shaping the individual coping strategies. separately but not learning styles play a role in shaping the coping strategies despite a role in creativity individuals, where the t-test results illustrate that there are significant differences in creativity between the visual and auditory learning styles. opposite, personality type does not affect creativity but affect the individual coping strategies, although the results of the t test shows that only dominance and Steadiness personality and influence by complience which have significant differences in coping strategies.Keywords : Coping Strategies , Creativity , Personality Types , Learning Styles


Author(s):  
Marketa Schublova

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the preferred learning style and personality types of freshman-level pre-athletic training students. The secondary purpose was to identify any possible differences in learning styles and personality types of students admitted into the athletic training program versus those that were denied admission or changed their major. Methods: Data collection took place during a college introductory course over a period of seven years. Four hundred seventy-two freshmen (188 men, 284 women; average age 18.66 ± 0.87 years) considering athletic training as their major at a CAATE-accredited athletic training program participated in this study. A 48-item Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory questionnaire and 126-question Myers-Briggs Type Indicator form G were used to determine students’ preferred learning style and personality types. Results: The most common personality types among pre-athletic training students were Extraversion, Sensing, Thinking, Perception (ESTP) (14.2%) and Introversion, Sensing, Thinking, Judging (ISTJ) (13.3%), and 35.8% of pre-athletic training students preferred accommodator learning style. However, converger learning style was the most common (30%) among students admitted into the athletic training program. The most common personality type for students admitted into the athletic training program was Extraversion, Sensing, Thinking, Judging (ESTJ). This was true for both groups of admitted and not admitted students. Personality types of students specific to their preferred learning styles were also examined. Accommodators placed in Extraverted, Sensing, Thinking, Judging (ESTJ) category (21%), divergers in Extraverted, Sensing, Feeling, Judging (ESFJ) category (14.9%), convergers in Extraverted, Sensing, Thinking, Perception (ESTP) (22%), and assimilators in Extraverted, Sensing, Thinking, Judging (ESTJ) (14.7%) category. Conclusions: Based on the findings of this study, freshman pre-athletic training students demonstrated great diversity in their learning styles and personality types. These students prefer hands-on learning, rely on each other to solve a problem, enjoy solving problems, and excel in finding practical use while learning. They benefit from multimodal teaching methods. Educators should consider integrating concrete and abstract material into the curriculum. Athletic training students need to have the ability to participate in all different learning style preferences because athletic training is a science–based profession where abstract conceptualization is important along with effective interpersonal relationships with their patients and ability to act effectively in critical situations.


Author(s):  
Anthony A. Nix ◽  
Robert B. Stone

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator test is known to be a quick and easy way to build good team dynamics. However the workplace is not always built around four person teams that you can easily change based on individual personalities. Research has shown that the various MBTI personalities associate with different learning styles. This gives reason to believe that different individual designers may synthesize data and conceptualize ideas differently in a design environment. If this is true, designers may need a customizable environment or they may need to explore different ways to achieve their potential. This paper examines how individuals with different MBTI personality types take in and view information during the conceptualization stages of product design and whether the way information is inputed is vital to an innovative product design.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document