Chapter 13—Bone Graft Substitutes: Basic Information for Successful Clinical Use with Special Focus on Synthetic Graft Substitutes

2009 ◽  
pp. 231-231-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
CT Laurencin ◽  
M Agrawal ◽  
DS Katti ◽  
BD Boyan ◽  
J McMillan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Basic Information ◽  
Synthetic Graft ◽  
Bone Graft Substitutes

Application of BMP-2 for bone graft in Dentistry

RSBO ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Lídia Audrey Rocha Valadas Marques ◽  
Edvan Alves da Costa Júnior ◽  
Mara Assef Leitão Lotif ◽  
Edilson Martins Rodrigues Neto ◽  
Francisco Filipe Carvalho da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Bone Graft ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Tooth Loss ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Increase Life Expectancy ◽  
Bone Replacement ◽  
Morphogenetic Protein ◽  
The Face ◽  
Global Increase

Introduction: The global increase life expectancy and the resulting tooth loss has required searching for new rehabilitation alternatives in Dentistry. Biomaterials can be defined as any material that acts replacing a lost bone defect and its function. In Dentistry, many studies have aimed to improve bone regeneration through the use of BMPs for bone replacement. Objective: To review the literature on the use and clinical viability of human morphogenetic protein for the jaws reconstruction. Material and methods: The following databases were searched: Pubmed, Bireme, Lilacs, and Scielo and 30 articles published between 1965 and 2013 were found using the following descriptors: “dental implants”, “maxillary sinus”, and “biocompatible materials”. Results: Several studies demonstrate the biological advantages of rhBMP-2 on bone regeneration of the jaws. In recent years, morphogenetic protein has presented a large clinical use. Conclusion: Despite being a high-cost biomaterial, rhBMP-2 is a viable and very effective alternative for reconstruction of defects of the face.

scholarly journals Synthetic bone graft versus autograft or allograft for spinal fusion: a systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 509-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zorica Buser ◽  
Darrel S. Brodke ◽  
Jim A. Youssef ◽  
Hans-Joerg Meisel ◽  
Sue Lynn Myhre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Bone Graft ◽  
Spinal Fusion ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Retrospective Studies ◽  
Synthetic Bone ◽  
Synthetic Bone Graft ◽  
Bone Graft Substitutes

The purpose of this review was to compare the efficacy and safety of synthetic bone graft substitutes versus autograft or allograft for the treatment of lumbar and cervical spinal degenerative diseases. Multiple major medical reference databases were searched for studies that evaluated spinal fusion using synthetic bone graft substitutes (either alone or with an autograft or allograft) compared with autograft and allograft. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and cohort studies with more than 10 patients were included. Radiographic fusion, patient-reported outcomes, and functional outcomes were the primary outcomes of interest. The search yielded 214 citations with 27 studies that met the inclusion criteria. For the patients with lumbar spinal degenerative disease, data from 19 comparative studies were included: 3 RCTs, 12 prospective, and 4 retrospective studies. Hydroxyapatite (HA), HA+collagen, β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), calcium sulfate, or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) were used. Overall, there were no differences between the treatment groups in terms of fusion, functional outcomes, or complications, except in 1 study that found higher rates of HA graft absorption. For the patients with cervical degenerative conditions, data from 8 comparative studies were included: 4 RCTs and 4 cohort studies (1 prospective and 3 retrospective studies). Synthetic grafts included HA, β-TCP/HA, PMMA, and biocompatible osteoconductive polymer (BOP). The PMMA and BOP grafts led to lower fusion rates, and PMMA, HA, and BOP had greater risks of graft fragmentation, settling, and instrumentation problems compared with iliac crest bone graft. The overall quality of evidence evaluating the potential use and superiority of the synthetic biological materials for lumbar and cervical fusion in this systematic review was low or insufficient, largely due to the high potential for bias and small sample sizes. Thus, definitive conclusions or recommendations regarding the use of these synthetic materials should be made cautiously and within the context of the limitations of the evidence.

A Novelty of Synthetic Hydroxyapatite from Cockle Shell and Characterization

2015 ◽  
Vol 1087 ◽  
pp. 429-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rusnah Mustaffa ◽  
Mohd Reusmaazran Mohd Yusof ◽  
Yusof Abdullah
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Bone Repair ◽  
Artificial Bone ◽  
Synthetic Bone ◽  
Potential Source ◽  
Mineral Constituent ◽  
Bone Graft Substitutes ◽  
Synthetic Hydroxyapatite ◽  
Anadara Granosa ◽  
Cockle Shell

In Malaysia recently, it was found that cockle shell (Anadara granosa) is a potential source of biomaterial for bone repair. It is the most abundant sea species cultured in Malaysia. A possible advantage of using cockle shell as a biomaterial is that they may act as an antilog of calcium carbonate. Malaysian Nuclear Agency took this challenge to develop synthetic bone graft from natural cockle shell. To date, the artificial bone graft substitutes developed from hydroxyapatite (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2) a bio ceramic is similar to the mineral constituent of human bone. The structure and the composition of hydroxyapatite (HA) are similar to the mineral phase of bone and, its bioactivity and biocompatibility makes it a preferred bone graft.

A Review of Bone Graft Substitutes Made From HA-Polymer Composite Scaffolds and Fabrication Potential With Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing Processes

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hera Wu ◽  
Shuting Lei
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Bone Graft ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Bone Graft Substitute ◽  
Biological Properties ◽  
Porous Scaffolds ◽  
Composite Scaffolds ◽  
Bone Graft Substitutes ◽  
Manufacturing Technologies ◽  
High Level

Hydroxyapatite, a bioactive ceramic, has been combined with biodegradable polymers to create composite three-dimensional interconnected porous scaffolds for bone graft substitutes. The materials and fabrication methods of these composite scaffolds are reviewed. The resulting mechanical and biological properties of scaffolds produced from the combination of certain materials and fabrication methods are analyzed. Requirements for a bone graft substitute and third generation scaffolds with the addition of osteoinductive and osteogenic features to composite scaffolds including biomolecule delivery and cell seeding are also introduced. Finally, the benefits of using additive manufacturing technologies to enable high level of control over the design of interconnected pore structure are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document