scholarly journals Individualized Education Program (IEP) Mata Pelajaran Kimia untuk Siswa Slow Learner

INKLUSI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Rovik Rovik

The implementation of inclusive education is one of the government's efforts to providing quality education for all levels of society. However, to date, inclusive education is not working correctly, students with special needs must adapt to learning tailored to their abilities, interests and talents (integration education). As a result, they can not achieve learning objectives, and the worst thing is they will stay class or drop out. A slow learner is one type of disability who received less attention because of its vagueness, so their existence is difficult to identify. IEP (Individualized Education Program) for slow learners can help them achieve progress. Index of inclusion in this research was used to determine the extent of successes of inclusive schools in implementing inclusive education, while the assessment was done to determine the capabilities and needs of the learners.[Siswa slow learner menempati populasi tertinggi untuk siswa berkebutuhan khusus. Sebagai salah satu jenis learning disability, slow learner masih dapat belajar dengan teman sebayanya asalkan guru mempersiapkan program pembelajaran khusus yang telah dimodifikasi dari pembelajaran reguler. Program ini disebut Individualized Education Program (IEP). Penelitian ini mencoba mengembangkan IEP mata pelajaran kimia untuk slow learner, mengidentifikasi komponen yang dibutuhkan dalam menyusun IEP untuk slow learner, dan menganalisis judgement reviewers (guru kimia dan guru pendamping khusus) dan peer reviewers terhadap IEP yang dikembangkan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan slow learner membutuhkan IEP sebagai dokumen utama panduan guru dalam pembelajaran kimia di kelas. Komponen pengembangan IEP meliputi identitas peserta didik, tim pengembangan dan pelaksana, asesmen yang pernah dilakukan, hambatan dan kekuatan, kebutuhan dan perlakuan, faktor pendukung dan penghambat, rencana perlakuan, dan modifikasi terhadap perangkat pembelajaran kimia reguler]

INKLUSI ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 179
Author(s):  
Subar Junanto ◽  
Nur Arini Asmaul Kusna

The Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model is commonly used to evaluate a program, including a learning program. This study aimed at assessing the implementation of the learning program in Inclusive Early Childhood Education (PAUD) using the CIPP model. This is a qualitative study at the Lazuardi Kamila GIS Surakarta Pre-kindergarten and Kindergarten. Data are collected through observation and interviews. The finding of the context evaluation showed that in the planning, the therapist and the teacher coordinated to determine the material. The input evaluation showed the availability of necessary facilities provided by the school. In the process evaluation showed that children with disabilities were educated in the same class and curriculum with other students and curriculum; only their assessment was made different as reflected in the IEP (Individualized Education Program). Product evaluation showed that Pra TK-TK Lazuardi Kamila GIS Surakarta has provided an inclusive education.[Evaluasi dengan model Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) digunakan untuk menilai sebuah program, termasuk program pembelajaran. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi pembelajaran di sebuah Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini (PAUD) inklusif dengan menggunakan model evaluasi CIPP. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus di Pra TK dan TK Lazuardi Kamila Global Islamic School Surakarta. Metode pengambilan data meliputi observasi dan wawancara terhadap guru pendamping Khusus (GPK), guru kelas, dan kepala sekolah. Hasil evaluasi context menunjukkan bahwa pada aspek perencanaan pembelajaran, terapis dan guru berkoordinasi untuk menentukan materi yang akan diberikan ke siswa. Evaluasi input menunjukkan  ketersediaan sarana prasarana yang didukung oleh alat-alat dari Pelangi. Evaluasi proses menunjukkan pembelajaran antara peserta didik reguler dengan anak difabel disamakan dan hanya ketika evaluasi untuk anak difabel sesuai dengan IEP (Individualized Education Program) yang telah ditentukan terapis dan guru sentra. Evaluasi produk menunjukkan bahwa layanan inkusi telah dilakukan oleh  lembaga ini.]


2006 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Krishnakumar ◽  
M. G. Geeta ◽  
Ramakrishnan Palat

2004 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Test ◽  
Christine Mason ◽  
Carolyn Hughes ◽  
Moira Konrad ◽  
Melia Neale ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Tracy Gershwin Mueller ◽  
Anna Moriarity Vick

There is limited research about effective Individualized Education Program (IEP) meeting practices that promote family–professional collaboration. One emerging practice, the Facilitated IEP (FIEP) meeting, has recently gained national attention for its team-based approach. In this study, the authors interview 32 FIEP participants about their experiences with the process. Findings reveal five meeting procedures that encourage active team planning, collaboration, and problem solving between families and professionals, including premeeting with families, establishing and following a meeting agenda, using meeting norms, utilizing a parking lot for off-topic issues, and visual charting for graphic support during team discussion and problem solving. In this article, the authors present the implications of these procedural practices as a promising structure for IEP meetings that can be used by professionals to collaborate and involve families throughout the IEP meeting process. Implications for future research are also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document