scholarly journals DNA polymerase IV primarily operates outside of DNA replication forks in Escherichia coli

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e1007161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah S. Henrikus ◽  
Elizabeth A. Wood ◽  
John P. McDonald ◽  
Michael M. Cox ◽  
Roger Woodgate ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Dna Polymerase Iv

scholarly journals Interactions and Localization of Escherichia coli Error-Prone DNA Polymerase IV after DNA Damage

2015 ◽  
Vol 197 (17) ◽  
pp. 2792-2809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarita Mallik ◽  
Ellen M. Popodi ◽  
Andrew J. Hanson ◽  
Patricia L. Foster
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Pol Iv ◽  
Dna Polymerase Iv ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

ABSTRACTEscherichia coli's DNA polymerase IV (Pol IV/DinB), a member of the Y family of error-prone polymerases, is induced during the SOS response to DNA damage and is responsible for translesion bypass and adaptive (stress-induced) mutation. In this study, the localization of Pol IV after DNA damage was followed using fluorescent fusions. After exposure ofE. colito DNA-damaging agents, fluorescently tagged Pol IV localized to the nucleoid as foci. Stepwise photobleaching indicated ∼60% of the foci consisted of three Pol IV molecules, while ∼40% consisted of six Pol IV molecules. Fluorescently tagged Rep, a replication accessory DNA helicase, was recruited to the Pol IV foci after DNA damage, suggesting that thein vitrointeraction between Rep and Pol IV reported previously also occursin vivo. Fluorescently tagged RecA also formed foci after DNA damage, and Pol IV localized to them. To investigate if Pol IV localizes to double-strand breaks (DSBs), an I-SceI endonuclease-mediated DSB was introduced close to a fluorescently labeled LacO array on the chromosome. After DSB induction, Pol IV localized to the DSB site in ∼70% of SOS-induced cells. RecA also formed foci at the DSB sites, and Pol IV localized to the RecA foci. These results suggest that Pol IV interacts with RecAin vivoand is recruited to sites of DSBs to aid in the restoration of DNA replication.IMPORTANCEDNA polymerase IV (Pol IV/DinB) is an error-prone DNA polymerase capable of bypassing DNA lesions and aiding in the restart of stalled replication forks. In this work, we demonstratein vivolocalization of fluorescently tagged Pol IV to the nucleoid after DNA damage and to DNA double-strand breaks. We show colocalization of Pol IV with two proteins: Rep DNA helicase, which participates in replication, and RecA, which catalyzes recombinational repair of stalled replication forks. Time course experiments suggest that Pol IV recruits Rep and that RecA recruits Pol IV. These findings providein vivoevidence that Pol IV aids in maintaining genomic stability not only by bypassing DNA lesions but also by participating in the restoration of stalled replication forks.

scholarly journals Delineation of the Ancestral Tus-Dependent Replication Fork Trap

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Casey Toft ◽  
Morgane Moreau ◽  
Jiri Perutka ◽  
Savitri Mandapati ◽  
Peter Enyeart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Wide Distribution ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Replication Fork Arrest

In Escherichia coli, DNA replication termination is orchestrated by two clusters of Ter sites forming a DNA replication fork trap when bound by Tus proteins. The formation of a ‘locked’ Tus-Ter complex is essential for halting incoming DNA replication forks. However, the absence of replication fork arrest at some Ter sites raised questions about their significance. In this study, we examined the genome-wide distribution of Tus and found that only the six innermost Ter sites (TerA-E and G) were significantly bound by Tus. We also found that a single ectopic insertion of TerB in its non-permissive orientation could not be achieved, advocating against a need for ‘back-up’ Ter sites. Finally, examination of the genomes of a variety of Enterobacterales revealed a new replication fork trap architecture mostly found outside the Enterobacteriaceae family. Taken together, our data enabled the delineation of a narrow ancestral Tus-dependent DNA replication fork trap consisting of only two Ter sites.

scholarly journals The mechanism of recA polA lethality: suppression by RecA-independent recombination repair activated by the lexA(Def) mutation in Escherichia coli.

Genetics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 139 (4) ◽  
pp. 1483-1494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Cao ◽  
T Kogoma
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Reca Protein ◽  
Minor Role ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Restrictive Temperature ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Recombination Repair ◽  
Polymerase I

Abstract The mechanism of recA polA lethality in Escherichia coli has been studied. Complementation tests have indicated that both the 5'-->3' exonuclease and the polymerization activities of DNA polymerase I are essential for viability in the absence of RecA protein, whereas the viability and DNA replication of DNA polymerase I-defective cells depend on the recombinase activity of RecA. An alkaline sucrose gradient sedimentation analysis has indicated that RecA has only a minor role in Okazaki fragment processing. Double-strand break repair is proposed for the major role of RecA in the absence of DNA polymerase I. The lexA(Def)::Tn5 mutation has previously been shown to suppress the temperature-sensitive growth of recA200(Ts) polA25::spc mutants. The lexA(Def) mutation can alleviate impaired DNA synthesis in the recA200(Ts) polA25::spc mutant cells at the restrictive temperature. recF+ is essential for this suppression pathway. recJ and recQ mutations have minor but significant adverse effects on the suppression. The recA200(Ts) allele in the recA200(Ts) polA25::spc lexA(Def) mutant can be replaced by delta recA, indicating that the lexA(Def)-induced suppression is RecA independent. lexA(Def) reduces the sensitivity of delta recA polA25::spc cells to UV damage by approximately 10(4)-fold. lexA(Def) also restores P1 transduction proficiency to the delta recA polA25::spc mutant to a level that is 7.3% of the recA+ wild type. These results suggest that lexA(Def) activates a RecA-independent, RecF-dependent recombination repair pathway that suppresses the defect in DNA replication in recA polA double mutants.

scholarly journals Human and mouse homologs of Escherichia coli DinB (DNA polymerase IV), members of the UmuC/DinB superfamily

1999 ◽  
Vol 96 (21) ◽  
pp. 11922-11927 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. L. Gerlach ◽  
L. Aravind ◽  
G. Gotway ◽  
R. A. Schultz ◽  
E. V. Koonin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Polymerase Iv ◽  
Human And Mouse

scholarly journals Escherichia coli Cells with Increased Levels of DnaA and Deficient in Recombinational Repair Have Decreased Viability

2003 ◽  
Vol 185 (2) ◽  
pp. 630-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline V. Grigorian ◽  
Rachel B. Lustig ◽  
Elena C. Guzmán ◽  
Joseph M. Mahaffy ◽  
Judith W. Zyskind
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Recombinational Repair ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Dna Replication Initiation ◽  
Escherichia Coli Cells ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

ABSTRACT The dnaA operon of Escherichia coli contains the genes dnaA, dnaN, and recF encoding DnaA, β clamp of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, and RecF. When the DnaA concentration is raised, an increase in the number of DNA replication initiation events but a reduction in replication fork velocity occurs. Because DnaA is autoregulated, these results might be due to the inhibition of dnaN and recF expression. To test this, we examined the effects of increasing the intracellular concentrations of DnaA, β clamp, and RecF, together and separately, on initiation, the rate of fork movement, and cell viability. The increased expression of one or more of the dnaA operon proteins had detrimental effects on the cell, except in the case of RecF expression. A shorter C period was not observed with increased expression of the β clamp; in fact, many chromosomes did not complete replication in runout experiments. Increased expression of DnaA alone resulted in stalled replication forks, filamentation, and a decrease in viability. When the three proteins of the dnaA operon were simultaneously overexpressed, highly filamentous cells were observed (>50 μm) with extremely low viability and, in runout experiments, most chromosomes had not completed replication. The possibility that recombinational repair was responsible for the survival of cells overexpressing DnaA was tested by using mutants in different recombinational repair pathways. The absence of RecA, RecB, RecC, or the proteins in the RuvABC complex caused an additional ∼100-fold drop in viability in cells with increased levels of DnaA, indicating a requirement for recombinational repair in these cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document