Italo Svevo and Charlie Chaplin: Dramatic Irony and the Psychoanalytic Stance

2006 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-200
Author(s):  
Robert A. Rushing
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. R. Ridderinkhof ◽  
N. C. Van Wouwe ◽  
G. P. Band ◽  
I. Van De Vijver ◽  
W. P. Van Den Wildenberg ◽  
...  

POETICA ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 25 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 195-219
Author(s):  
Hans Sanders
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Lawrence M. Zbikowski

This chapter explores the relationship between music and physical gesture, drawing on recent research on the spontaneous gestures that accompany speech. Such gestures appear to be motivated by thought processes that are independent from speech and that in many cases offer analogs for dynamic processes. The chapter outlines the infrastructure for human communication that supports language and gesture as well as music. This outline provides a framework for exploring how music and gesture are similar and for how they are different. These comparisons are made through analyses of the movements Fred Astaire makes while accompanying himself at the piano in the 1936 film Swing Time and those Charlie Chaplin makes to Brahms’s Hungarian Dance No. 5 in the 1941 film The Great Dictator. These analyses further explicate the role of syntactic processes and syntactic layers in musical grammar and introduce referential frameworks, which serve as perceptual anchors for syntactic processes.


Author(s):  
Cleo Hanaway-Oakley

This chapter presents an alternative to the popular critical vein that sees Joyce’s Ulysses and early cinema as conveying a mechanical, impersonal view of the world. It is argued that Ulysses and certain genres of early cinema were engaged—naively or otherwise—in a revaluation of Cartesian dualism, involving the reappraisal of mind/body and human/machine binaries. The physical comedy of Bloom and Charlie Chaplin is analysed with reference to phenomenological ideas on prosthesis and the machine–human interface, while other genres of early cinema, such as Irish melodrama and trick films, are considered in the light of phenomenological theories of gesture and embodiment. By comically mocking mind/body separation and depicting the inseparability of subjectivity and corporeality, Joyce and the early film-makers go beyond the ideas of Bergson and anticipate Merleau-Ponty’s later notion of the ‘body-subject’.


Italica ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Giuliana Minghelli ◽  
Mauro Buccheri ◽  
Elio Costa
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-369
Author(s):  
Stephen Bottomore
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 495-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN SBARDELLATI ◽  
TONY SHAW

This article examines the battle over popular culture in the age of McCarthyism. The Federal Bureau of Investigation, under J. Edgar Hoover, targeted Charlie Chaplin because of his status as a cultural icon and as part of its broader investigation of Hollywood. Some of Chaplin's films were considered ““communist propaganda,”” but because Chaplin was not a member of the Communist Party, he was not among those investigated by HUAC in 1947. Nevertheless, he was vulnerable to protests by the American Legion and other patriotic groups because of both his sexual and political unorthodoxy. Yet, although countersubversives succeeded in driving Chaplin out of the country, they failed to build a consensus that Chaplin was a threat to the nation. Chaplin's story testifies to both the awesome power of the countersubversive campaign at mid-century and to some of its limitations as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document