scholarly journals Truncating APC mutations have dominant effects on proliferation, spindle checkpoint control, survival and chromosome stability

2004 ◽  
Vol 117 (26) ◽  
pp. 6339-6353 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Tighe
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Chromosome Stability ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Apc Mutations ◽  
Control Survival

scholarly journals DNA Replication Checkpoint Control Mediated by the Spindle Checkpoint Protein Mad2p in Fission Yeast

2004 ◽  
Vol 279 (45) ◽  
pp. 47372-47378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izumi Sugimoto ◽  
Hiroshi Murakami ◽  
Yuko Tonami ◽  
Akihiko Moriyama ◽  
Makoto Nakanishi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Protein ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint

Components of the human spindle checkpoint control mechanism localize specifically to the active centromere on dicentric chromosomes

2000 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 376-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Saffery ◽  
Danielle Irvine ◽  
Belinda Griffiths ◽  
Paul Kalitsis ◽  
K. Choo
Keyword(s):  
Control Mechanism ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Dicentric Chromosomes ◽  
Active Centromere

scholarly journals Human Papillomavirus Oncoproteins E6 and E7 Independently Abrogate the Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint

1998 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 1131-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer T. Thomas ◽  
Laimonis A. Laimins
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Human Keratinocytes ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
E6 And E7

ABSTRACT The E6 and E7 genes of the high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types encode oncoproteins, and both act by interfering with the activity of cellular tumor suppressor proteins. E7 proteins act by associating with members of the retinoblastoma family, while E6 increases the turnover of p53. p53 has been implicated as a regulator of both the G1/S cell cycle checkpoint and the mitotic spindle checkpoint. When fibroblasts from p53 knockout mice are treated with the spindle inhibitor nocodazole, a rereplication of DNA occurs without transit through mitosis. We investigated whether E6 or E7 could induce a similar loss of mitotic checkpoint activity in human keratinocytes. Recombinant retroviruses expressing high-risk E6 alone, E7 alone, and E6 in combination with E7 were used to infect normal human foreskin keratinocytes (HFKs). Established cell lines were treated with nocodazole, stained with propidium iodide, and analyzed for DNA content by flow cytometry. Cells infected with high-risk E6 were found to continue to replicate DNA and accumulated an octaploid (8N) population. Surprisingly, expression of E7 alone was also able to bypass this checkpoint. Cells expressing E7 alone exhibited increased levels of p53, while those expressing E6 had significantly reduced levels. The p53 present in the E7 cells was active, as increased levels of p21 were observed. This suggested that E7 bypassed the mitotic checkpoint by a p53-independent mechanism. The levels of MDM2, a cellular oncoprotein also implicated in control of the mitotic checkpoint, were significantly elevated in the E7 cells compared to the normal HFKs. In E6-expressing cells, the levels of MDM2 were undetectable. It is possible that abrogation of Rb function by E7 or increased expression of MDM2 contributes to the loss of mitotic spindle checkpoint control in the E7 cells. These findings suggest mechanisms by which both HPV oncoproteins contribute to genomic instability at the mitotic checkpoint.

scholarly journals The APC/C recruits cyclin B1–Cdk1–Cks in prometaphase before D box recognition to control mitotic exit

2010 ◽  
Vol 190 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter van Zon ◽  
Janneke Ogink ◽  
Bas ter Riet ◽  
René H. Medema ◽  
Hein te Riele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
Cyclin B1 ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
N Terminus ◽  
Mitotic Phosphorylation

The ubiquitin ligase anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is activated at prometaphase by mitotic phosphorylation and binding of its activator, Cdc20. This initiates cyclin A degradation, whereas cyclin B1 is stabilized by the spindle checkpoint. Upon checkpoint release, the RXXL destruction box (D box) was proposed to direct cyclin B1 to core APC/C or Cdc20. In this study, we report that endogenous cyclin B1–Cdk1 is recruited to checkpoint-inhibited, phosphorylated APC/C in prometaphase independently of Cdc20 or the cyclin B1 D box. Like cyclin A, cyclin B1 binds the APC/C by the Cdk cofactor Cks and the APC3 subunit. Prior binding to APC/CCdc20 makes cyclin B1 a better APC/C substrate in metaphase, driving mitotic exit and cytokinesis. We conclude that in prometaphase, the phosphorylated APC/C can recruit both cyclin A and cyclin B1 in a Cks-dependent manner. This suggests that the spindle checkpoint blocks D box recognition of APC/C-bound cyclin B1, whereas distinctive complexes between the N terminus of cyclin A and Cdc20 evade checkpoint control.

How oocytes try to get it right: spindle checkpoint control in meiosis

Chromosoma ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra A. Touati ◽  
Katja Wassmann
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Control

scholarly journals Functional Redundancy in the Maize Meiotic Kinetochore

2000 ◽  
Vol 151 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Guo Yu ◽  
R. Kelly Dawe
Keyword(s):  
Light Microscopy ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Functional Redundancy ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Sister Kinetochore ◽  
Meiosis I

Kinetochores can be thought of as having three major functions in chromosome segregation: (a) moving plateward at prometaphase; (b) participating in spindle checkpoint control; and (c) moving poleward at anaphase. Normally, kinetochores cooperate with opposed sister kinetochores (mitosis, meiosis II) or paired homologous kinetochores (meiosis I) to carry out these functions. Here we exploit three- and four-dimensional light microscopy and the maize meiotic mutant absence of first division 1 (afd1) to investigate the properties of single kinetochores. As an outcome of premature sister kinetochore separation in afd1 meiocytes, all of the chromosomes at meiosis II carry single kinetochores. Approximately 60% of the single kinetochore chromosomes align at the spindle equator during prometaphase/metaphase II, whereas acentric fragments, also generated by afd1, fail to align at the equator. Immunocytochemistry suggests that the plateward movement occurs in part because the single kinetochores separate into half kinetochore units. Single kinetochores stain positive for spindle checkpoint proteins during prometaphase, but lose their staining as tension is applied to the half kinetochores. At anaphase, ∼6% of the kinetochores develop stable interactions with microtubules (kinetochore fibers) from both spindle poles. Our data indicate that maize meiotic kinetochores are plastic, redundant structures that can carry out each of their major functions in duplicate.

scholarly journals The Chromosomal Passenger Complex Controls Spindle Checkpoint Function Independent from Its Role in Correcting Microtubule–Kinetochore Interactions

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 4553-4564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerben Vader ◽  
Carin W.A. Cruijsen ◽  
Tanja van Harn ◽  
Martijn J.M. Vromans ◽  
René H. Medema ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Mitotic Arrest ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger Complex ◽  
Coiled Coil Domain ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger

The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) is a critical regulator of chromosome segregation during mitosis by correcting nonbipolar microtubule-kinetochore interactions. By severing these interactions, the CPC is thought to create unattached kinetochores that are subsequently sensed by the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) to prevent premature mitotic exit. We now show that spindle checkpoint function of the CPC and its role in eliminating nonbipolar attachments can be uncoupled. Replacing the chromosomal passenger protein INCENP with a mutant allele that lacks its coiled-coil domain results in an overt defect in a SAC-mediated mitotic arrest in response to taxol treatment, indicating that this domain is critical for CPC function in spindle checkpoint control. Surprisingly, this mutant could restore alignment and cytokinesis during unperturbed cell divisions and was capable of resolving syntelic attachments. Also, Aurora-B kinase was localized and activated normally on centromeres in these cells, ruling out a role for the coiled-coil domain in general Aurora-B activation. Thus, mere microtubule destabilization of nonbipolar attachments by the CPC is insufficient to install a checkpoint-dependent mitotic arrest, and additional, microtubule destabilization–independent CPC signaling toward the spindle assembly checkpoint is required for this arrest, potentially through amplification of the unattached kinetochore-derived checkpoint signal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document