scholarly journals DNA Replication Checkpoint Control Mediated by the Spindle Checkpoint Protein Mad2p in Fission Yeast

2004 ◽  
Vol 279 (45) ◽  
pp. 47372-47378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izumi Sugimoto ◽  
Hiroshi Murakami ◽  
Yuko Tonami ◽  
Akihiko Moriyama ◽  
Makoto Nakanishi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Protein ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint

Overlapping Roles of the Spindle Assembly and DNA Damage Checkpoints in the Cell-Cycle Response to Altered Chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 161 (2) ◽  
pp. 521-534
Author(s):  
Peter M Garber ◽  
Jasper Rine
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Proteins ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoints ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Mcm Proteins ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

Abstract The MAD2-dependent spindle checkpoint blocks anaphase until all chromosomes have achieved successful bipolar attachment to the mitotic spindle. The DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints block anaphase in response to DNA lesions that may include single-stranded DNA and stalled replication forks. Many of the same conditions that activate the DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoints also activated the spindle checkpoint. The mad2Δ mutation partially relieved the arrest responses of cells to mutations affecting the replication proteins Mcm3p and Pol1p. Thus a previously unrecognized aspect of spindle checkpoint function may be to protect cells from defects in DNA replication. Furthermore, in cells lacking either the DNA damage or the DNA replication checkpoints, the spindle checkpoint contributed to the arrest responses of cells to the DNA-damaging agent methyl methanesulfonate, the replication inhibitor hydroxyurea, and mutations affecting Mcm2p and Orc2p. Thus the spindle checkpoint was sensitive to a wider range of chromosomal perturbations than previously recognized. Finally, the DNA replication checkpoint did not contribute to the arrests of cells in response to mutations affecting ORC, Mcm proteins, or DNA polymerase δ. Thus the specificity of this checkpoint may be more limited than previously recognized.

Cdc18p can block mitosis by two independent mechanisms

1998 ◽  
Vol 111 (20) ◽  
pp. 3101-3108 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Greenwood ◽  
H. Nishitani ◽  
P. Nurse
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Kinase ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
N Terminus ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Genes

The DNA replication checkpoint is required to maintain the integrity of the genome, inhibiting mitosis until S phase has been successfully completed. The checkpoint preventing premature mitosis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe relies on phosphorylation of the tyrosine-15 residue on cdc2p to prevent its activation and hence mitosis. The cdc18 gene is essential for both generating the DNA replication checkpoint and the initiation of S phase, thus providing a key role for the overall control and coordination of the cell cycle. We show that the C terminus of the protein is capable of both initiating DNA replication and the checkpoint function of cdc18p. The C terminus of cdc18p acts upstream of the DNA replication checkpoint genes rad1, rad3, rad9, rad17, hus1 and cut5 and requires the wee1p/mik1p tyrosine kinases to block mitosis. The N terminus of cdc18p can also block mitosis but does so in the absence of the DNA replication checkpoint genes and the wee1p/mik1p kinases therefore acting downstream of these genes. Because the N terminus of cdc18p associates with cdc2p in vivo, we suggest that by binding the cdc2p/cdc13p mitotic kinase directly, it exerts an effect independently of the normal checkpoint control, probably in an unphysiological manner.

scholarly journals The DNA damage and the DNA replication checkpoints converge at the MBF transcription factor

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (21) ◽  
pp. 3350-3357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsvetomira Ivanova ◽  
Isabel Alves-Rodrigues ◽  
Blanca Gómez-Escoda ◽  
Chaitali Dutta ◽  
James A. DeCaprio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Damaging Agents ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Transcriptional Complex ◽  
Carboxy Terminal ◽  
Cycle Regulation

In fission yeast cells, Cds1 is the effector kinase of the DNA replication checkpoint. We previously showed that when the DNA replication checkpoint is activated, the repressor Yox1 is phosphorylated and inactivated by Cds1, resulting in activation of MluI-binding factor (MBF)–dependent transcription. This is essential to reinitiate DNA synthesis and for correct G1-to-S transition. Here we show that Cdc10, which is an essential part of the MBF core, is the target of the DNA damage checkpoint. When fission yeast cells are treated with DNA-damaging agents, Chk1 is activated and phosphorylates Cdc10 at its carboxy-terminal domain. This modification is responsible for the repression of MBF-dependent transcription through induced release of MBF from chromatin. This inactivation of MBF is important for survival of cells challenged with DNA-damaging agents. Thus Yox1 and Cdc10 couple normal cell cycle regulation in unperturbed conditions and the DNA replication and DNA damage checkpoints into a single transcriptional complex.

scholarly journals DNA replication checkpoint control of Wee1 stability by vertebrate Hsl7

2004 ◽  
Vol 167 (5) ◽  
pp. 841-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayumi Yamada ◽  
Brad Duffy ◽  
Jennifer A. Perry ◽  
Sally Kornbluth
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Synthetic Lethal ◽  
Mitotic Entry ◽  
Regulatory Module ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Control Modules

G2/M checkpoints prevent mitotic entry upon DNA damage or replication inhibition by targeting the Cdc2 regulators Cdc25 and Wee1. Although Wee1 protein stability is regulated by DNA-responsive checkpoints, the vertebrate pathways controlling Wee1 degradation have not been elucidated. In budding yeast, stability of the Wee1 homologue, Swe1, is controlled by a regulatory module consisting of the proteins Hsl1 and Hsl7 (histone synthetic lethal 1 and 7), which are targeted by the morphogenesis checkpoint to prevent Swe1 degradation when budding is inhibited. We report here the identification of Xenopus Hsl7 as a positive regulator of mitosis that is controlled, instead, by an entirely distinct checkpoint, the DNA replication checkpoint. Although inhibiting Hsl7 delayed mitosis, Hsl7 overexpression overrode the replication checkpoint, accelerating Wee1 destruction. Replication checkpoint activation disrupted Hsl7–Wee1 interactions, but binding was restored by active polo-like kinase. These data establish Hsl7 as a component of the replication checkpoint and reveal that similar cell cycle control modules can be co-opted for use by distinct checkpoints in different organsims.

Caffeine can override the S-M checkpoint in fission yeast

1999 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 927-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.W. Wang ◽  
C. Norbury ◽  
A.L. Harris ◽  
T. Toda
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Restrictive Temperature ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Animal Cells ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Phase Arrest ◽  
S Phase Arrest

The replication checkpoint (or ‘S-M checkpoint’) control prevents progression into mitosis when DNA replication is incomplete. Caffeine has been known for some time to have the capacity to override the S-M checkpoint in animal cells. We show here that caffeine also disrupts the S-M checkpoint in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. By contrast, no comparable effects of caffeine on the S. pombe DNA damage checkpoint were seen. S. pombe cells arrested in early S phase and then exposed to caffeine lost viability rapidly as they attempted to enter mitosis, which was accompanied by tyrosine dephosphorylation of Cdc2. Despite this, the caffeine-induced loss of viability was not blocked in a temperature-sensitive cdc2 mutant incubated at the restrictive temperature, although catastrophic mitosis was prevented under these conditions. This suggests that, in addition to S-M checkpoint control, a caffeine-sensitive function may be important for maintenance of cell viability during S phase arrest. The lethality of a combination of caffeine with the DNA replication inhibitor hydroxyurea was suppressed by overexpression of Cds1 or Chk1, protein kinases previously implicated in S-M checkpoint control and recovery from S phase arrest. In addition, the same combination of drugs was specifically tolerated in cells overexpressing either of two novel S. pombe genes isolated in a cDNA library screen. These findings should allow further molecular investigation of the regulation of S phase arrest, and may provide a useful system with which to identify novel drugs that specifically abrogate the checkpoint control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document