scholarly journals Functional Redundancy in the Maize Meiotic Kinetochore

2000 ◽  
Vol 151 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Guo Yu ◽  
R. Kelly Dawe
Keyword(s):  
Light Microscopy ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Functional Redundancy ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Sister Kinetochore ◽  
Meiosis I

Kinetochores can be thought of as having three major functions in chromosome segregation: (a) moving plateward at prometaphase; (b) participating in spindle checkpoint control; and (c) moving poleward at anaphase. Normally, kinetochores cooperate with opposed sister kinetochores (mitosis, meiosis II) or paired homologous kinetochores (meiosis I) to carry out these functions. Here we exploit three- and four-dimensional light microscopy and the maize meiotic mutant absence of first division 1 (afd1) to investigate the properties of single kinetochores. As an outcome of premature sister kinetochore separation in afd1 meiocytes, all of the chromosomes at meiosis II carry single kinetochores. Approximately 60% of the single kinetochore chromosomes align at the spindle equator during prometaphase/metaphase II, whereas acentric fragments, also generated by afd1, fail to align at the equator. Immunocytochemistry suggests that the plateward movement occurs in part because the single kinetochores separate into half kinetochore units. Single kinetochores stain positive for spindle checkpoint proteins during prometaphase, but lose their staining as tension is applied to the half kinetochores. At anaphase, ∼6% of the kinetochores develop stable interactions with microtubules (kinetochore fibers) from both spindle poles. Our data indicate that maize meiotic kinetochores are plastic, redundant structures that can carry out each of their major functions in duplicate.

scholarly journals Distinct Chromosome Segregation Roles for Spindle Checkpoint Proteins

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 3029-3041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl D. Warren ◽  
D. Michelle Brady ◽  
Raymond C. Johnston ◽  
Joseph S. Hanna ◽  
Kevin G. Hardwick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Chromosome Instability ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Effect Analysis ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Chromosome Transmission ◽  
Acid Fragment ◽  
Molecular Functions

The spindle checkpoint plays a central role in the fidelity of chromosome transmission by ensuring that anaphase is initiated only after kinetochore-microtubule associations of all sister chromatid pairs are complete. In this study, we find that known spindle checkpoint proteins do not contribute equally to chromosome segregation fidelity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Loss of Bub1 or Bub3 protein elicits the largest effect. Analysis of Bub1p reveals the presence of two molecular functions. An N-terminal 608-amino acid (nonkinase) portion of the protein supports robust checkpoint activity, and, as expected, contributes to chromosome segregation. A C-terminal kinase-encoding segment independently contributes to chromosome segregation through an unknown mechanism. Both molecular functions depend on association with Bub3p. A 156-amino acid fragment of Bub1p functions in Bub3p binding and in kinetochore localization by one-hybrid assay. An adjacent segment is required for Mad1p binding, detected by deletion analysis and coimmunoprecipitation. Finally, overexpression of wild-type BUB1 or MAD3 genes leads to chromosome instability. Analysis of this activity indicates that the Bub3p-binding domain of Bub1p contributes to this phenotype through disruption of checkpoint activity as well as through introduction of kinetochore or spindle damage.

scholarly journals Cytoplasmic dynein participates in meiotic checkpoint inactivation in mouse oocytes by transporting cytoplasmic mitotic arrest-deficient (Mad) proteins from kinetochores to spindle poles

Reproduction ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 133 (4) ◽  
pp. 685-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Zhang ◽  
Shen Yin ◽  
Man-Xi Jiang ◽  
Wei Ma ◽  
Yi Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Germinal Vesicle ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Mitotic Arrest ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Meiotic Progression ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Oocyte Meiosis ◽  
And Function

The present study was designed to investigate the localization and function of cytoplasmic dynein (dynein) during mouse oocyte meiosis and its relationship with two major spindle checkpoint proteins, mitotic arrest-deficient (Mad) 1 and Mad2. Oocytes at various stages during the first meiosis were fixed and immunostained for dynein, Mad1, Mad2, kinetochores, microtubules, and chromosomes. Some oocytes were treated with nocodazole before examination. Anti-dynein antibody was injected into the oocytes at germinal vesicle (GV) stage before the examination of its effects on meiotic progression or Mad1 and Mad2 localization. Results showed that dynein was present in the oocytes at various stages from GV to metaphase II and the locations of Mad1 and Mad2 were associated with dynein’s movement. Both Mad1 and Mad2 had two existing states: one existed in the cytoplasm (cytoplasmic Mad1 or cytoplasmic Mad2), which did not bind to kinetochores, while the other bound to kinetochores (kinetochore Mad1 or kinetochore Mad2). The equilibrium between the two states varied during meiosis and/or in response to the changes of the connection between microtubules and kinetochores. Cytoplasmic Mad1 and Mad2 recruited to chromosomes when the connection between microtubules and chromosomes was destroyed. Inhibition of dynein interferes with cytoplasmic Mad1 and Mad2 transportation from chromosomes to spindle poles, thus inhibits checkpoint silence and delays anaphase onset. These results indicate that dynein may play a role in spindle checkpoint inactivation.

scholarly journals The spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 regulates APC/C activity during prometaphase and metaphase of meiosis I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 2848-2861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dai Tsuchiya ◽  
Claire Gonzalez ◽  
Soni Lacefield
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Meiotic Division ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Meiotic Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Protein ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Meiosis I

In many eukaryotes, disruption of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 results in an increase in meiosis I nondisjunction, suggesting that Mad2 has a conserved role in ensuring faithful chromosome segregation in meiosis. To characterize the meiotic function of Mad2, we analyzed individual budding yeast cells undergoing meiosis. We find that Mad2 sets the duration of meiosis I by regulating the activity of APCCdc20. In the absence of Mad2, most cells undergo both meiotic divisions, but securin, a substrate of the APC/C, is degraded prematurely, and prometaphase I/metaphase I is accelerated. Some mad2Δ cells have a misregulation of meiotic cell cycle events and undergo a single aberrant division in which sister chromatids separate. In these cells, both APCCdc20 and APCAma1 are prematurely active, and meiosis I and meiosis II events occur in a single meiotic division. We show that Mad2 indirectly regulates APCAma1 activity by decreasing APCCdc20 activity. We propose that Mad2 is an important meiotic cell cycle regulator that ensures the timely degradation of APC/C substrates and the proper orchestration of the meiotic divisions.

scholarly journals Cohesins Determine the Attachment Manner of Kinetochores to Spindle Microtubules at Meiosis I in Fission Yeast

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 3965-3973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shihori Yokobayashi ◽  
Masayuki Yamamoto ◽  
Yoshinori Watanabe
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Specific Requirement ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Yeast Meiosis ◽  
Meiosis I ◽  
Random Division

ABSTRACT During mitosis, sister kinetochores attach to microtubules that extend to opposite spindle poles (bipolar attachment) and pull the chromatids apart at anaphase (equational segregation). A multisubunit complex called cohesin, including Rad21/Scc1, plays a crucial role in sister chromatid cohesion and equational segregation at mitosis. Meiosis I differs from mitosis in having a reductional pattern of chromosome segregation, in which sister kinetochores are attached to the same spindle (monopolar attachment). During meiosis, Rad21/Scc1 is largely replaced by its meiotic counterpart, Rec8. If Rec8 is inactivated in fission yeast, meiosis I is shifted from reductional to equational division. However, the reason rec8Δ cells undergo equational rather than random division has not been clarified; therefore, it has been unclear whether equational segregation is due to a loss of cohesin in general or to a loss of a specific requirement for Rec8. We report here that the equational segregation at meiosis I depends on substitutive Rad21, which relocates to the centromeres if Rec8 is absent. Moreover, we demonstrate that even if sufficient amounts of Rad21 are transferred to the centromeres at meiosis I, thereby establishing cohesion at the centromeres, rec8Δ cells never recover monopolar attachment but instead secure bipolar attachment. Thus, Rec8 and Rad21 define monopolar and bipolar attachment, respectively, at meiosis I. We conclude that cohesin is a crucial determinant of the attachment manner of kinetochores to the spindle microtubules at meiosis I in fission yeast.

scholarly journals Shugoshin Promotes Sister Kinetochore Biorientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 1199-1209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan M. Kiburz ◽  
Angelika Amon ◽  
Adele L. Marston
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Minor Role ◽  
Meiotic Cell ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Cell Divisions ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Sister Kinetochore ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Meiosis I

Chromosome segregation must be executed accurately during both mitotic and meiotic cell divisions. Sgo1 plays a key role in ensuring faithful chromosome segregation in at least two ways. During meiosis this protein regulates the removal of cohesins, the proteins that hold sister chromatids together, from chromosomes. During mitosis, Sgo1 is required for sensing the absence of tension caused by sister kinetochores not being attached to microtubules emanating from opposite poles. Here we describe a differential requirement for Sgo1 in the segregation of homologous chromosomes and sister chromatids. Sgo1 plays only a minor role in segregating homologous chromosomes at meiosis I. In contrast, Sgo1 is important to bias sister kinetochores toward biorientation. We suggest that Sgo1 acts at sister kinetochores to promote their biorientation.

scholarly journals Human kinetochores are swivel joints that mediate microtubule attachments

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris A Smith ◽  
Andrew D McAinsh ◽  
Nigel J Burroughs
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Organisational Change ◽  
Mechanical Process ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Sister Kinetochore ◽  
Dynamic Microtubule

Chromosome segregation is a mechanical process that requires assembly of the mitotic spindle – a dynamic microtubule-based force-generating machine. Connections to this spindle are mediated by sister kinetochore pairs, that form dynamic end-on attachments to microtubules emanating from opposite spindle poles. This bi-orientation generates forces that have been reported to stretch the kinetochore itself, which has been suggested to stabilise attachment and silence the spindle checkpoint. We reveal using three dimensional tracking that the outer kinetochore domain can swivel around the inner kinetochore/centromere, which results in large reductions in intra-kinetochore distance (delta) when viewed in lower dimensions. We show that swivel provides a mechanical flexibility that enables kinetochores at the periphery of the spindle to engage microtubules. Swivel reduces as cells approach anaphase, suggesting an organisational change linked to checkpoint satisfaction and/or obligatory changes in kinetochore mechanochemistry may occur before dissolution of sister chromatid cohesion.

scholarly journals Chiasmata and the kinetochore component Dam1 are crucial for elimination of erroneous chromosome attachments and centromere oscillation at meiosis I

Open Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Misuzu Wakiya ◽  
Eriko Nishi ◽  
Shinnosuke Kawai ◽  
Kohei Yamada ◽  
Kazuhiro Katsumata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Oriented Attachment ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Correction Factors ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Potential Link ◽  
Meiosis I

Establishment of proper chromosome attachments to the spindle requires elimination of erroneous attachments, but the mechanism of this process is not fully understood. During meiosis I, sister chromatids attach to the same spindle pole (mono-oriented attachment), whereas homologous chromosomes attach to opposite poles (bi-oriented attachment), resulting in homologous chromosome segregation. Here, we show that chiasmata that link homologous chromosomes and kinetochore component Dam1 are crucial for elimination of erroneous attachments and oscillation of centromeres between the spindle poles at meiosis I in fission yeast. In chiasma-forming cells, Mad2 and Aurora B kinase, which provides time for attachment correction and destabilizes erroneous attachments, respectively, caused elimination of bi-oriented attachments of sister chromatids, whereas in chiasma-lacking cells, they caused elimination of mono-oriented attachments. In chiasma-forming cells, in addition, homologous centromere oscillation was coordinated. Furthermore, Dam1 contributed to attachment elimination in both chiasma-forming and chiasma-lacking cells, and drove centromere oscillation. These results demonstrate that chiasmata alter attachment correction patterns by enabling error correction factors to eliminate bi-oriented attachment of sister chromatids, and suggest that Dam1 induces elimination of erroneous attachments. The coincidental contribution of chiasmata and Dam1 to centromere oscillation also suggests a potential link between centromere oscillation and attachment elimination.

scholarly journals Efficient Chromosome Biorientation and the Tension Checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae both Require Bir1

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (16) ◽  
pp. 4552-4562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasso Makrantoni ◽  
Michael J. R. Stark
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Protein Kinase Activity ◽  
Restrictive Temperature ◽  
Microtubule Depolymerization ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Sister Kinetochore

ABSTRACT Accurate chromosome segregation requires the capture of sister kinetochores by microtubules from opposite spindle poles prior to the initiation of anaphase, a state termed chromosome biorientation. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the conserved protein kinase Ipl1 (Aurora B in metazoans) is critical for ensuring correct chromosomal alignment. Ipl1 associates with its activators Sli15 (INCENP), Nbl1 (Borealin), and Bir1 (Survivin), but while Sli15 clearly functions with Ipl1 to promote chromosome biorientation, the role of Bir1 has been uncertain. Using a temperature-sensitive bir1 mutant (bir1-17), we show that Bir1 is needed to permit efficient chromosome biorientation. However, once established, chromosome biorientation is maintained in bir1-17 cells at the restrictive temperature. Ipl1 is partially delocalized in bir1-17 cells, and its protein kinase activity is markedly reduced under nonpermissive conditions. bir1-17 cells arrest normally in response to microtubule depolymerization but fail to delay anaphase when sister kinetochore tension is reduced. Thus, Bir1 is required for the tension checkpoint. Despite their robust mitotic arrest in response to nocodazole, bir1-17 cells are hypersensitive to microtubule-depolymerizing drugs and show a more severe biorientation defect on recovery from nocodazole treatment. The role of Bir1 therefore may become more critical when spindle formation is delayed.

scholarly journals The Nup107-160 Nucleoporin Complex Is Required for Correct Bipolar Spindle Assembly

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 3806-3818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arturo V. Orjalo ◽  
Alexei Arnaoutov ◽  
Zhouxin Shen ◽  
Yekaterina Boyarchuk ◽  
Samantha G. Zeitlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Sperm Chromatin ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Xenopus Egg ◽  
Xenopus Egg Extracts

The Nup107-160 complex is a critical subunit of the nuclear pore. This complex localizes to kinetochores in mitotic mammalian cells, where its function is unknown. To examine Nup107-160 complex recruitment to kinetochores, we stained human cells with antisera to four complex components. Each antibody stained not only kinetochores but also prometaphase spindle poles and proximal spindle fibers, mirroring the dual prometaphase localization of the spindle checkpoint proteins Mad1, Mad2, Bub3, and Cdc20. Indeed, expanded crescents of the Nup107-160 complex encircled unattached kinetochores, similar to the hyperaccumulation observed of dynamic outer kinetochore checkpoint proteins and motors at unattached kinetochores. In mitotic Xenopus egg extracts, the Nup107-160 complex localized throughout reconstituted spindles. When the Nup107-160 complex was depleted from extracts, the spindle checkpoint remained intact, but spindle assembly was rendered strikingly defective. Microtubule nucleation around sperm centrosomes seemed normal, but the microtubules quickly disassembled, leaving largely unattached sperm chromatin. Notably, Ran-GTP caused normal assembly of microtubule asters in depleted extracts, indicating that this defect was upstream of Ran or independent of it. We conclude that the Nup107-160 complex is dynamic in mitosis and that it promotes spindle assembly in a manner that is distinct from its functions at interphase nuclear pores.

scholarly journals Bipolar spindle attachments affect redistributions of ZW10, a Drosophila centromere/kinetochore component required for accurate chromosome segregation.

1996 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
pp. 1127-1140 ◽  
Author(s):  
B C Williams ◽  
M Gatti ◽  
M L Goldberg
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Male Meiosis ◽  
Chromosome Behavior ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Chromosome Missegregation ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromosome Separation ◽  
Meiosis I

Previous efforts have shown that mutations in the Drosophila ZW10 gene cause massive chromosome missegregation during mitotic divisions in several tissues. Here we demonstrate that mutations in ZW10 also disrupt chromosome behavior in male meiosis I and meiosis II, indicating that ZW10 function is common to both equational and reductional divisions. Divisions are apparently normal before anaphase onset, but ZW10 mutants exhibit lagging chromosomes and irregular chromosome segregation at anaphase. Chromosome missegregation during meiosis I of these mutants is not caused by precocious separation of sister chromatids, but rather the nondisjunction of homologs. ZW10 is first visible during prometaphase, where it localizes to the kinetochores of the bivalent chromosomes (during meiosis I) or to the sister kinetochores of dyads (during meiosis II). During metaphase of both divisions, ZW10 appears to move from the kinetochores and to spread toward the poles along what appear to be kinetochore microtubules. Redistributions of ZW10 at metaphase require bipolar attachments of individual chromosomes or paired bivalents to the spindle. At the onset of anaphase I or anaphase II, ZW10 rapidly relocalizes to the kinetochore regions of the separating chromosomes. In other mutant backgrounds in which chromosomes lag during anaphase, the presence or absence of ZW10 at a particular kinetochore predicts whether or not the chromosome moves appropriately to the spindle poles. We propose that ZW10 acts as part of, or immediately downstream of, a tension-sensing mechanism that regulates chromosome separation or movement at anaphase onset.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document