Beyond conventional capacity design: Towards a new design philosophy

2010 ◽  
pp. 213-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Anastasopoulos
Author(s):  
T. Paulay

Indiscriminate application of the capacity design philosophy can lead to unnecessary or indeed absurd conservatism in the earthquake resistant design of gravity load dominated ductile reinforced concrete frames. Low-rise framed buildings are typical examples. The origin of excessive potential strength with respect to lateral loading is discussed and proposals are made to establish an acceptable upper bound for lateral load carrying capacity in such frames. A technique is presented by which the successive formation of potential plastic hinges, involving partial beam sway mechanisms, can be conveniently assured. While retaining the requirements for energy dissipation in beams, it is postulated that at an acceptable high level of lateral loading the formation of storey mechanisms, necessary to complete the frame sway mechanism, should be tolerable. Examples are given to illustrate the determination of design quantities for bending moments, shear and axial forces for both, beams and columns.


2014 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-63
Author(s):  
Akihiro Teguri ◽  
Shunsuke Kawachi ◽  
Jumpei Baba ◽  
Eisuke Shimoda ◽  
Takayuki Sugimoto

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 357-362
Author(s):  
Yudong MAO ◽  
Jianzhong LI

1976 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
B.J. Leather
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Christopher Rhys Watkins ◽  
Colin M. Gray ◽  
Austin L. Toombs ◽  
Paul Parsons
Keyword(s):  

CivilEng ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 442-458
Author(s):  
Sandip Chhetri ◽  
Rachel A. Chicchi

Experimental testing of deformed rebar anchors (DRAs) has not been performed extensively, so there is limited test data to understand their failure behavior. This study aims to expand upon these limited tests and understand the behavior of these anchors, when loaded in tension. Analytical benchmark models were created using available test data and a parametric study of deformed rebar anchors was performed. Anchor diameter, spacing, embedment, and number of anchors were varied for a total of 49 concrete breakout simulations. The different failure modes of anchors were predicted analytically, which showed that concrete breakout failure is prominent in the DRA groups. The predicted concrete breakout values were consistent with mean and 5% fractile concrete capacities determined from the ACI concrete capacity design (CCD) method. The 5% fractile factor determined empirically from the simulation results was kc = 26. This value corresponds closely with kc = 24 specified in ACI 318-19 and ACI 349-13 for cast-in place anchors. The analysis results show that the ACI CCD formula can be conservatively used to design DRAs loaded in tension by applying a kc factor no greater than 26.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document