scholarly journals How well do psychiatric trainees interpret electrocardiographs

1996 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 651-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Warner ◽  
Julia A. Gledhill ◽  
Frankie Connell ◽  
John G. Coghlan

The consensus statement by the Royal College of Psychiatrists recommended that patients on high dose antipsychotic medication receive regular electro-cardiographic monitoring to identify prolongation of the QT interval. A survey of trainee psychiatrists in three hospitals investigated the accuracy with which trainees could identify this abnormality and found only 20% could do so.

1996 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 538-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Lowe ◽  
H. Smith ◽  
A. Clark

The Royal College of Psychiatrists' consensus statement suggests that prescribing high dose antipsychotic medication in children and adolescents should rarely be necessary. Our objective was to study the prescribing of antipsychotic medication in a regional adolescent unit during a three-year period. We found that antipsychotic prescribing on this unit is common in psychotic disorders and often high closes are required. This is not in keeping with the recommendations of the consensus statement. Review of clinical practice on other adolescent units is needed, together with a more comprehensive evaluation of the outcome of psychotic disorders in this age group.


1994 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 647-647
Author(s):  
A. Valmana ◽  
M. Potter

Sir: We welcome the recent Consensus Statement on the Use of High Dose Antipsychotic Medication (Thompson, 1994) but would welcome further guidance on the use of high dosages, particularly when polypharmacy is involved.


1998 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 671-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan M. Barber ◽  
Jennifer Connaughton ◽  
Morag Wright

Aims and methodFollowing the publication of the 1994 Consensus Statement on the use of high-dose antipsychotic medication, we identified our high-dose patients and undertook an audit of the recommended physical investigations. The patients were identified by scrutiny of prescription records. Data were collected retrospectively at six-monthly intervals for four audit cycles. Results were fed back to clinicians at the hospital journal club.ResultsThe percentage of patients identified in the high-dose category fell from 35 to 23% over 18 months. Electrocardiograph monitoring of the group increased from 5 to 63%. Other tests showed a similar improvement. A very small number of abnormal results was shown. There were no untoward cardiac events.Clinical implicationsIntroduction of the standards of physical monitoring advised in the Consensus Statement has implications of cost to the NHS to be balanced against risk avoidance for patients. The number of abnormalities detected in our population was low. Changing prescribing behaviour in response to reported abnormal findings proved unexpectedly slow and a new system was required.


1998 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 675-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Milton ◽  
John Lawton ◽  
Mark Smith ◽  
Ann Buckley

Aims and methodThe Royal College of Psychiatrists' Consensus Statement on “The use of high-dose antipsychotic medication’ suggests only fully qualified psychiatrists (MRCPsych) should recommend the prescribing of high-dose antipsychotic treatment. We observed changes in anti-psychotic prescribing in two surveys of psychiatric in-patients conducted eight and 32 months after publication of the Consensus Statement.ResultsOverall mean chlorpromazine equivalent doses of antipsychotic drugs reduced between the surveys. When p.r.n. (as required) prescribing (usually done by junior doctors) is included, mean potential doses and numbers of patients who might receive ‘high-doses' increases substantially, although the reduction between surveys in total mean dose and proportion of patients on high-dose antipsychotic medication is preserved, and the actual use of p.r.n. medication was low (4–5% of p.r.n. prescriptions).Clinical implicationsWe recommend the development of local guidelines for junior staff concerning antipsychotic drug prescribing, regular monitoring of p.r.n. medication by consultants, and pharmacists' involvement in reviews of patients prescribed high-dose antipsychotic medication.


1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 661-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J. Tyson ◽  
Ann M. Mortimer ◽  
Jason A Wheeler

Aims and methodA trust-wide audit of antipsychotic prescription was conducted in order to investigate the prevalence of high-dose treatment in a population with schizophrenia and assess compliance with Royal College of Psychiatrists' guidelines on the use of high doses. Details of antipsychotic medication were recorded and in cases of high-dose treatment compliance with the College's guidelines was assessed.ResultsSixteen out of 361 patients (4%) were receiving high-dose medication. At re-audit this figure fell to four patients (1%). High-dose treatment comprised of a combined depot and oral medication in most cases. There was poor compliance with the College's guidelines.Clinical implicationsThe study stresses the importance of monitoring patients on high-dose antipsychotics, particularly when taken in combination.


1997 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 408-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. L. Newton ◽  
R. Murthy ◽  
J. Qureshi

A retrospective survey was undertaken to evaluate the prescribing practices of medical staff in a District General Hospital in light of the Consensus Statement by the Royal College of Psychiatrists on the use of high dose antipsychotics (1993). Two per cent of 247 patients were prescribed a higher than recommended dose of antipsychotic. None of these cases had been prescribed ‘supra-BNF doses of antipsychotic on a regular basis, but with the addition of ‘as required’ (PRN) medication the recommended dose was exceeded. In only one patient was the high dosage administered. A further analysis of these patients is made.


1997 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 445-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Taylor ◽  
Ian B. Cookson

Standards developed from the Royal College of Psychiatrists' consensus statement on the use of high-dose antipsychotics were audited. The baseline survey and two completed audit cycles are described showing improvement in the monitoring and management of out-patients on higher dose depot antipsychotics. Initially the main problem was poor attendance at hospital appointments. Practice was changed by (a) medical staff becoming more assertive and visiting non-attenders at home; (b) a phlebotomist visiting patients at home. Deinstitutionalisation has relocated many patients with chronic psychoses into the community, but services, including the ancillary services, have sometimes been slow to follow. This audit found that the most effective change was the provision of services to patients in their own home.


1997 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 566-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graeme Yorston ◽  
Alison Pinney

An audit of antipsychotic prescribing was carried out on community and in-patient samples. A novel method of expressing total daily antipsychotic dose as a percentage of the British National Formulary maximum recommended dose was used. Of 226 patients who had been prescribed antipsychotics, 16 (7%) were found to be on high closes. Their medical notes were examined to ascertain whether the Royal College of Psychiatrists guidelines were being followed. Recommendations on ways in which practice could be improved were made and a re-audit was carried out. The number of patients receiving high doses fell to 6 (3%) out of 206.


1997 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 612-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Sillifant ◽  
Jacqueline Muir ◽  
Mary Crabb ◽  
Stephen Read

In the light of recently published Royal College of Psychiatrists' guidelines on the use of high dose antipsychotic medication, electrocardiographic and blood investigations were performed on 11 patients with learning disabilities receiving such treatment. All patients had normal electrocardiograms (ECGs). Four patients had asymptomatic low white cell counts and mild anaemia was detected in three individuals. Three patients were hyponatraemic; liver function tests were essentially normal. Issues around routine monitoring of such patients are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document