scholarly journals Antipsychotic prescribing in light of the consensus statement of the College

1997 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 408-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. L. Newton ◽  
R. Murthy ◽  
J. Qureshi

A retrospective survey was undertaken to evaluate the prescribing practices of medical staff in a District General Hospital in light of the Consensus Statement by the Royal College of Psychiatrists on the use of high dose antipsychotics (1993). Two per cent of 247 patients were prescribed a higher than recommended dose of antipsychotic. None of these cases had been prescribed ‘supra-BNF doses of antipsychotic on a regular basis, but with the addition of ‘as required’ (PRN) medication the recommended dose was exceeded. In only one patient was the high dosage administered. A further analysis of these patients is made.

1986 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 338-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Kingdon ◽  
T. K. Szulecka

The Report of the Social Services Committee of the House of Commons in 1981 (the ‘Short Report’) recommended the establishment of consultant posts without the support of trainee medical staff as part of a strategy to correct the situation where too many doctors occupied training posts for the number of consultant posts available.1 The Royal College of Psychiatrists has endorsed this policy,2 and the withdrawal of approval for training from an increasing number of hospitals around the country is leading rapidly to a situation where a large number of them need to look at alternative arrangements for providing medical cover. We would like to report the establishment and early development of such an arrangement based in a district general hospital.


1996 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 538-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Lowe ◽  
H. Smith ◽  
A. Clark

The Royal College of Psychiatrists' consensus statement suggests that prescribing high dose antipsychotic medication in children and adolescents should rarely be necessary. Our objective was to study the prescribing of antipsychotic medication in a regional adolescent unit during a three-year period. We found that antipsychotic prescribing on this unit is common in psychotic disorders and often high closes are required. This is not in keeping with the recommendations of the consensus statement. Review of clinical practice on other adolescent units is needed, together with a more comprehensive evaluation of the outcome of psychotic disorders in this age group.


1997 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 445-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Taylor ◽  
Ian B. Cookson

Standards developed from the Royal College of Psychiatrists' consensus statement on the use of high-dose antipsychotics were audited. The baseline survey and two completed audit cycles are described showing improvement in the monitoring and management of out-patients on higher dose depot antipsychotics. Initially the main problem was poor attendance at hospital appointments. Practice was changed by (a) medical staff becoming more assertive and visiting non-attenders at home; (b) a phlebotomist visiting patients at home. Deinstitutionalisation has relocated many patients with chronic psychoses into the community, but services, including the ancillary services, have sometimes been slow to follow. This audit found that the most effective change was the provision of services to patients in their own home.


1997 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 566-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graeme Yorston ◽  
Alison Pinney

An audit of antipsychotic prescribing was carried out on community and in-patient samples. A novel method of expressing total daily antipsychotic dose as a percentage of the British National Formulary maximum recommended dose was used. Of 226 patients who had been prescribed antipsychotics, 16 (7%) were found to be on high closes. Their medical notes were examined to ascertain whether the Royal College of Psychiatrists guidelines were being followed. Recommendations on ways in which practice could be improved were made and a re-audit was carried out. The number of patients receiving high doses fell to 6 (3%) out of 206.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Zuberi ◽  
Y Mushtaq ◽  
K Patel ◽  
J Joseph ◽  
R Gurprashad

Abstract Introduction Meticulous operation note documentation is essential for seamless, safe continuity of care in postoperative surgical patients. This study evaluated the standard of emergency operation note documentation at a district general hospital, when compared to the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng) guidelines and assessed the impact of a new operation note proforma. Method A retrospective review of 50 emergency operation notes was conducted between December 2019 and March 2020 and compared to RCSEng guidelines. Initial findings were presented at a local clinical governance meeting and a new electronic operation note was introduced. A further 50 emergency operation notes using the new proforma were analysed between August 2020 and December 2020. Results RCSEng mentions 19 main points that all operation notes must include. A total of 100 operation notes were reviewed and each given a score out of 19. Intervention of the new proforma showed significant improvement to the average score (15.64 vs 17.94; p < 0.0001) when compared to RCSEng guidelines. In particular, there was significant improvement in the documentation of assistants involved in the procedure (58% vs 98%; p < 0.0001), estimated blood loss (2% vs 63%; p < 0.0001) and specific mention whether the operation was emergency or elective (20% vs 86%; p < 0.0001). Conclusions Implementation of the new proforma showed significant improvement in operation note documentation when compared to the RCSEng standard. Therefore, this study emphasises the need for surgeons to familiarise themselves with the current guidelines and highlights the importance of tailoring local operation note proformas to match this national standard closely.


1993 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 511-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. PACKER ◽  
M. A. SHAHEEN

In a retrospective survey of patients with fractures and dislocations attending the Accident department of a District General hospital, comparison was made between patients with fractures and dislocations in the hand and fractures and dislocations of other sites. Patients with hand injuries accounted for 28% of the total patients seen. They were more likely than other fracture patients to be male and between the ages of 10 and 40 years. Almost a quarter of hand injuries attended on Monday. Leisure activities outside the home formed the commonest aetiological factor. Only 66% of patients with hand injuries attended the Accident department within 24 hours of injury. The little finger was the commonest site of injury. This survey emphasizes the differences between hand injuries and injuries of other sites, identifies the risk factors for hand injuries and has implications for the management of hand injuries in a District General Hospital.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document