The Duncan Case

1891 ◽  
Vol 37 (159) ◽  
pp. 562-566

The trial of Duncan for a homicidal assault upon his wife on May 12th, 1891, offers several points of considerable interest. It is necessary, first of all, to give a brief history of his antecedents. Early in 1854, when a lad of 15, he had two falls on his head, the first of which was severe. It occurred at school while wrestling with another boy. They fell on a stone step or flag in front of the school, Duncan coming down on his head in violent contact with the stone, and the other boy upon him. He was taken to a surgeon. He was stunned, suffered from headache for some weeks, and was at home for about two months. It was not long before a marked change in his character was observed. From being a most considerate and thoughtful boy, he became indifferent and careless, although he did well in his studies. His feelings towards his father, of whom he had always been fond, altered. He said it made him nervous to sit in the same room with him. He became unsettled in all his actions, shut himself up from society, and avoided speaking to people whom he met in the street. He had terrible fits of depression, and he suffered much from insomnia. However, he went to Leheigh University, but in the course of some months suddenly returned home. Indeed, his instability of character had become such that he made plans one day only to break them the next. In 1886 he went to Baltimore to prepare for the Johns Hopkins University. It was not long before he escaped and wrote a letter to his mother in the wildest excitement. At the above-mentioned University he failed to pass the examination in mathematics, and again went off without letting anyone know where he had gone. Fear was felt that in one of his fits of despondency he had committed suicide. As a matter of fact he did contemplate it. He however went to England. He shortly, however, recrossed the Atlantic and resumed his studies. He wrote to his mother after making the attempt, that it was useless, for “he could not comprehend what he was studying.” His brother, a professor in Johns Hopkins University, wrote home that it was absolutely necessary for him to suspend all mental work or the consequence would be serious. In the following summer (1887) he was in the country, constantly changing his plans and labouring under alternate attacks of depression and excitement. It is impossible to give the number of instances in which sudden changes occurred. He began to study medicine, but soon threw it up. In 1888 his brother got him a post in an electrical company, but he immediately returned to Baltimore in great excitement. It was at this time that he consented to see Dr. Kempster, who had accidentally met him some time before, and had been struck with his strange aspect. Dr. Kempster's first impression was confirmed, and he warned the parents as to the necessity of placing him under care. He refused to stay with Dr. Kempster, as his friends wished him to do. Not long afterwards we find him in California, where he had been sent by his brother. After running away and returning he ultimately left California in the spring of 1890. About this period he had visual hallucinations. He continued to suffer from insomnia. He sailed to Europe in the autumn of 1890. In December of that year he wrote home that he had proposed to Miss Jaderholm, a Fin at Abo, and asked his parents' consent, which was given. They were married in February, 1891, although he had written to his mother that the engagement was broken off. Why he did so is not clear, but disregard for truth was one of his characteristics after the above-noted change in moral character came over him.

1955 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 69-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Pfeiffer

When the Chairman of Council asked me to read a paper at the Jubilee Meeting of the Classical Association, I felt highly honoured by this kind invitation. Twice before I have enjoyed the privilege of reading papers at General Meetings of the Association during the last war, when I had been most hospitably received in this country and had found a new home at Oxford. I confess I still feel quite at home here, and it gives me enormous pleasure to come over from Munich and to speak to you once more; so I am deeply grateful to you for giving me this opportunity.But I think I owe you at least one word of explanation for the strange title of this lecture. The Chairman of Council said in his letter ‘that although one lecture should be given on the history of the Classical Association, the other papers should look forward rather than backward’. Now, I had been doing some work on a Hellenistic poet myself, especially during the years at Oxford; as far as I am concerned, I have finished with studies in that province of learning.


1970 ◽  
pp. 24-63
Author(s):  
Zev Bar-Lev

This article outlines an approach to lexicon in Arabic linguistics, with special implications for teaching Arabic as a foreign language. Its basic insight is that individual initial consonants have their own meanings. On a theoretical level, this key-consonant system offers a pervasive theoretical insight about the structure of a lexicon, and the nature of lexical acquisition; and on a practical level, it offers a powerful key to learning vocabulary in L2—which in turn may offer the best possible validation of the theoretical claim. It is here related to insights in linguistic theory on the submorpheme (and analogical modeling); in L2 learning, such submorphemes can help make learning of vocabulary easier, and sometimes even make it possible to guess the meanings of new roots in context. An additional implication for the history of Semitic linguistics is also drawn, proposing to bring back into Semitic linguistics a set of insights that had been “banished” from the mainstream with the advent of “scientific” Semitic grammar over a thousand years ago. On the other hand, we will draw a sharp distinction between the proposal and biconsonantal root theory, with which it might be confused on first impression.


2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-189 ◽  

In 1936, two clinical reviews, one by de Morsier, the other by L'Hermitte and de Ajuriaguerra, formulated an approach to visual hallucinations that continues to this day. Breaking with previous traditions, the papers championed visual hallucinations as worthy of study in their own right, de-emphasizing the clinical significance of their visual contents and distancing them from visual illusions. De Morsier described a set of visual hallucinatory syndromes based on the wider neurological and psychiatric context, many of which remain relevant today; however, one-the Charles Bonnet Syndrome-sparked 70 years of controversy over the role of the eye. Here, the history of visual hallucinatory syndromes and the eye dispute is reviewed, together with advances in perceptual neuroscience that question core assumptions of our current approach. From a neurobiological perspective, three syndromes emerge that relate to specific dysfunctions of afferent, cholinergic and serotonergic visual circuitry and promise future therapeutic advances.


2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-216
Author(s):  
Sebastian Latocha

In this article, the author discusses Monika Sznajderman’s reportage Pusty las [The Empty Forest] in the context of Geertz’s blurred genres. The author mainly addresses the condition of a person (a researcher, an anthropologist) who does not explore the Other but is the Other. In Sznajderman’s book, hospitality is a basic category; the researcher studying a difficult heritage — here, the Lemko region — is a guest who must choose either to look at or to ignore the history of his or her hosts. He or she can feel at home or erase all trace of the hosts’ presence. Perhaps in the end, as Maria Stepanova writes, the researcher can “breathe the air of post-memory.” The author treats Sznajderman’s book as an example of anthropological reportage and postulates the emergence of a new genre, on the border between the social sciences and literature.


2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ina-Maria Greverus

The history of the Anthropological Journal of European Cultures is told here as stories of boundary crossings between cultures of Europe and their overseas relationships: from the outset through developments and 'shifting grounds', to the present day. These stories have ranged from the Wall that divided nations to the vision and reality of European Unity. At the same time, the journal has sought to transcend boundaries between disciplines that, especially in Europe, have often remained attached to national and colonial traditions of monographic description of regions and tribes.Ethnography needs transnational and transdisciplinary discourses and comparison, without losing sight of fieldwork in situ and multiple sites, including from the perspective of the Other.'Anthropologising Europe' has been a key concern of the journal, as have the 'shifting grounds' of 'doing ethnography' in the context of globalisation that sediments places and spaces. Separations received much attention: of nations by the wall between capitalism and communism, in gender relations, or through national and regional bordering processes. But there were also the boundary transgressing utopias of a collage of hybrid society as poetic spark, in which the hybrid anthropologist, too, might feel at home in his or her various hermeneutic endeavours.


2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
FILIPPO DE VIVO

Venice has long evoked contrasting images – on the one hand the republican embodiment of Renaissance principles, a rare example of both stability and freedom; on the other, a city of spying and treachery, a government founded on oppression and driven by corruption. Caught between the Scylla and Carybdis of what amounts to a historiographical paradox, historians have found it difficult to escape its reductiveness, taking sides in describing one view as ‘myth’, the other as historical reality. The five books reviewed in this article suggest different but connected ways of sailing out of these straits by emphasizing the utter diversity of the city, the government, and the images they have evoked through the ages. In this interpretation, more than harmony, what is crucial about Venice is the coexistence of the different ‘worlds’ of this early multicultural metropolis. In line with a recent move away from fixed tags and neat developments to an emphasis on diversity in the historiography of early modern Europe, this is a welcome and interesting evolution in the history of Venice, though it is by no means unproblematic, multiculturalism being no easier issue in the Renaissance than in the twenty-first century.


2015 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 147-215
Author(s):  
Irena Maryniakowa

Former lexis of Ciechanowiec and surrounding villagesIntroduction includes: a) the synthetic approach to the history of micro-regions – geographic location, ethnic and confessional composition, Krzysztof Kluk Museum of Agriculture, Krzysztof Kluk – a priest, an eighteenth-century naturalist who was born and settled here; b) a description of the microtoponimy of Ciechanowiec; c) a description of the local dialect; d) a list of place names; e) a dialect dictionary in alphabetical order; f) a list of proverbs and phraseological saings. In the dictionary part there is lexical material no longer used today, or so we hear rarely, usually at home, in the family. Using it is subject to certain factors: age of the caller, the themes of conversation, particular emotional situation or the other. The entries record not only the meaning of the word, but also the diversity of phonetic, inflectional, peculiar grammatical forms. The usual entry articles are examples of the use of the word in context, and often phrases and proverbs. Ранее употребляемая лексика города Цехановец и окрестных деревеньВступительная часть исследования состоит из: а) синтетического подхода к истории микрорайона – географическое положение, этнический и религиозный состав, краткий очерк истории Сельскохозяйственного музея имени священника и биолога Кшиштофа Kлюка, родившегося и работавшего в Цехановце в XVIII столетии; б) описания микротопонимии города Цехановец; в) описания местного говора; г) списка географических названий; д) словаря местного диалекта; е) списка пословиц и фразеологических оборотов. В словарь включены лексемы сегодня уже не употребляемые или употребляемые редко, как правило, дома, в семейном кругу. Примнение этой лексики обусловлено некоторыми факторами: возраст собеседника, тема разговора, особое эмоциональное состояние и др. Словарная статья отражает значение лексемы, разнообразие фонетических и морфологических форм, примеры использования слов в контексте.


Author(s):  
Colby Dickinson

In his somewhat controversial book Remnants of Auschwitz, Agamben makes brief reference to Theodor Adorno’s apparently contradictory remarks on perceptions of death post-Auschwitz, positions that Adorno had taken concerning Nazi genocidal actions that had seemed also to reflect something horribly errant in the history of thought itself. There was within such murderous acts, he had claimed, a particular degradation of death itself, a perpetration of our humanity bound in some way to affect our perception of reason itself. The contradictions regarding Auschwitz that Agamben senses to be latent within Adorno’s remarks involve the intuition ‘on the one hand, of having realized the unconditional triumph of death against life; on the other, of having degraded and debased death. Neither of these charges – perhaps like every charge, which is always a genuinely legal gesture – succeed in exhausting Auschwitz’s offense, in defining its case in point’ (RA 81). And this is the stance that Agamben wishes to hammer home quite emphatically vis-à-vis Adorno’s limitations, ones that, I would only add, seem to linger within Agamben’s own formulations in ways that he has still not come to reckon with entirely: ‘This oscillation’, he affirms, ‘betrays reason’s incapacity to identify the specific crime of Auschwitz with certainty’ (RA 81).


2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kas Saghafi

In several late texts, Derrida meditated on Paul Celan's poem ‘Grosse, Glühende Wölbung’, in which the departure of the world is announced. Delving into the ‘origin’ and ‘history’ of the ‘conception’ of the world, this paper suggests that, for Derrida, the end of the world is determined by and from death—the death of the other. The death of the other marks, each and every time, the absolute end of the world.


2019 ◽  
Vol 188 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-146
Author(s):  
Martin Bohatý ◽  
Dalibor Velebil

Adalbert Wraný (*1836, †1902) was a doctor of medicine, with his primary specialization in pediatric pathology, and was also one of the founders of microscopic and chemical diagnostics. He was interested in natural sciences, chemistry, botany, paleontology and above all mineralogy. He wrote two books, one on the development of mineralogical research in Bohemia (1896), and the other on the history of industrial chemistry in Bohemia (1902). Wraný also assembled several natural science collections. During his lifetime, he gave to the National Museum large collections of rocks, a collection of cut precious stones and his library. He donated a collection of fossils to the Geological Institute of the Czech University (now Charles University). He was an inspector of the mineralogical collection of the National Museum. After his death, he bequeathed to the National Museum his collection of minerals and the rest of the gemstone collection. He donated paintings to the Prague City Museum, and other property to the Klar Institute of the Blind in Prague. The National Museum’s collection currently contains 4 325 samples of minerals, as well as 21 meteorites and several hundred cut precious stones from Wraný’s collection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document