Affective Illness After Stroke

1987 ◽  
Vol 151 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ebrahim ◽  
D. Barer ◽  
F. Nouri

Mood assessments were made after six months of 149 survivors taken from a register of all patients admitted to hospital with acute stroke. Using a General Health Questionnaire score of 12 or more as a criterion of important affective illness, its prevalence was 23%. There was no difference in risk of affective illness between left and right hemisphere strokes. Affective illness was strongly associated with functional ability, with limb weakness and with longer hospital stay in those with good functional recovery. Only 15% of those with high scores were receiving antidepressant drugs. The general practitioner is in the best position to detect psychiatric illness in stroke survivors; the use of mood rating scales such as the GHQ, in conjunction with clinical assessment may improve detection.

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Isaacs ◽  
Nichole McWhorter ◽  
Teri McHale ◽  
Lorrie N. Shiota ◽  
Henry V. Soper

1957 ◽  
Vol 103 (433) ◽  
pp. 758-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Meyer ◽  
H. Gwynne Jones

Various investigations into the effects of brain injury on psychological test performance (Weisenburg and McBride, 1935; Patterson and Zangwill, 1944; Anderson, 1951; McFie and Piercy, 1952; Bauer and Becka, 1954; Milner, 1954) suggest the overall conclusion that patients with left hemisphere lesions are relatively poor at verbal tasks, while those with right-sided lesions do worst at practical tasks, particularly the manipulation of spatial or spatio-temporal relationships. Heilbfun's (1956) study confirmed that verbal deficits result from left-sided lesions but his left and right hemisphere groups produced almost identical scores on spatial tests. In so far as these workers paid attention to the specific sites of the lesions, their findings indicate that the pattern of test performance is a function of the hemisphere in which the lesion occurs rather than of its specific locus.


Aphasiology ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delaina Walker-batson ◽  
Mary M. Barton ◽  
John S. Wendt ◽  
Sharon Reynolds

NeuroImage ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. S136
Author(s):  
M. Staudt ◽  
G. Niemann ◽  
Michael Erb ◽  
Dirk Wildgruber ◽  
I. Kraegeloh-Mann ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 342-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Goodin ◽  
Gemma Lamp ◽  
Rishma Vidyasagar ◽  
David McArdle ◽  
Rüdiger J. Seitz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Norman D. Cook

Speech production in most people is strongly lateralized to the left hemisphere (LH), but language understanding is generally a bilateral activity. At every level of linguistic processing that has been investigated experimentally, the right hemisphere (RH) has been found to make characteristic contributions, from the processing of the affective aspects of intonation, through the appreciation of word connotations, the decoding of the meaning of metaphors and figures of speech, to the understanding of the overall coherency of verbal humour, paragraphs and short stories. If both hemispheres are indeed engaged in linguistic decoding and both processes are required to achieve a normal level of understanding, a central question concerns how the separate language functions on the left and right are integrated. This chapter reviews relevant studies on the hemispheric contributions to language processing and the role of interhemispheric communications in cognition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document