Predicting a high gas production zone in a reservoir with low porosity and low permeability in TBM area

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhang Yanqing ◽  
Wu Qinglong ◽  
Wang Xia ◽  
Chai Qiaoying ◽  
Meng Li
Keyword(s):  
Gas Production ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Production Zone ◽  
Low Porosity

Wettability Alteration to Intermediate Gas-Wetting in Gas-Condensate Reservoirs at High Temperatures

SPE Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (04) ◽  
pp. 397-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mashhad Mousa Fahes ◽  
Abbas Firoozabadi
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Production Rate ◽  
High Temperatures ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Reservoir Rock ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Absolute Permeability ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Gas Well ◽  
Water Blocking

Summary Wettability of two types of sandstone cores, Berea (permeability on the order of 600 md), and a reservoir rock (permeability on the order of 10 md), is altered from liquid-wetting to intermediate gas-wetting at a high temperature of 140C. Previous work on wettability alteration to intermediate gas-wetting has been limited to 90C. In this work, chemicals previously used at 90C for wettability alteration are found to be ineffective at 140C. New chemicals are used which alter wettability at high temperatures. The results show that:wettability could be permanently altered from liquid-wetting to intermediate gas-wetting at high reservoir temperatures,wettability alteration has a substantial effect on increasing liquid mobility at reservoir conditions,wettability alteration results in improved gas productivity, andwettability alteration does not have a measurable effect on the absolute permeability of the rock for some chemicals. We also find the reservoir rock, unlike Berea, is not strongly water-wet in the gas/water/rock system. Introduction A sharp reduction in gas well deliverability is often observed in many low-permeability gas-condensate reservoirs even at very high reservoir pressure. The decrease in well deliverability is attributed to condensate accumulation (Hinchman and Barree 1985; Afidick et al. 1994) and water blocking (Engineer 1985; Cimolai et al. 1983). As the pressure drops below the dewpoint, liquid accumulates around the wellbore in high saturations, reducing gas relative permeability (Barnum et al. 1995; El-Banbi et al. 2000); the result is a decrease in the gas production rate. Several techniques have been used to increase gas well deliverability after the initial decline. Hydraulic fracturing is used to increase absolute permeability (Haimson and Fairhurst 1969). Solvent injection is implemented in order to remove the accumulated liquid (Al-Anazi et al. 2005). Gas deliverability often increases after the reduction of the condensate saturation around the wellbore. In a successful methanol treatment in Hatter's Pond field in Alabama (Al-Anazi et al. 2005), after the initial decline in well deliverability by a factor of three to five owing to condensate blocking, gas deliverability increased by a factor of two after the removal of water and condensate liquids from the near-wellbore region. The increased rates were, however, sustained for a period of 4 months only. The approach is not a permanent solution to the problem, because the condensate bank will form again. On the other hand, when hydraulic fracturing is used by injecting aqueous fluids, the cleanup of water accumulation from the formation after fracturing is essential to obtain an increased productivity. Water is removed in two phases: immiscible displacement by gas, followed by vaporization by the expanding gas flow (Mahadevan and Sharma 2003). Because of the low permeability and the wettability characteristics, it may take a long time to perform the cleanup; in some cases, as little as 10 to 15% of the water load could be recovered (Mahadevan and Sharma 2003; Penny et al. 1983). Even when the problem of water blocking is not significant, the accumulation of condensate around the fracture face when the pressure falls below dewpoint pressure could result in a reduction in the gas production rate (Economides et al. 1989; Sognesand 1991; Baig et al. 2005).

Development of a directional resistivity logging-while-drilling tool using a joint-coil antenna and its geosteering applications

Geophysics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. D165-D171
Author(s):  
Zhong Wang ◽  
Huaping Wang ◽  
Treston Davis ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Suming Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Voltage Response ◽  
Drilling Tool ◽  
Detection Depth ◽  
Logging While Drilling ◽  
Resistivity Logging ◽  
Coil Antenna ◽  
Production Zone ◽  
Distance To The Boundary

Geosteering is a key technique to increase oil- and gas-production rates, especially within a thin reservoir layer. The purpose of geosteering in the production zone is to keep the drilling path in oil- and gas-bearing reservoirs. To keep the drilling system inside the production zone, downhole sensors must be able to detect bed boundaries, which include identifying the boundary location with respect to the sensor and the boundary distance from the sensor. We have developed a directional resistivity logging-while-drilling (LWD) tool for geosteering applications. The directional LWD tool is equipped with a joint-coil antenna composed of an axially polarized coil Rz connected in series with two transversely polarized coils Rx. During a revolution around the axis of the tool, the voltage of the axial coil VRz, voltage of the transverse coils VRx, and tool face angle [Formula: see text], which indicates the boundary direction, can be extracted through curve fitting the total voltage response of the joint-coil antenna. The distance to the boundary can be derived from a 1D inversion. The LWD tool has been tested in several reservoirs in China, and it has a demonstrated capability to provide reliable and accurate estimations of the boundary direction and distance. Field data indicate that the boundary detection depth can reach 2.1 and 1.7 m when the tool is in a sand and shale formation. Using wireline-logging data from surrounding wells as reference, deviations between the reference and the measured distance to the boundary are within 0.2 m.

Formation Damage Issues Impacting the Productivity of Low Permeability, Low Initial Water Saturation Gas Producing Formations

2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Brant Bennion ◽  
F. Brent Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Capillary Pressure ◽  
Water Saturation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Pressure Effects ◽  
Formation Damage ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Gas Reservoirs ◽  
Initial Water ◽  
The Impact

Very low in situ permeability gas reservoirs (Kgas<0.1mD) are very common and represent a major portion of the current exploitation market for unconventional gas production. Many of these reservoirs exist regionally in Canada and the United States and also on a worldwide basis. A considerable fraction of these formations appear to exist in a state of noncapillary equilibrium (abnormally low initial water saturation given the pore geometry and capillary pressure characteristics of the rock). These reservoirs have many unique challenges associated with the drilling and completion practices required in order to obtain economic production rates. Formation damage mechanisms affecting these very low permeability gas reservoirs, with a particular emphasis on relative permeability and capillary pressure effects (phase trapping) will be discussed in this article. Examples of reservoirs prone to these types of problems will be reviewed, and techniques which can be used to minimize the impact of formation damage on the productivity of tight gas reservoirs of this type will be presented.

COAL SEAM DEGASIFICATION IN QUEENSLAND UTILISING HYDRAULIC FRACTURING WITH FOAM—A CASE HISTORY

1981 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
B. Wilkinson ◽  
L. Barro
Keyword(s):  
Gas Flow ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Gas Flow Rate ◽  
Coal Seams ◽  
Flow Rates ◽  
Coal Deposits ◽  
Early Production ◽  
Design Calculations ◽  
Gas Bearing

Vast reserves of gas-bearing coal deposits are located in Queensland. Owing to the extremely low permeability and porosity of the coal, very low gas flow rates are normally encountered. In an effort to enhance the gas production to economic quantities and to degasify the coal to provide a safer mining environment, four experimental wells were drilled into coal seams near Blackwater, Queensland.Based on extensive laboratory testing of coal samples, computerised fracture design calculations were performed to determine a suitable stimulation programme. The wells were hydraulically fractured with up to 15 000 US gal of foamed stimulation fluid containing 75 per cent nitrogen. To prop open the induced fracture system, 15 000 lb of sand was pumped with the foam. The maximum concentration was eight pounds of 20-40 mesh sand per gallon of fluid. Gas production from the unstimulated wells was too low to measure. Early production data soon after the fracturing suggested a gas flow rate of approximately 50 Mcf/D.

Calculation Methods of the Dynamic Reserves for Gas Wells in a Low-Permeability Gas Reservoir

2013 ◽  
Vol 295-298 ◽  
pp. 3243-3248
Author(s):  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Lai Bing Zhang ◽  
Jun Jie Zhang ◽  
Feng Lan ◽  
Pan Deng
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Material Balance ◽  
Production Method ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Phase Method ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Gas Reservoir ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Material Balance Method ◽  
Unit Pressure

Accurately calculating dynamic reserves for single well in a low-permeability gas reservoir has an important guiding significance to high efficiency development of the gas reservoir. During the development of the gas reservoir, dynamic analysis methods were often used to calculate dynamic reserves. Dynamic analysis methods mainly include the material balance method, the gas production method in unit pressure drop, the flexible two-phase method and the production unstable method. Dynamic reserves for four types of gas wells in a low-permeability gas field were calculated using these four methods. Calculation results show that dynamic reserves from big to small are respectively obtained using material balance method, gas production method in unit pressure drop, flexible two-phase method and production unstable method. Calculating dynamic reserves obtained by flexible two-phase method and production unstable method are utilized to production dynamic data of gas well, and those obtained by material balance method and gas production method in unit pressure drop are utilized to the reservoir parameters of different state. Therefore, the values of dynamic reserves obtained using flexible two-phase method and production unstable method in the low-permeability gas reservoir may be more accurate than those obtained using the other methods.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document