scholarly journals Bollène-2002 Experiment: Radar Quantitative Precipitation Estimation in the Cévennes–Vivarais Region, France

2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 1422-1447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Delrieu ◽  
Brice Boudevillain ◽  
John Nicol ◽  
Benoît Chapon ◽  
Pierre-Emmanuel Kirstetter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Processing ◽  
Processing System ◽  
Ground Level ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Time Step ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Mountainous Regions ◽  
Study Results

Abstract The Bollène-2002 Experiment was aimed at developing the use of a radar volume-scanning strategy for conducting radar rainfall estimations in the mountainous regions of France. A developmental radar processing system, called Traitements Régionalisés et Adaptatifs de Données Radar pour l’Hydrologie (Regionalized and Adaptive Radar Data Processing for Hydrological Applications), has been built and several algorithms were specifically produced as part of this project. These algorithms include 1) a clutter identification technique based on the pulse-to-pulse variability of reflectivity Z for noncoherent radar, 2) a coupled procedure for determining a rain partition between convective and widespread rainfall R and the associated normalized vertical profiles of reflectivity, and 3) a method for calculating reflectivity at ground level from reflectivities measured aloft. Several radar processing strategies, including nonadaptive, time-adaptive, and space–time-adaptive variants, have been implemented to assess the performance of these new algorithms. Reference rainfall data were derived from a careful analysis of rain gauge datasets furnished by the Cévennes–Vivarais Mediterranean Hydrometeorological Observatory. The assessment criteria for five intense and long-lasting Mediterranean rain events have proven that good quantitative precipitation estimates can be obtained from radar data alone within 100-km range by using well-sited, well-maintained radar systems and sophisticated, physically based data-processing systems. The basic requirements entail performing accurate electronic calibration and stability verification, determining the radar detection domain, achieving efficient clutter elimination, and capturing the vertical structure(s) of reflectivity for the target event. Radar performance was shown to depend on type of rainfall, with better results obtained with deep convective rain systems (Nash coefficients of roughly 0.90 for point radar–rain gauge comparisons at the event time step), as opposed to shallow convective and frontal rain systems (Nash coefficients in the 0.6–0.8 range). In comparison with time-adaptive strategies, the space–time-adaptive strategy yields a very significant reduction in the radar–rain gauge bias while the level of scatter remains basically unchanged. Because the Z–R relationships have not been optimized in this study, results are attributed to an improved processing of spatial variations in the vertical profile of reflectivity. The two main recommendations for future work consist of adapting the rain separation method for radar network operations and documenting Z–R relationships conditional on rainfall type.

scholarly journals Impact of the Altitudinal Gradients of Precipitation on the Radar QPE Bias in the French Alps

Atmosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Faure ◽  
Guy Delrieu ◽  
Nicolas Gaussiat
Keyword(s):  
Ground Level ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Altitudinal Gradients ◽  
French Alps ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Radar Data Processing

In the French Alps the quality of the radar Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) is limited by the topography and the vertical structure of precipitation. A previous study realized in all the French Alps, has shown a general bias between values of the national radar QPE composite and the rain gauge measurements: a radar QPE over-estimation at low altitude (+20% at 200 m a.s.l.), and an increasing underestimation at high altitudes (until −40% at 2100 m a.s.l.). This trend has been linked to altitudinal gradients of precipitation observed at ground level. This paper analyzes relative altitudinal gradients of precipitation estimated with rain gauges measurements in 2016 for three massifs around Grenoble, and for different temporal accumulations (yearly, seasonal, monthly, daily). Comparisons of radar and rain gauge accumulations confirm the bias previously observed. The parts of the current radar data processing affecting the bias value are pointed out. The analysis shows a coherency between the relative gradient values estimated at the different temporal accumulations. Vertical profiles of precipitation detected by a research radar installed at the bottom of the valley also show how the wide horizontal variability of precipitation inside the valley can affect the gradient estimation.

scholarly journals Time-dependent <i>Z-R</i> relationships for estimating rainfall fields from radar measurements

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Alfieri ◽  
P. Claps ◽  
F. Laio
Keyword(s):  
Time Estimation ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rainfall Rate ◽  
Time Step ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Weather Radars ◽  
The North ◽  
Real Time Estimation ◽  
Power Law Equation

Abstract. The operational use of weather radars has become a widespread and useful tool for estimating rainfall fields. The radar-gauge adjustment is a commonly adopted technique which allows one to reduce bias and dispersion between radar rainfall estimates and the corresponding ground measurements provided by rain gauges. This paper investigates a new methodology for estimating radar-based rainfall fields by recalibrating at each time step the reflectivity-rainfall rate (Z-R) relationship on the basis of ground measurements provided by a rain gauge network. The power-law equation for converting reflectivity measurements into rainfall rates is readjusted at each time step, by calibrating its parameters using hourly Z-R pairs collected in the proximity of the considered time step. Calibration windows with duration between 1 and 24 h are used for estimating the parameters of the Z-R relationship. A case study pertaining to 19 rainfall events occurred in the north-western Italy is considered, in an area located within 25 km from the radar site, with available measurements of rainfall rate at the ground and radar reflectivity aloft. Results obtained with the proposed method are compared to those of three other literature methods. Applications are described for a posteriori evaluation of rainfall fields and for real-time estimation. Results suggest that the use of a calibration window of 2–5 h yields the best performances, with improvements that reach the 28% of the standard error obtained by using the most accurate fixed (climatological) Z-R relationship.

scholarly journals The New French Operational Polarimetric Radar Rainfall Rate Product

2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 1817-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi Figueras i Ventura ◽  
Pierre Tabary
Keyword(s):  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rainfall Rate ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Rain Gauge Data ◽  
Frequency Bands ◽  
Radar Network ◽  
Significant Events ◽  
X Band

AbstractIn 2012 the Météo France metropolitan operational radar network consists of 24 radars operating at C and S bands. In addition, a network of four X-band gap-filler radars is being deployed in the French Alps. The network combines polarimetric and nonpolarimetric radars. Consequently, the operational radar rainfall algorithm has been adapted to process both polarimetric and nonpolarimetric data. The polarimetric processing chain is available in two versions. In the first version, now operational, polarimetry is only used to correct for attenuation and filter out clear-air echoes. In the second version there is a more extensive use of polarimetry. In particular, the specific differential phase Kdp is used to estimate rainfall rate in intense rain. The performance of the three versions of radar rainfall algorithms (conventional, polarimetric V1, and polarimetric V2) at different frequency bands (S, C, and X) is evaluated by processing radar data of significant events offline and comparing hourly radar rainfall accumulations with hourly rain gauge data. The results clearly show a superior performance of the polarimetric products with respect to the nonpolarimetric ones at all frequency bands, but particularly at higher frequency. The second version of the polarimetric product, which makes a broader use of polarimetry, provides the best overall results.

scholarly journals Product-Error-Driven Uncertainty Model for Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Estimation with NEXRAD Data

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1325-1347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grzegorz J. Ciach ◽  
Witold F. Krajewski ◽  
Gabriele Villarini
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Research ◽  
Central Element ◽  
Processing System ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Random Errors ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Uncertainty Model ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
The U.S

Abstract Although it is broadly acknowledged that the radar-rainfall (RR) estimates based on the U.S. national network of Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) stations contain a high degree of uncertainty, no methods currently exist to inform users about its quantitative characteristics. The most comprehensive characterization of this uncertainty can be achieved by delivering the products in a probabilistic rather than the traditional deterministic form. The authors are developing a methodology for probabilistic quantitative precipitation estimation (PQPE) based on weather radar data. In this study, they present the central element of this methodology: an empirically based error structure model for the RR products. The authors apply a product-error-driven (PED) approach to obtain a realistic uncertainty model. It is based on the analyses of six years of data from the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, WSR-88D radar (KTLX) processed with the Precipitation Processing System algorithm of the NEXRAD system. The modeled functional-statistical relationship between RR estimates and corresponding true rainfall consists of two components: a systematic distortion function and a stochastic factor quantifying remaining random errors. The two components are identified using a nonparametric functional estimation apparatus. The true rainfall is approximated with rain gauge data from the Oklahoma Mesonet and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Research Service Micronet networks. The RR uncertainty model presented here accounts for different time scales, synoptic regimes, and distances from the radar. In addition, this study marks the first time in which results on RR error correlation in space and time are presented.

scholarly journals Impact of Gauge Representative Error on a Radar Rainfall Uncertainty Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 2769-2787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Dai ◽  
Qiqi Yang ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Shuliang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Considerable Effect ◽  
Temporal Dependence ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Uncertainty Model ◽  
Uncertainty Band ◽  
Uncertainty Models

AbstractIn modeling the radar rainfall uncertainty, rain gauge measurement is generally regarded as the areal “true” rainfall. However, the inconsistent scales between radar and gauge may introduce a new uncertainty (also known as gauge representative uncertainty), which is erroneously identified as radar rainfall uncertainty and therefore called pseudouncertainty. It is crucial to comprehend what percentage of the estimated radar rainfall uncertainty actually stems from such pseudouncertainty rather than radar rainfall itself. For this reason, based on a fully formulated radar rainfall uncertainty model, this study aims to explore how the gauge representative error affects the distribution, spatial dependence, and temporal dependence of hourly accumulated radar rainfall uncertainty, and consequently affects the produced radar rainfall uncertainty band. Three group scenarios that delineate various degrees of gauge representative errors were designed to configure and run the uncertainty model. In the setting of a long-term analysis (almost 7 years) of the Brue catchment in the United Kingdom, we found that the gauge representative error affected the simulation of the marginal distribution of radar rainfall error, and had a considerable effect on temporal dependence estimation of radar rainfall uncertainty. The spread of the rainfall uncertainty band decreased with the growth of the gauge density in a radar pixel. The scenario with the lowest representative error only had 78% uncertainty spread of the scenario that has the largest error. This indicated there was a large impact of the representative error on radar rainfall uncertainty models. It is hoped that more catchments with diverse climate and geographical conditions and more radar data with various spatial scales could be explored by the research community to further investigate this crucial issue.

scholarly journals Correction of Radar Reflectivity and Differential Reflectivity for Rain Attenuation at X Band. Part II: Evaluation and Application

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1633-1655 ◽  
Author(s):  
S-G. Park ◽  
M. Maki ◽  
K. Iwanami ◽  
V. N. Bringi ◽  
V. Chandrasekar
Keyword(s):  
Drop Size ◽  
Earth Science ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
X Band ◽  
Rain Events ◽  
Differential Reflectivity ◽  
Rainfall Estimates ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract In this paper, the attenuation-correction methodology presented in Part I is applied to radar measurements observed by the multiparameter radar at the X-band wavelength (MP-X) of the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED), and is evaluated by comparison with scattering simulations using ground-based disdrometer data. Further, effects of attenuation on the estimation of rainfall amounts and drop size distribution parameters are also investigated. The joint variability of the corrected reflectivity and differential reflectivity show good agreement with scattering simulations. In addition, specific attenuation and differential attenuation, which are derived in the correction procedure, show good agreement with scattering simulations. In addition, a composite rainfall-rate algorithm is proposed and evaluated by comparison with eight gauges. The radar-rainfall estimates from the uncorrected (or observed) ZH produce severe underestimation, even at short ranges from the radar and for stratiform rain events. On the contrary, the reflectivity-based rainfall estimates from the attenuation-corrected ZH does not show such severe underestimation and does show better agreement with rain gauge measurements. More accurate rainfall amounts can be obtained from a simple composite algorithm based on specific differential phase KDP, with the R(ZH_cor) estimates being used for low rainfall rates (KDP ≤ 0.3° km−1 or ZH_cor ≤ 35 dBZ). This improvement in accuracy of rainfall estimation based on KDP is a result of the insensitivity of the rainfall algorithm to natural variations of drop size distributions (DSDs). The ZH, ZDR, and KDP data are also used to infer the parameters (median volume diameter D0 and normalized intercept parameter Nw) of a normalized gamma DSD. The retrieval of D0 and Nw from the corrected radar data show good agreement with those from disdrometer data in terms of the respective relative frequency histograms. The results of this study demonstrate that high-quality hydrometeorological information on rain events such as rainfall amounts and DSDs can be derived from X-band polarimetric radars.

scholarly journals Facilitating radar precipitation data processing, assessment and analysis: a GIS-compatible python approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 652-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Kreklow
Keyword(s):  
Data Processing ◽  
Data Exchange ◽  
Weather Radar ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Precipitation Data ◽  
Raw Data ◽  
Automated Processing ◽  
Point Data ◽  
Radar Data Processing

Abstract A review of existing tools for radar data processing revealed a lack of open source software for automated processing, assessment and analysis of weather radar composites. The ArcGIS-compatible Python package radproc attempts to reduce this gap. Radproc provides an automated raw data processing workflow for nationwide, freely available German weather radar climatology (RADKLIM) and operational (RADOLAN) composite products. Raw data are converted into a uniform HDF5 file structure used by radproc's analysis and data quality assessment functions. This enables transferability of the developed analysis and export functionality to other gridded or point-scale precipitation data. Thus, radproc can be extended by additional import routines to support any other German or non-German precipitation dataset. Analysis methods include temporal aggregations, detection of heavy rainfall and an automated processing of rain gauge point data into the same HDF5 format for comparison to gridded radar data. A set of functions for data exchange with ArcGIS allows for visualisation and further geospatial analysis. The application on a 17-year time series of hourly RADKLIM data showed that radproc greatly facilitates radar data processing and analysis by avoiding manual programming work and helps to lower the barrier for non-specialists to work with these novel radar climatology datasets.

Laser Radar, Data Processing System and Measurements of Air Pollutions

1977 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 109-116
Author(s):  
Y. Murakami ◽  
Y. Izawa ◽  
Y. Suzuki ◽  
C. Yamanaka ◽  
M. Nishimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Processing ◽  
Processing System ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Laser Radar ◽  
Data Processing System ◽  
Air Pollutions ◽  
Radar Data Processing

scholarly journals The New French Operational Radar Rainfall Product. Part II: Validation

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Tabary ◽  
J. Desplats ◽  
K. Do Khac ◽  
F. Eideliman ◽  
C. Gueguen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Radiosonde Data ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Freezing Level ◽  
Ground Clutter ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Upper Level ◽  
Quality Indexes ◽  
Precipitation Events

Abstract A new operational radar-based rainfall product has been developed at Météo-France and is currently being deployed within the French operational network. The new quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) product is based entirely on radar data and includes a series of modules aimed at correcting for ground clutter, partial beam blocking, and vertical profile of reflectivity (VPR) effects, as well as the nonsimultaneity of radar measurements. The surface rainfall estimation is computed as a weighted mean of the corrected tilts. In addition to the final QPE, a map of quality indexes is systematically generated. This paper is devoted to the validation of the new radar QPE. The VPR identification module has been specifically validated by analyzing 489 precipitation events observed over 1 yr by a representative eight-radar subset of the network. The conceptual model of VPR used in the QPE processing chain is shown to be relevant. A climatology of the three shape parameters of the conceptual VPR (brightband peak, brightband thickness, and upper-level decreasing rate) is established and the radar-derived freezing-level heights are shown to be in good agreement with radiosonde data. A total of 27 precipitation events observed by three S-band radars of the network during the winter of 2005 and the autumns of 2002 and 2003 are used to compare the new radar QPE to the old one. Results are stratified according to the distance to the radar and according to the height of the freezing level. The Nash criterion is increased from 0.23 to 0.62 at close range (below 50 km) and from 0.35 to 0.42 at long range (between 100 and 150 km). The relevance of the proposed quality indexes is assessed by examining their statistical relationship with long-term radar–rain gauge statistics. Mosaics of QPE and quality indexes are also illustrated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document