scholarly journals Correction of Radar Reflectivity and Differential Reflectivity for Rain Attenuation at X Band. Part II: Evaluation and Application

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1633-1655 ◽  
Author(s):  
S-G. Park ◽  
M. Maki ◽  
K. Iwanami ◽  
V. N. Bringi ◽  
V. Chandrasekar
Keyword(s):  
Drop Size ◽  
Earth Science ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
X Band ◽  
Rain Events ◽  
Differential Reflectivity ◽  
Rainfall Estimates ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract In this paper, the attenuation-correction methodology presented in Part I is applied to radar measurements observed by the multiparameter radar at the X-band wavelength (MP-X) of the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED), and is evaluated by comparison with scattering simulations using ground-based disdrometer data. Further, effects of attenuation on the estimation of rainfall amounts and drop size distribution parameters are also investigated. The joint variability of the corrected reflectivity and differential reflectivity show good agreement with scattering simulations. In addition, specific attenuation and differential attenuation, which are derived in the correction procedure, show good agreement with scattering simulations. In addition, a composite rainfall-rate algorithm is proposed and evaluated by comparison with eight gauges. The radar-rainfall estimates from the uncorrected (or observed) ZH produce severe underestimation, even at short ranges from the radar and for stratiform rain events. On the contrary, the reflectivity-based rainfall estimates from the attenuation-corrected ZH does not show such severe underestimation and does show better agreement with rain gauge measurements. More accurate rainfall amounts can be obtained from a simple composite algorithm based on specific differential phase KDP, with the R(ZH_cor) estimates being used for low rainfall rates (KDP ≤ 0.3° km−1 or ZH_cor ≤ 35 dBZ). This improvement in accuracy of rainfall estimation based on KDP is a result of the insensitivity of the rainfall algorithm to natural variations of drop size distributions (DSDs). The ZH, ZDR, and KDP data are also used to infer the parameters (median volume diameter D0 and normalized intercept parameter Nw) of a normalized gamma DSD. The retrieval of D0 and Nw from the corrected radar data show good agreement with those from disdrometer data in terms of the respective relative frequency histograms. The results of this study demonstrate that high-quality hydrometeorological information on rain events such as rainfall amounts and DSDs can be derived from X-band polarimetric radars.

scholarly journals The New French Operational Polarimetric Radar Rainfall Rate Product

2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 1817-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi Figueras i Ventura ◽  
Pierre Tabary
Keyword(s):  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rainfall Rate ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Rain Gauge Data ◽  
Frequency Bands ◽  
Radar Network ◽  
Significant Events ◽  
X Band

AbstractIn 2012 the Météo France metropolitan operational radar network consists of 24 radars operating at C and S bands. In addition, a network of four X-band gap-filler radars is being deployed in the French Alps. The network combines polarimetric and nonpolarimetric radars. Consequently, the operational radar rainfall algorithm has been adapted to process both polarimetric and nonpolarimetric data. The polarimetric processing chain is available in two versions. In the first version, now operational, polarimetry is only used to correct for attenuation and filter out clear-air echoes. In the second version there is a more extensive use of polarimetry. In particular, the specific differential phase Kdp is used to estimate rainfall rate in intense rain. The performance of the three versions of radar rainfall algorithms (conventional, polarimetric V1, and polarimetric V2) at different frequency bands (S, C, and X) is evaluated by processing radar data of significant events offline and comparing hourly radar rainfall accumulations with hourly rain gauge data. The results clearly show a superior performance of the polarimetric products with respect to the nonpolarimetric ones at all frequency bands, but particularly at higher frequency. The second version of the polarimetric product, which makes a broader use of polarimetry, provides the best overall results.

Improving Spatial Rainfall Estimates at Mt. Merapi Area Using Radar-Rain Gauge Conditional Merging

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roby Hambali ◽  
Djoko Legono ◽  
Rachmad Jayadi ◽  
Satoru Oishi ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Resolution ◽  
Early Warning ◽  
Interpolation Method ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Value Distribution ◽  
Rainfall Data ◽  
Warning Systems ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
X Band ◽  
Rainfall Estimates

Rainfall monitoring is important for providing early warning of lahar flow around Mt. Merapi. The X-band multi-parameter radar developed to support these warning systems provides rainfall information with high spatial and temporal resolution. However, this method underestimates the rainfall compared with rain gauge measurements. Herein, we performed conditional radar-rain gauge merging to obtain the optimal rainfall value distribution. By using the cokriging interpolation method, kriged gauge rainfall, and kriged radar rainfall data were obtained, which were then combined with radar rainfall data to yield the adjusted spatial rainfall. Radar-rain gauge conditional merging with cokriging interpolation provided reasonably well-adjusted spatial rainfall pattern.

scholarly journals Assessment of Native Radar Reflectivity and Radar Rainfall Estimates for Discharge Forecasting in Mountain Catchments with a Random Forest Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 1986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Orellana-Alvear ◽  
Rolando Célleri ◽  
Rütger Rollenbeck ◽  
Paul Muñoz ◽  
Pablo Contreras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Random Forest Model ◽  
Mountain Regions ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Forest Model ◽  
Rainfall Estimates

Discharge forecasting is a key component for early warning systems and extremely useful for decision makers. Forecasting models require accurate rainfall estimations of high spatial resolution and other geomorphological characteristics of the catchment, which are rarely available in remote mountain regions such as the Andean highlands. While radar data is available in some mountain areas, the absence of a well distributed rain gauge network makes it hard to obtain accurate rainfall maps. Thus, this study explored a Random Forest model and its ability to leverage native radar data (i.e., reflectivity) by providing a simplified but efficient discharge forecasting model for a representative mountain catchment in the southern Andes of Ecuador. This model was compared with another that used as input derived radar rainfall (i.e., rainfall depth), obtained after the transformation from reflectivity to rainfall rate by using a local Z-R relation and a rain gauge-based bias adjustment. In addition, the influence of a soil moisture proxy was evaluated. Radar and runoff data from April 2015 to June 2017 were used. Results showed that (i) model performance was similar by using either native or derived radar data as inputs (0.66 < NSE < 0.75; 0.72 < KGE < 0.78). Thus, exhaustive pre-processing for obtaining radar rainfall estimates can be avoided for discharge forecasting. (ii) Soil moisture representation as input of the model did not significantly improve model performance (i.e., NSE increased from 0.66 to 0.68). Finally, this native radar data-based model constitutes a promising alternative for discharge forecasting in remote mountain regions where ground monitoring is scarce and hardly available.

scholarly journals Advancing Precipitation Estimation and Streamflow Simulations in Complex Terrain with X-Band Dual-Polarization Radar Observations

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marios Anagnostou ◽  
Efthymios Nikolopoulos ◽  
John Kalogiros ◽  
Emmanouil Anagnostou ◽  
Francesco Marra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complex Terrain ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Storm Events ◽  
Error Statistics ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Radar Observations ◽  
X Band ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Rainfall Estimates

In mountain basins, the use of long-range operational weather radars is often associated with poor quantitative precipitation estimation due to a number of challenges posed by the complexity of terrain. As a result, the applicability of radar-based precipitation estimates for hydrological studies is often limited over areas that are in close proximity to the radar. This study evaluates the advantages of using X-band polarimetric (XPOL) radar as a means to fill the coverage gaps and improve complex terrain precipitation estimation and associated hydrological applications based on a field experiment conducted in an area of Northeast Italian Alps characterized by large elevation differences. The corresponding rainfall estimates from two operational C-band weather radar observations are compared to the XPOL rainfall estimates for a near-range (10–35 km) mountainous basin (64 km2). In situ rainfall observations from a dense rain gauge network and two disdrometers (a 2D-video and a Parsivel) are used for ground validation of the radar-rainfall estimates. Ten storm events over a period of two years are used to explore the differences between the locally deployed XPOL vs. longer-range operational radar-rainfall error statistics. Hourly aggregate rainfall estimates by XPOL, corrected for rain-path attenuation and vertical reflectivity profile, exhibited correlations between 0.70 and 0.99 against reference rainfall data and 21% mean relative error for rainfall rates above 0.2 mm h−1. The corresponding metrics from the operational radar-network rainfall products gave a strong underestimation (50–70%) and lower correlations (0.48–0.81). For the two highest flow-peak events, a hydrological model (Kinematic Local Excess Model) was forced with the different radar-rainfall estimations and in situ rain gauge precipitation data at hourly resolution, exhibiting close agreement between the XPOL and gauge-based driven runoff simulations, while the simulations obtained by the operational radar rainfall products resulted in a greatly underestimated runoff response.

scholarly journals Correction of Reflectivity in the Presence of Partial Beam Blockage over a Mountainous Region Using X-Band Dual Polarization Radar

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 744-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shakti P. C., ◽  
M. Maki ◽  
S. Shimizu ◽  
T. Maesaka ◽  
D.-S. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Mountainous Region ◽  
Dual Polarization ◽  
Mountainous Regions ◽  
Ground Clutter ◽  
X Band ◽  
Elevation Model ◽  
Reflectivity Data ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract Two approaches to correcting the partial beam blockage of radar reflectivity in mountainous areas were evaluated using X-band dual polarization radar data from the Hakone mountain region, Kanto, Japan. The comparatively simple digital elevation model (DEM) method calculates the power loss in the received signal based on the geometrical relationship between radar beams and a DEM. The second approach, the modified DEM method, attempts to account for unknown power losses related to ground clutter, hardware calibration errors, etc. Comparison between ground data and reflectivity data corrected by both methods suggests that the DEM method alone was insufficient to correct beam blockage problems but that the modified DEM data were in generally good agreement with the ground data. The authors also estimated 10-min rainfall amounts using reflectivity corrected by the modified DEM method and compared these with data from a network of rain gauges in the mountainous region. In general, the results show good agreement between radar estimates and rain gauge measurements. On the basis of their results, the authors conclude that the modified DEM method offers a suitable solution to the problem of beam blockage in mountainous regions, provided that the beam blockage rate is less than 80%.

scholarly journals Correcting Radar Rainfall Estimates Based on Ground Elevation Function

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 300
Author(s):  
Roby Hambali ◽  
Djoko Legono ◽  
Rachmad Jayadi
Keyword(s):  
Correction Method ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Real Time System ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Rainfall Condition ◽  
Correction Process ◽  
R Ratio ◽  
X Band ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Rainfall Estimates

X-band radar gives several advantages for quantitative rainfall estimation, involving higher spatial and temporal resolution, also the ability to reduce attenuation effects and hardware calibration errors. However, the estimates error due to attenuation in heavy rainfall condition cannot be avoided. In the mountainous region, the impact of topography is considered to contribute to radar rainfall estimates error. To have more reliable estimated radar rainfall to be used in various applications, a rainfall estimates correction needs to be applied. This paper discusses evaluation and correction techniques for radar rainfall estimates based on ground elevation function. The G/R ratio is used as a primary method in the correction process. The novel approach proposed in this study is the use of correction factor derived from the relationship between Log (G/R) parameter and elevation difference between radar and rain gauge stations. A total of 4590 pairs of rainfall data from X-band MP radar and 15 rain gauge stations in the Mt. Merapi region were used in evaluation and correction process. The results show the correction method based on the elevation function is relatively good in correcting radar rainfall depth with values of Log (G/R) decreased up to 81.1%, particularly for light rainfall (≤ 20 mm/hour) condition. Also, the method is simple to apply in a real-time system.

scholarly journals Retrieval of lower-order moments of the drop size distribution using CSU-CHILL X-band polarimetric radar: a case study

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 4727-4750
Author(s):  
Viswanathan Bringi ◽  
Kumar Vijay Mishra ◽  
Merhala Thurai ◽  
Patrick C. Kennedy ◽  
Timothy H. Raupach
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Lower Order ◽  
Drop Size ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Drop Size Distribution ◽  
Polarimetric Radar ◽  
X Band ◽  
Double Moment ◽  
Differential Reflectivity

Abstract. The lower-order moments of the drop size distribution (DSD) have generally been considered difficult to retrieve accurately from polarimetric radar data because these data are related to higher-order moments. For example, the 4.6th moment is associated with a specific differential phase and the 6th moment with reflectivity and ratio of high-order moments with differential reflectivity. Thus, conventionally, the emphasis has been to estimate rain rate (3.67th moment) or parameters of the exponential or gamma distribution for the DSD. Many double-moment “bulk” microphysical schemes predict the total number concentration (the 0th moment of the DSD, or M0) and the mixing ratio (or equivalently, the 3rd moment M3). Thus, it is difficult to compare the model outputs directly with polarimetric radar observations or, given the model outputs, forward model the radar observables. This article describes the use of double-moment normalization of DSDs and the resulting stable intrinsic shape that can be fitted by the generalized gamma (G-G) distribution. The two reference moments are M3 and M6, which are shown to be retrievable using the X-band radar reflectivity, differential reflectivity, and specific attenuation (from the iterative correction of measured reflectivity Zh using the total Φdp constraint, i.e., the iterative ZPHI method). Along with the climatological shape parameters of the G-G fit to the scaled/normalized DSDs, the lower-order moments are then retrieved more accurately than possible hitherto. The importance of measuring the complete DSD from 0.1 mm onwards is emphasized using, in our case, an optical array probe with 50 µm resolution collocated with a two-dimensional video disdrometer with about 170 µm resolution. This avoids small drop truncation and hence the accurate calculation of lower-order moments. A case study of a complex multi-cell storm which traversed an instrumented site near the CSU-CHILL radar is described for which the moments were retrieved from radar and compared with directly computed moments from the complete spectrum measurements using the aforementioned two disdrometers. Our detailed validation analysis of the radar-retrieved moments showed relative bias of the moments M0 through M2 was <15 % in magnitude, with Pearson’s correlation coefficient >0.9. Both radar measurement and parameterization errors were estimated rigorously. We show that the temporal variation of the radar-retrieved mass-weighted mean diameter with M0 resulted in coherent “time tracks” that can potentially lead to studies of precipitation evolution that have not been possible so far.

scholarly journals Optimization of X-Band Radar Rainfall Retrieval in the Southern Andes of Ecuador Using a Random Forest Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (14) ◽  
pp. 1632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Orellana-Alvear ◽  
Rolando Célleri ◽  
Rütger Rollenbeck ◽  
Jörg Bendix
Keyword(s):  
Random Forest ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
High Mountain ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
High Attenuation ◽  
X Band ◽  
Precipitation Estimation

Despite many efforts of the radar community, quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) from weather radar data remains a challenging topic. The high resolution of X-band radar imagery in space and time comes with an intricate correction process of reflectivity. The steep and high mountain topography of the Andes enhances its complexity. This study aims to optimize the rainfall derivation of the highest X-band radar in the world (4450 m a.s.l.) by using a random forest (RF) model and single Plan Position Indicator (PPI) scans. The performance of the RF model was evaluated in comparison with the traditional step-wise approach by using both, the Marshall-Palmer and a site-specific Z–R relationship. Since rain gauge networks are frequently unevenly distributed and hardly available at real time in mountain regions, bias adjustment was neglected. Results showed an improvement in the step-wise approach by using the site-specific (instead of the Marshall-Palmer) Z–R relationship. However, both models highly underestimate the rainfall rate (correlation coefficient < 0.69; slope up to 12). Contrary, the RF model greatly outperformed the step-wise approach in all testing locations and on different rainfall events (correlation coefficient up to 0.83; slope = 1.04). The results are promising and unveil a different approach to overcome the high attenuation issues inherent to X-band radars.

Effects of Radar Beam Shielding on Rainfall Estimation for the Polarimetric C-Band Radar

2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1839-1859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Friedrich ◽  
Urs Germann ◽  
Jonathan J. Gourley ◽  
Pierre Tabary
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Drop Size ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Drop Size Distribution ◽  
Rainfall Estimation ◽  
Axis Ratio ◽  
Radar Beam ◽  
Average Rainfall ◽  
Rain Events ◽  
Rainfall Estimates

Abstract Radar reflectivity (Zh), differential reflectivity (Zdr), and specific differential phase (Kdp) measured from the operational, polarimetric weather radar located in Trappes, France, were used to examine the effects of radar beam shielding on rainfall estimation. The objective of this study is to investigate the degree of immunity of Kdp-based rainfall estimates to beam shielding for C-band radar data during four typical rain events encountered in Europe. The rain events include two cold frontal rainbands with average rainfall rates of 7 and 17 mm h−1, respectively, and two summertime convective rain events with average rainfall rates of 11 and 22 mm h−1. The large effects of beam shielding on rainfall accumulation were observed for algorithms using Zh and Zdr with differences of up to ∼2 dB (40%) compared to a Kdp-based algorithm over a power loss range of 0–8 dB. This analysis reveals that Zdr and Kdp are not affected by partial beam shielding. Standard reflectivity corrections based on the degree of beam shielding would have overestimated rainfall rates by up to 1.5 dB for less than 40% beam shielding and up to 3 dB for beam shielding less than 75%. The investigation also examined the sensitivity of beam shielding effects on rainfall rate estimation to (i) axis–ratio parameterization and drop size distribution, (ii) methods used to smooth profiles of differential propagation phase (ϕdp) and estimate Kdp, and (iii) event-to-event variability. Although rainfall estimates were sensitive to drop size distribution and axis–ratio parameterization, differences between Zh- and Kdp-based rainfall rates increased independently from those parameters with amount of shielding. Different approaches to smoothing ϕdp profiles and estimating Kdp were examined and showed little impact on results.

scholarly journals Comparison of dual-polarization radar-derived and disdrometer drop-size distributions with S- and X- band radars

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Jordan A. Wendt
Keyword(s):  
Drop Size ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Precipitation Event ◽  
Drop Diameter ◽  
Size Distributions ◽  
Dual Polarization ◽  
X Band ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Drop Size Distributions ◽  
Differential Reflectivity

There have been many studies on the evaluations of drop-size distributions and the parameters that affect these distributions, however, few, if any, have directly compared the relationship between the radar-derived parameters and those parameters that are disdrometer-derived. This study focuses on many different features of thunderstorms that changes the structure of the drop-size distribution (DSD) including: Horizontal reflectivity (ZH), differential reflectivity (ZDR), median drop diameter (D0), the shape parameter of the gamma-distributed DSD ([mu]), and the slope parameter of the gamma-distributed DSD (lambda). This work compares data collected by two disdrometers (OTT PARSIVEL and the Campbell Scientific Present Weather Sensor 100) against DSD parameters derived from dual-polarization radar observations. Using the Warning Decision Support System-Integrated Information (WDSS-II), radar data was merged at 1-km resolution to account for the movement of the precipitation systems before comparing to the 10-minute disdrometer data intervals. It was found that to accurately estimate DSDs from the perspective of using a weather radar, a larger precipitation event is needed. At the beginning and end of a precipitation event the difference between the radar retrieved values of D0, [mu], and [lambda] and those sampled by the disdrometer were much greater than during the middle of the event. Throughout the majority of the cases, the radar-derived reflectivity values were consistently lower than those collected by the disdrometers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document