scholarly journals Influence of head orientation on perceived gaze direction and eye-region information

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yumiko Otsuka ◽  
Colin W. G. Clifford
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 180885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin J. Palmer ◽  
Nathan Caruana ◽  
Colin W. G. Clifford ◽  
Kiley J. Seymour

The perceptual mechanisms that underlie social experience in schizophrenia are increasingly becoming a target of empirical research. In the context of low-level vision, there is evidence for a reduction in the integration of sensory features in schizophrenia (e.g. increased thresholds for contour detection and motion coherence). In the context of higher-level vision, comparable differences in the integration of sensory features of the face could in theory impair the recognition of important social cues. Here we examine how the sense of where other people are looking relies upon the integration of eye-region cues and head-region cues. Adults with schizophrenia viewed face images designed to elicit the ‘Wollaston illusion’, a perceptual phenomenon in which the perceived gaze direction associated with a given pair of eyes is modulated by the surrounding sensory context. We performed computational modelling of these psychophysical data to quantify individual differences in the use of facial cues to gaze direction. We find that adults with schizophrenia exhibit a robust perceptual effect whereby their sense of other people's direction of gaze is strongly biased by sensory cues relating to head orientation in addition to eye region information. These results indicate that the visual integration of facial cues to gaze direction in schizophrenia is intact, helping to constrain theories of reduced integrative processing in higher-level and lower-level vision. In addition, robust gaze processing was evident in the tested participants despite reduced performance on a theory of mind task designed to assess higher-level social cognition.


Perception ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 588-599
Author(s):  
Heiko Hecht ◽  
Stefanie Siebrand ◽  
Sven Thönes

In the early 19th century, William H. Wollaston impressed the Royal Society of London with engravings of portraits. He manipulated facial features, such as the nose, and thereby dramatically changed the perceived gaze direction, although the eye region with iris and eye socket had remained unaltered. This Wollaston illusion has been replicated numerous times but never with the original stimuli. We took the eyes (pupil and iris) from Wollaston’s most prominent engraving and measured their perceived gaze direction in an analog fashion. We then systematically added facial features (eye socket, eyebrows, nose, skull, and hair). These features had the power to divert perceived gaze direction by up to 20°, which confirms Wollaston’s phenomenal observation. The effect can be thought of as an attractor effect, that is, cues that indicate a slight change in head orientation have the power to divert perceived gaze direction.


2008 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Ricciardelli ◽  
Jon Driver

Several past studies have considered how perceived head orientation may be combined with perceived gaze direction in judging where someone else is attending. In three experiments we tested the impact of different sources of information by examining the role of head orientation in gaze-direction judgements when presenting: (a) the whole face; (b) the face with the nose masked; (c) just the eye region, removing all other head-orientation cues apart from some visible part of the nose; or (d) just the eyes, with all parts of the nose masked and no head orientation cues present other than those within the eyes themselves. We also varied time pressure on gaze direction judgements. The results showed that gaze judgements were not solely driven by the eye region. Gaze perception can also be affected by parts of the head and face, but in a manner that depends on the time constraints for gaze direction judgements. While “positive” congruency effects were found with time pressure (i.e., faster left/right judgements of seen gaze when the seen head deviated towards the same side as that gaze), the opposite applied without time pressure.


Neuroscience ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 169 (1) ◽  
pp. 287-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Tazumi ◽  
E. Hori ◽  
R.S. Maior ◽  
T. Ono ◽  
H. Nishijo

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 1425-1439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yumiko Otsuka ◽  
Isabelle Mareschal ◽  
Andrew J. Calder ◽  
Colin W. G. Clifford

Psychology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1493-1510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Weigelt ◽  
Iris Güldenpenning ◽  
Yvonne Steggemann-Weinrich

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Doussot ◽  
Olivier J. N. Bertrand ◽  
Martin Egelhaaf

Bumblebees perform complex flight maneuvers around the barely visible entrance of their nest upon their first departures. During these flights bees learn visual information about the surroundings, possibly including its spatial layout. They rely on this information to return home. Depth information can be derived from the apparent motion of the scenery on the bees' retina. This motion is shaped by the animal's flight and orientation: Bees employ a saccadic flight and gaze strategy, where rapid turns of the head (saccades) alternate with flight segments of apparently constant gaze direction (intersaccades). When during intersaccades the gaze direction is kept relatively constant, the apparent motion contains information about the distance of the animal to environmental objects, and thus, in an egocentric reference frame. Alternatively, when the gaze direction rotates around a fixed point in space, the animal perceives the depth structure relative to this pivot point, i.e., in an allocentric reference frame. If the pivot point is at the nest-hole, the information is nest-centric. Here, we investigate in which reference frames bumblebees perceive depth information during their learning flights. By precisely tracking the head orientation, we found that half of the time, the head appears to pivot actively. However, only few of the corresponding pivot points are close to the nest entrance. Our results indicate that bumblebees perceive visual information in several reference frames when they learn about the surroundings of a behaviorally relevant location.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter Moors ◽  
Karl Verfaillie ◽  
Thalia Daems ◽  
Iwona Pomianowska ◽  
Filip Germeys

2009 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
pp. 1723-1737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirokazu Doi ◽  
Kazuhiro Ueda ◽  
Kazuyuki Shinohara

The human visual system is extremely sensitive to the directions of the gazes of others. However, the mechanism underlying gaze direction perception has yet to be clarified. The primary aim of the present study is to investigate whether the relational property between the local eye region and other facial regions serves as the primary visual system cue in detecting a direct gaze. Our results showed that search efficiency was determined primarily by the gaze direction indicated by the relational property regardless of the direction indicated by the local feature information of the eye region; this was true even when the gaze directions indicated by these two types of information were conflicting. These results bolster the hypothesis that the human visual system primarily accesses socially meaningful information in searching for a deviant gaze.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document