Alveolar Ridge Preservation with nc-HA and d-PTFE Membrane: A Clinical, Histologic, and Histomorphometric Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenica Laurito ◽  
Marco Lollobrigida ◽  
Francesca Gianno ◽  
Sandro Bosco ◽  
Luca Lamazza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Ptfe Membrane ◽  
Histomorphometric Study ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Preservation

scholarly journals Alveolar ridge preservation using dense-PTFE membrane without the need of primary closure.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioulia Arapi ◽  
Chara Chatzichalepli ◽  
Agamemnon Chliaoutakis ◽  
Katsoulas Vasileios ◽  
GEORGIOS NTAGIANTIS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Closure ◽  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Ptfe Membrane ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Preservation

scholarly journals The Use of a Non-Absorbable Membrane as an Occlusive Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A One Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piero Papi ◽  
Bianca Di Murro ◽  
Marco Tromba ◽  
Pier Carmine Passarelli ◽  
Antonio D’Addona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Ptfe Membrane ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Preservation ◽  
Mean Width ◽  
Ridge Width ◽  
One Year

The aims of this study were to obtain preliminary data and test the clinical efficacy of a novel nonporous dense-polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membrane (permamem®, botiss) in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures with a flapless approach. A traumatic extraction was performed in the premolar maxillary area, and a d-PTFE membrane was used to seal the alveolar cavity: no biomaterial was used to graft the socket and the membrane was left intentionally exposed and stabilized with sutures. The membrane was removed after four weeks and dental implants were placed four months after the procedure. The primary outcome variables were defined as the dimensional changes in the ridge width and height after four months. A total of 15 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean width of the alveolar cavity was 8.9 ± 1.1 mm immediately after tooth extraction, while four months later a mean reduction of 1.75 mm was experienced. A mean vertical reduction of 0.9 ± 0.42 mm on the buccal aspect and 0.6 ± 0.23 mm on the palatal aspect were recorded at implant placement. Within the limitations of this study, the d-PTFE membrane proved to be effective in alveolar ridge preservation, with the outcomes of the regeneration not affected by the complete exposure of this biomaterial.

scholarly journals Alveolar ridge preservation using dense‐PTFE membrane without the need of primary closure

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (S19) ◽  
pp. 469-469
Author(s):  
Ioulia Arapi ◽  
Vasileios Katsoulas ◽  
Chara Chatzichalepli ◽  
Agamemnon Chliaoutakis ◽  
Georgios Ntagiantis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Closure ◽  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Ptfe Membrane ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Preservation

scholarly journals The Use of Autogenous Teeth for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1853
Author(s):  
João Cenicante ◽  
João Botelho ◽  
Vanessa Machado ◽  
José João Mendes ◽  
Paulo Mascarenhas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Natural Consequence ◽  
Oral Rehabilitation ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
The Past ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Preservation ◽  
Functional Consequences ◽  
Teeth Extraction

Alveolar ridge resorption is a natural consequence of teeth extraction, with unpleasant aesthetic and functional consequences that might compromise a future oral rehabilitation. To minimize the biological consequences of alveolar ridge resorption, several surgical procedures have been designed, the so-called alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques. One important characteristic is the concomitant use of biomaterial in ARP. In the past decade, autogenous teeth as a bone graft material in post-extraction sockets have been proposed with very interesting outcomes, yet with different protocols of preparation. Here we summarize the available evidence on autogenous teeth as a biomaterial in ARP, its different protocols and future directions.

scholarly journals A retrospective cohort study of how alveolar ridge preservation affects the need of alveolar ridge augmentation at posterior tooth implant sites

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Fang Hu ◽  
Ying-Chu Lin ◽  
Yu-Ting Huang ◽  
Yu-Hsiang Chou
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Posterior Tooth ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Preservation ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Treatment Plans

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to assess whether alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) can reduce the need of ridge augmentation at posterior tooth sites. Material and methods This study enrolled patients who received dental implants at posterior tooth sites during 2013–2019. Demographic data and dental treatment histories were collected. Based on healing patterns after tooth extraction, patients were divided into ARP and spontaneous healing (SH) groups. Three surgical treatment plans were devised according to the alveolar bone volume on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The three treatment plans were to perform implant alone, simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) and implantation, and staged GBR before implantation. Statistical analyses were performed to determine relationships. Results There were 92 implant records in the ARP group and 249 implant records in the SH group. A significant intergroup difference was observed regarding the frequency distribution of the treatment modality of staged GBR before implant (χ2 = 15.07, p = 0.0005). Based on the implant alone treatment modality and simple logistic regression, the SH pattern was related to staged GBR before implant (SH vs. ARP: crude odds ratio (OR) = 4.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.15–11.61, p = 0.0003). After adjusting confounding factors, the risk was still significant (adjusted OR = 5.02, 95% CI = 2.26–12.85, p = 0.0002). Conclusions The study results suggested that ARP is more likely to lead to the treatment modality of implant alone and reduce the need for staged GBR before implantation. Clinical relevance This study describes ARP capable of minimizing the need for staged GBR before implantation and shortening the treatment duration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document