scholarly journals Flexural Strength of Glass Carbomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement Stored in Different Storage Media over Time

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ali Faridi ◽  
Abdul Khabeer ◽  
Saad Haroon
Keyword(s):  
Flexural Strength ◽  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Bending Test ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Storage Media ◽  
Unique Factor ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Objectives: Glass ionomer cement (GIC) is routinely placed as a restorative material in dentistry. However, due to its poor physical properties, its use is limited to cases where the level of stress on restoration is minimal. Improved formulations of GIC have been developed to overcome these drawbacks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate flexural strength of a conventional GIC (Fuji IX) against a newly developed glass carbomer cement (GCP). Materials and Methods: For Fuji IX and GCP, a total of 80 blocks were prepared and divided into 16 groups (n = 5). These groups were further categorized according to the storage medium (artificial saliva and Vaseline) and time intervals (24 h and 1, 2, and 4 weeks). A 3-point bending test was carried out, and statistical analysis was done using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests. Results: Fuji IX showed a mean flexural strength of 25.14 ± 13.02 versus 24.27 ± 12.57 MPa for GCP. There was no significant statistical difference between both materials when compared under storage media. Both materials showed the highest value for flexural strength at 2 weeks of storage and lowest at 4 weeks. Conclusion: The storage media do not affect the flexural strength of the specimens with reference to time. Time is the unique factor with relative influence on mean resistance to fracture. Further testing is required to evaluate the true potential of the newly developed GCP.

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement and Cention N in Artificial Medium Over Time Intervals - An In-Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (32) ◽  
pp. 2609-2614
Author(s):  
Risana K. ◽  
Prathyusha P ◽  
Amith Adyanthaya ◽  
Aparna Sivaraman ◽  
Nazreen Ayub K ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flexural Strength ◽  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Bending Test ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Storage ◽  
Ionomer Cement

BACKGROUND Glass ionomer cement (GIC) is a versatile restorative cement in paediatric dentistry. Due to its less flexural strength, alternative materials have been developed. Cention N is one such material, but since it’s a new material evidence is lacking regarding its physical properties, especially flexural strength for evaluating its clinical outcome. We wanted to compare the flexural strength of glass ionomer cement and Cention N stored in artificial saliva and its variation over different time intervals, i.e., after 24 hours, 1 week and 4 weeks. METHODS A total of 30 specimens were prepared for GIC (Fuji IX) and Cention N and were further categorized according to the duration of storage time of 24 hours, 1 week and 4 weeks (N = 10). A 3 - point bending test using a universal testing machine was used to evaluate the flexural strength. RESULTS GIC Fuji IX showed a mean flexural strength of 35.296 ± 1.61 Mpa at the end of 24 hours, 47.234 ± 4.12 after 1 week and 66.039 ± 11.05 Mpa at the end of 4 weeks. GIC showed a statistically significant increase of flexural strength from 24 hours to one week and a further increase after 4 weeks of storage. The flexural strength of Cention N at 24 hours was 175.985 ± 22.11 Mpa, at the end of one week was 163.486 ± 17.55 MPa, and after 4 weeks was 175.437 ± 27.22 Mpa. Cention N did not show any statistically significant change in flexural strength value from 24 hours to 4 weeks. Cention N showed highly significant difference between flexural strength compared to GIC at all - time intervals. CONCLUSIONS Cention N has a superior flexural strength compared to GIC at all - time intervals. KEY WORDS Cention N, Flexural Strength, Glass Ionomer Cement

scholarly journals Effects of Powdery Cellulose Nanofiber Addition on the Properties of Glass Ionomer Cement

Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (19) ◽  
pp. 3077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takako Nishimura ◽  
Yukari Shinonaga ◽  
Chikoto Nagaishi ◽  
Rie Imataki ◽  
Michiko Takemura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flexural Strength ◽  
Cellulose Nanofibers ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Chemical Properties ◽  
Fluoride Ion ◽  
Strength Testing ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ion Release ◽  
Diametral Tensile Strength ◽  
Ionomer Cement

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of the addition of powdery cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) on the mechanical properties of glass ionomer cement (GIC) without negatively affecting its chemical properties. Commercial GIC was reinforced with powdery CNFs (2–8 wt.%) and characterized in terms of flexural strength, compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and fluoride-ion release properties. Powdery CNFs and samples subjected to flexural strength testing were observed via scanning electron microscopy. CNF incorporation was found to significantly improve the flexural, compressive, and diametral tensile strengths of GIC, and the corresponding composite was shown to contain fibrillar aggregates of nanofibers interspersed in the GIC matrix. No significant differences in fluoride-ion release properties were observed between the control GIC and the CNF-GIC composite. Thus, powdery CNFs were concluded to be a promising GIC reinforcement agent.

In Vitro Evaluation of Microleakage and Microhardness of Ethanolic Extracts of Propolis in Different Proportions Added to Glass Ionomer Cement

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Altunsoy ◽  
Mehmet Tanrıver ◽  
Uğur Türkan ◽  
Mehmet Emin Uslu ◽  
Sibel Silici
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Antibacterial Properties ◽  
Dental Practice ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Tukey Test ◽  
Ethanolic Extracts ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
One Way Anova ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Objective: To evaluate the effect of ethanolic extracts of propolis (EEP) addition in different proportions to glass ionomer cement (GIC) on microleakage and microhardness of GIC. Study design: The cement was divided into four groups: one using the original composition and three with 10%, 25%, and 50% EEP added to the liquid and then manipulated. For microleakage assessment, sixty primary molars were randomly divided into four groups (n=15). Standard Class II cavities were prepared and then filled with EEP in different proportions added to GICs. Microleakage test was performed using a dye penetration method. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Mann - Whitney U tests (α = 0.05). Disc shaped specimens were prepared from the tested GIC to determine Vickers hardness (VHN). The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test (α = 0.05). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of microleakage (p > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences between the VHN values of groups (p < 0.05). Increasing addition of EEP to GIC statistically significantly increased VHN value of GIC (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The addition of EEP to GIC increased the microhardness of the GIC and did not adversely affect the microleakage. Thus, it might be used during routine dental practice due to its antibacterial properties

scholarly journals Mechanical Properties Enhancement of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement by Adding Zirconium Oxide Micro and Nanoparticles

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali N. Alobiedy ◽  
Ali H. Alhille ◽  
Ahmed R. Al-Hamaoy
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Flexural Strength ◽  
Wear Rate ◽  
Zirconium Oxide ◽  
Dental Materials ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Nano Particles ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Biaxial Flexural Strength ◽  
Ionomer Cement

The aim of this work is to enhance the mechanical properties of the glass ionomer cement GIC (dental materials) by adding Zirconium Oxide ZrO2 in both micro and nano particles. GIC were mixed with (3, 5 and 7) wt% of both ZrO2 micro and nanoparticles separately. Compressive strength (CS), biaxial flexural strength (BFS), Vickers Microhardness (VH) and wear rate losses (WR) were investigated. The maximum compression strength was 122.31 MPa with 5 wt. % ZrO2 micro particle, while 3wt% nanoparticles give highest Microhardness and biaxial flexural strength of 88.8 VHN and 35.79 MPa respectively. The minimum wear rate losses were 3.776µg/m with 7 wt. % ZrO2 nanoparticle. GIC-containing ZrO2 micro and nanoparticles is a promising restorative material with improved mechanical properties expect wear rate losses.  

Comparison of the Solubility of Conventional Luting Cements with that of the Polyacid Modified Composite Luting Cement and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1016-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathew Thomas ◽  
Mohammed Mustafa ◽  
Reshma Karkera ◽  
AP Nirmal Raj ◽  
Lijo Isaac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Zinc Phosphate ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Luting Cement ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

ABSTRACT Introduction This study was planned to find the solubility of the conventional luting cements in comparison with that of the polyacid-modified composite luting cement and recently introduced resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) with exposure to water at early stages of mixing. Materials and methods An in vitro study of the solubility of the following five commercially available luting cements, viz., glass ionomer cement (GIC) (Fuji I, GC), zinc phosphate (Elite 100, GC), polyacid-modified resin cement (PMCR) (Principle, Dentsply), polycarboxylate cement (PC) (Poly - F, Dentsply), RMGIC (Vitremer, 3M), was conducted. For each of these groups of cements, three resin holders were prepared containing two circular cavities of 5 mm diameter and 2 mm depth. All the cements to be studied were mixed in 30 seconds and then placed in the prepared cavities in the resin cement holder for 30 seconds. Results From all of the observed luting cements, PMCR cement had shown the lowest mean loss of substance at all immersion times and RMGIC showed the highest mean loss of substance at all immersion times in water from 2 to 8 minutes. The solubility of cements decreased by 38% for GIC, 33% for ZnPO4, 50% for PMCR, 29% for PC, and 17% for RMGIC. Conclusion The PMCR cement (Principle-Dentsply) had shown lowest solubility to water at the given time intervals of immersion. This was followed by PC, zinc phosphate, and GIC to various time intervals of immersion. How to cite this article Karkera R, Nirmal Raj AP, Isaac L, Mustafa M, Reddy RN, Thomas M. Comparison of the Solubility of Conventional Luting Cements with that of the Polyacid Modified Composite Luting Cement and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(12):1016-1021.

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Static and Viscoelastic Mechanical Behavior of Different Luting Material Categories after Aging

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1452
Author(s):  
Nicoleta Ilie
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Mechanical Behavior ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Bending Test ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Aging Behavior ◽  
Depth Sensing ◽  
Dynamic Mechanical ◽  
Luting Material ◽  
Ionomer Cement

The longevity of indirect restorations is primarily determined by the appropriate selection of the luting material. The function of a luting material is to seal the restoration and hold it in place for the time required for service. The mechanical behavior of luting materials and in particular their aging behavior, therefore, play a decisive role. The study provides a comparative analysis of the static and dynamic mechanical behavior of the most commonly used luting material categories—zinc phosphate cement, glass–ionomer cement, resin-modified glass–ionomer cement, resin-based composites, and self-adhesive resin-based composites—and their aging behavior. It also takes into account that luting materials are viscoelastic materials, i.e., materials that respond to external loading in a way that lies between an elastic solid and a viscous liquid. Flexural strength and modulus were determined in a three-point bending test followed by fractography analysis. The quasi-static and viscoelastic behavior was analyzed by a depth-sensing indentation test provided with a dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) module at 20 different frequencies (1–50 Hz). The fracture toughness was evaluated in a notchless triangular prism (NTP) test. Material type exhibits the strongest influence on all measured properties, while the effect of aging becomes more evident in the material reliability. The variation of the viscoelastic parameters with aging reflects cement maturation or polymer plasticization.

scholarly journals The Effect of Adding Hydroxyapatite on the Flexural Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement

2003 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji ARITA ◽  
Milanita E. LUCAS ◽  
Mizuho NISHINO
Keyword(s):  
Flexural Strength ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

scholarly journals Bond strength of a resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement associated or not with chlorhexidine to eroded dentin

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Flavia Pardo Salata Nahsan ◽  
Martha Beteghelli Michielin ◽  
Luciana Mendonça Da Silva ◽  
Camila Moreira Machado ◽  
Andréa Mello De Andrade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Cervical Region ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Prior Application ◽  
Ionomer Cement

<p><strong>Objective</strong>: Even resin composites and glass-ionomer cements are widely used for dental cervical region restorations, under erosive condition they can wear out quickly. This study aimed to compare, by means of bond strength by microshear, the performance of a resin composite (RC) and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) to eroded dentin and its association with 2% chlorhexidine up to 6 months. <strong>Material</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Methods</strong>:. Eighty  sound third molars teeth were cutt to obtain flat coronal dentin, which were subsequently embedded in self-curing acrylic resin circular molds exposing only this surface available. Teeth were divided into two groups, according to the treatment with the Adper Single Bond 2 + RC Filtek Z250 (Z) or the RMGIC Vitremer (V). Half of the specimens were immersed in artificial saliva-AS for 24 hours (control groups) and half subjected to 3x/1 minute daily immersion in Regular Coca Cola ®-RC for 5 days. Half of the specimens for each described condition were treated with water and half with 2% chlorhexidine for 1 minute prior the restoration. For all groups, the specimens were stored in artificial saliva weekly renewed up to tests. The bonding strength was evaluated by  microshear test after 1 month and 6 months . Data, in normal distribution, were analyzed with 3-way ANOVA and Tukey (p &lt;0.05). <strong>Results</strong>: Challenge factors, materials and time were statistically significant.. Restorations with Z showed significantly higher bond strength compared to V in all situations. There was a reduction in bond strength values over time for all tested conditions. The prior application of 2% chlorhexidine was able to preserve the Z bond strength between 1 and 6 months, but this factor was not statistically significant. <strong>Conclusion</strong>: For eroded dentin, the use of resin composite seems presents greater bond strength compared to resin-modified glass-material, disregarding their association to chlorhexidine or not.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document