Fine-Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Head and Neck Growths: The Pitfalls of False-Positive Diagnosis

ORL ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Philippe Guyot ◽  
Serge Auberson ◽  
Dragan Obradovic ◽  
Willy Lehmann
1989 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 412-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodolfo Laucirica ◽  
James B. Farnum ◽  
Sophie K. Leopold ◽  
George B. Kalin ◽  
George A. Youngberg

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerzy Klijanienko ◽  
Slavomir Petras ◽  
Lucile De Bosschere ◽  
Benoît Paulmier ◽  
Christophe Le Tourneau ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 400-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan H. Ramadan ◽  
Mark K. Wax ◽  
Carole B. Boyd

2005 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan H. Hughes ◽  
Emily E. Volk ◽  
David C. Wilbur

Abstract Context.—We use data from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology to identify common diagnostic errors in salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Objective.—To identify salivary gland FNA cases with poor performance characteristics in the Nongynecologic Cytology Program surveys, so that the most common diagnostic pitfalls can be avoided. Design.—A retrospective review of the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytology Program's cumulative data from 1999 to 2003 revealed the most common false-positive and false-negative interpretations on FNA for common salivary gland lesions. Slides that performed poorly were then reviewed to identify the cytologic characteristics that may have contributed to their poor performance. Results.—A total of 6249 participant responses with general interpretations of benign (n = 4642) or malignant (n= 1607) were reviewed. The sensitivity and specificity of the participant responses for correctly interpreting the cases as benign or malignant were 73% and 91%, respectively. Benign cases with the highest false-positive rates were monomorphic adenoma (53% false-positive), intraparotid lymph node (36%), oncocytoma (18%), and granulomatous sialadenitis (10%). Malignant cases with the highest false-negative rates were lymphoma (57%), acinic cell carcinoma (49%), low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma (43%), and adenoid cystic carcinoma (33%). Selected review of the most discordant individual cases revealed possible explanations for some of the interpretative errors. Conclusions.—These data confirm the difficulty associated with interpretation of salivary gland FNA specimens. Cytologists should be aware of the potential false-positive and false-negative interpretations that can occur in FNAs from this organ site in order to minimize the possibility of diagnostic errors.


2001 ◽  
Vol 125 (12) ◽  
pp. 1575-1578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamal K. Khurana ◽  
Zubair W. Baloch ◽  
Virginia A. LiVolsi

Abstract Context.—Solitary papillary hyperplastic thyroid nodules (SPHTNs) are frequently encountered in children and teenagers. Although the histologic features are well described, to the best of our knowledge, cytologic findings have not been reported. Objectives.—To review the cytologic features of histologically proven SPHTNs and to identify the potential diagnostic pitfalls in cytologic diagnosis. Materials and Methods.—Fine-needle aspiration cytology of 3 histologically proven SPHTNs was reviewed. Results.—Two girls and 1 boy (ages 11, 12, and 15 years) were affected. The cytologic diagnosis in all 3 cases was suspicious for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The spectrum of cytologic findings included broad flat sheets and 3-dimensional clusters with fire flares. There was mild to moderate nuclear pleomorphism and nuclear atypia. Short nonbranching papillae with transgressing vessels shown to represent hyperplastic papillae on histologic sections were identified in all cases. The background contained giant cells, histiocytes, and watery and inspissated colloid. Although nuclear grooves were identified in occasional cells, intranuclear inclusions were absent. A cell block section (1 case) and histologic sections of SPHTNs (2 cases) were immunohistochemically negative for cytokeratin 19. Conclusions.—Fine-needle aspiration of SPHTNs may be difficult to interpret accurately and can result in false-positive diagnosis of PTC. Although it shares several cytologic features with PTC, the presence of fire flares and short nonbranching papillae, as well as lack of intranuclear inclusions and watery and inspissated colloid in SPHTN appear to be useful features that are helpful in distinguishing SPHTN from PTC. Negative immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin 19 is useful in excluding a diagnosis of PTC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document