Recent Developments in Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy

1997 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Wolf
Keyword(s):  
Scanning Laser ◽  
Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy ◽  
Recent Developments

scholarly journals Myopic retinal changes screening: comparison of sensitivity and specificity among 15 combinations of ultrawide field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy images

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan Deng ◽  
Silvia Tanumiharjo ◽  
Qianyin Chen ◽  
Shengnan Li ◽  
Huimin Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Diagnostic Test ◽  
Scanning Laser ◽  
Test Accuracy ◽  
Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
High Performing ◽  
Primary Screening ◽  
Optimal Evaluation

Aims: To investigate the evaluation indices (diagnostic test accuracy and agreement) of 15 combinations of ultrawide field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (UWF SLO) images in myopic retinal changes (MRC) screening to determine the combination of imaging that yields the highest evaluation indices in screening MRC. Methods: This is a retrospective study of UWF SLO images obtained from myopes and were analyzed by two retinal specialists independently. 5-field UWF SLO images that included the posterior (B), superior (S), inferior (I), nasal (N) and temporal (T) regions were obtained for analysis and its results used as a reference standard. The evaluation indices of different combinations comprising of one to four fields of the retina were compared to determine the abilities of each combinations screen for MRC. Results: UWF SLO images obtained from 823 myopic patients (1646 eyes) were included for the study. Sensitivities ranged from 50.0% to 98.9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 43.8-99.7%); the combinations of B+S+I (97.3%; 95% CI, 94.4-98.8%), B+T+S+I (98.5%; 95% CI, 95.9-99.5%), and B+S+N+I (98.9%; 95% CI, 96.4-99.7%) ranked highest. Furthermore, the combinations of B+S+I, B+T+S+I and B+S+N+I also revealed the highest accuracy (97.7%; 95% CI, 95.1-100.0%, 98.6%; 95% CI, 96.7-100.0%, 98.8%; 95% CI, 96.9-100.0%) and agreement (Kappa = 0.968, 0.980 and 0.980). For the various combinations, specificities were all higher than 99.5% (95% CI, 99.3-100.0%). Conclusion: In our study, screening combinations of B+S+I, B+T+S+I and B+S+N+I stand out with high-performing optimal evaluation indices. However, when time is limited, B+S+I may be more applicable in primary screening of MRC.

scholarly journals Comparing diabetic retinopathy lesions in scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and colour fundus photography

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Zhifa Nghiem ◽  
Paul Nderitu ◽  
Marko Lukic ◽  
Mumina Khatun ◽  
Ross Largan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Fundus Photography ◽  
Scanning Laser ◽  
Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy

Non-mydriatic ultrawide field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy compared with dilated fundal examination for assessment of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema in Chinese individuals with diabetes mellitus

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (9) ◽  
pp. 1327-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon K H Szeto ◽  
Raymond Wong ◽  
Jerry Lok ◽  
Fangyao Tang ◽  
Zihan Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Macular Oedema ◽  
Chinese Population ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Diabetic Macular Oedema ◽  
Scanning Laser ◽  
Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy ◽  
Chinese Cohort ◽  
Clinical Grading

AimsTo evaluate the performance of ultrawide field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (UWF-SLO) for assessing diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular oedema (DME) in a Chinese population, compared with clinical examination.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study. A series of 322 eyes from 164 patients with DM were included. Each patient underwent both dilated fundal examination with DR and DME grading by retina specialist and non-mydriatic 200° UWF-SLO (Daytona, Optos, Dunfermline, UK). The severity of DR and DME from UWF-SLO images was further graded by ophthalmologists, according to both international clinical DR and DME disease severity scales and the standard 7-field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale. Any DR, DME and vision-threatening DR (VTDR) were treated as endpoints for this study.Results23 out of 322 images (7.14%), including all four cases with proliferative DR on clinical examinations, were determined as ungradable. When the international scale was used for grading UWF-SLO images, the sensitivity of any DR, DME and VTDR was 67.7%, 67.4% and 72.6%, respectively; the specificity of any DR, DME and VTDR was 97.8%, 97.3% and 97.8%, respectively. The agreement with clinical grading in picking up any DR, DME and VTDR was substantial, with κ-values of 0.634, 0.694 and 0.707, respectively. The performance of UWF-SLO was shown to be lower when ETDRS scale was used for grading the images.ConclusionThe performance of non-mydriatic UWF-SLO is comparable in identifying DR with that of clinical examination in a Chinese cohort. However, whether UWF-SLO can be considered as tool for screening DR is still undetermined.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document