3D CT analysis of femoral and tibial tunnel positions after modified transtibial single bundle ACL reconstruction with varus and internal rotation of the tibia

The Knee ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 272-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon-Seok Youm ◽  
Sung-Do Cho ◽  
Jin Eo ◽  
Ki-Jae Lee ◽  
Kwang-Hwan Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
3D Ct ◽  
Ct Analysis ◽  
Tunnel Positions

scholarly journals Rate of Tibial Tunnel Malposition Is Not Changed by Drilling Entirely Within the Stump of Preserved Remnants During ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective Comparative 3D-CT Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596712110373
Author(s):  
Vitor Barion C. de Padua ◽  
Adnan Saithna ◽  
Eduardo Federighi B. Chagas ◽  
Tereza Lais M. Zutin ◽  
Lucas Fernandes Piazzalunga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
3D Ct ◽  
Remnant Preservation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tunnel Positions ◽  
Tunnel Positioning

Background: Remnant preservation during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is controversial, and it is unclear whether the stump aids or obscures tibial tunnel positioning. Purpose/Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to determine whether the rate of tibial tunnel malposition is influenced by remnant preservation. The hypothesis was that using a remnant-preserving technique to drill entirely within the tibial stump would result in a significant reduction in tibial tunnel malposition as determined by postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients undergoing ACLR between October 2018 and December 2019 underwent surgery with a remnant-preserving technique (RP group) if they had a large stump present (>50% of the native ACL length) or if there was no remnant or if it was <50% of the native length of the ACL, they underwent remnant ablation (RA group) and use of standard landmarks for tunnel positioning. The postoperative tunnel location was reported as a percentage of the overall anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimensions of the tibia on axial 3D-CT. The tunnel was classified as anatomically placed if the center lay between 30% and 55% of the AP length and between 40% and 51% of the ML length. Results: Overall, 52 patients were included in the study (26 in each group). The mean tunnel positions were 36.8% ± 5.5% AP and 46.7% ± 2.9% ML in the RP group and 35.6% ± 4.8% AP and 47.3% ± 2.3% ML in the RA group. There were no significant differences in the mean AP ( P = .134) and ML ( P = .098) tunnel positions between the groups. Inter- and intraobserver reliability varied between fair to excellent and good to excellent, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of malposition between groups (RP group, 7.7%; RA group, 11.5%; P ≥ .999). Conclusion: Drilling entirely within the ACL tibial stump using a remnant-preserving reconstruction technique did not significantly change the rate of tunnel malposition when compared with stump ablation and utilization of standard landmarks.

Evaluation of Tibial Tunnel Location with the Femoral Tunnel Created Behind the Resident's Ridge in Transtibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuneari Takahashi ◽  
Tomohiro Saito ◽  
Tatsuya Kubo ◽  
Ko Hirata ◽  
Hideaki Sawamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Bone Tunnel ◽  
Femoral Bone ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tunnel Positions ◽  
Tunnel Angle ◽  
Coronal View

AbstractFew studies have determined whether a femoral bone tunnel could be created behind the resident's ridge by using a transtibial (TT) technique-single bundle (SB)-anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The aim of this study was to clarify (1) whether it is possible to create a femoral bone tunnel behind the resident's ridge by using the TT technique with SB ACL reconstruction, (2) to define the mean tibial and femoral tunnel angles during anatomic SB ACL reconstruction, and (3) to clarify the tibial tunnel inlet location when the femoral tunnel is created behind resident's ridge. Arthroscopic TT-SB ACL reconstruction was performed on 36 patients with ACL injuries. The point where 2.4-mm guide pin was inserted was confirmed, via anteromedial portal, to consider a location behind the resident's ridge. Then, an 8-mm diameter femoral tunnel with a 4.5-mm socket was created. Tunnel positions were evaluated by using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) 1 week postoperatively. Quadrant method and the resident's ridge on 3D-CT were evaluated to determine whether femoral tunnel position was anatomical. Radiological evaluations of tunnel positions yielded mean ( ±  standard deviation) X- and Y-axis values for the tunnel centers: femoral tunnel, 25.2% ± 5.1% and 41.6% ± 10.2%; tibial tunnel, 49.2% ± 3.5%, and 31.5% ± 7.7%. The bone tunnels were anatomically positioned in all cases. The femoral tunnel angle relative to femoral axis was 29.4 ± 5.5 degrees in the coronal view and 43.5 ± 8.0 degrees in the sagittal view. The tibial tunnel angle relative to tibial axis was 25.5 ± 5.3 degrees in the coronal view and 52.3 ± 4.6 degrees in the sagittal view. The created tibial bone tunnel inlet had an average distance of 13.4 ± 2.7 mm from the medial tibial joint line and 9.7 ± 1.7 mm medial from the axis of the tibia. Femoral bone tunnel could be created behind the resident's ridge with TT-SB ACL reconstruction. The tibial bone tunnel inlet averaged 13.4 mm from the medial tibial joint line and 9.7 mm medial from the tibia axis.

scholarly journals Stability Outcomes following Computer-Assisted ACL Reconstruction

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Melissa A. Christino ◽  
Bryan G. Vopat ◽  
Alexander Mayer ◽  
Andrew P. Matson ◽  
Steven E. Reinert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Anterior Instability ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
Anterior Translation ◽  
Stability Measurements

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative prereconstruction stability measurements and/or patient characteristics were associated with final knee stability after computer-assisted ACL reconstruction.Methods. This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent computer-assisted single-bundle ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon. Prereconstruction intraoperative stability measurements were correlated with patient characteristics and postreconstruction stability measurements. 143 patients were included (87 male and 56 female). Average age was 29.8 years (SD ± 11.8).Results. Females were found to have significantly more pre- and postreconstruction internal rotation than males (P< 0.001 andP= 0.001, resp.). Patients with additional intra-articular injuries demonstrated more prereconstruction anterior instability than patients with isolated ACL tears (P< 0.001). After reconstruction, these patients also had higher residual anterior translation (P= 0.01). Among all patients with ACL reconstructions, the percent of correction of anterior translation was found to be significantly higher than the percent of correction for internal or external rotation (P< 0.001).Conclusion. Anterior translation was corrected the most using a single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Females had higher pre- and postoperative internal rotation. Patients with additional injuries had greater original anterior translation and less operative correction of anterior translation compared to patients with isolated ACL tears.

Graft Size and Orientation Within the Femoral Notch Affect Graft Healing at 1 Year After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Oshima ◽  
Sven Putnis ◽  
Samuel Grasso ◽  
Antonio Klasan ◽  
David Anthony Parker
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Volume Ratio ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Graft Size ◽  
Graft Healing ◽  
High Resolution Mri ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Femoral Notch

Background: The combined influence of anatomic and operative factors affecting graft healing after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction within the femoral notch is not well understood. Purpose: To determine the influence of graft size and orientation in relation to femoral notch anatomy, with the signal/noise quotient (SNQ) of the graft used as a measure of graft healing after primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 98 patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up after primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts were included. Graft healing was evaluated at 1 year on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan as the mean SNQ measured from 3 regions situated at sites at the proximal, middle, and distal graft. Patient characteristics, chondropenia severity score, tunnel sizes, tunnel locations, graft bending angle (GBA), graft sagittal angle, posterior tibial slope (PTS), graft length, graft volume, femoral notch volume, and graft-notch volume ratio (measured using postoperative 3-T high-resolution MRI) were evaluated to determine any association with 1-year graft healing. The correlation between 1-year graft healing and clinical outcome at minimum 2 years was also assessed. Results: There was no significant difference in mean SNQ between male and female patients ( P > .05). Univariate regression analysis showed that a low femoral tunnel ( P = .005), lateral tibial tunnel ( P = .009), large femoral tunnel ( P = .011), large tibial tunnel ( P < .001), steep lateral PTS ( P = .010), steep medial PTS ( P = .004), acute graft sagittal angle ( P < .001), acute GBA ( P < .001), large graft volume ( P = .003), and high graft-notch volume ratio ( P < .001) were all associated with higher graft SNQ values. A multivariate regression analysis showed 2 significant factors: a large graft-notch volume ratio ( P = .001) and an acute GBA ( P = .004). The 1-year SNQ had a weak correlation with 2-year Tegner Activity Scale score ( r = 0.227; P = .026) but no other clinical findings, such as International Knee Documentation Committee subjective and Lysholm scores and anterior tibial translation side-to-side difference. Conclusion: The 1-year SNQ value had a significant positive association with graft-notch volume ratio and GBA. Both graft size and graft orientation appeared to have a significant influence on graft healing as assessed on 1-year high-resolution MRI scan.

scholarly journals Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Tunnel Location and Angle during Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0009
Author(s):  
Sang Hak Lee ◽  
Kyung Hk Yoon ◽  
Chan Il Bae
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Width Ratio ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Tunnel Length ◽  
Tunnel Position ◽  
The Mean

Purpose: Tibial tunnel-independent drilling has attracted increased interest in recent years for anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the geometry and position of the femoral tunnel between the anteromedial portal (AMP) and outside-in (OI) techniques after anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Methods: We prospectively evaluated 82 patients undergoing single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts using either the AMP (n=40) or OI (n=42) technique. The locations of the tibial and femoral tunnel apertures were assessed by immediate postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) imaging with OsiriX imaging software. The femoral graft bending angle, femoral tunnel aperture shape (height/width ratio), femoral tunnel length, and posterior wall breakage were also measured. Results: The two techniques did not differ significantly in the femoral tunnel position perpendicular to the Blumensaat line. However, the mean femoral tunnel position parallel to the Blumensaat line was more caudally positioned in the AMP group than in the OI group (P=0.025) The two groups did not differ significantly in tibial tunnel position. The mean femoral tunnel length did not differ between the AMP (36.1±0.33 mm) and OI groups (35.6±0.37 mm; P=0.548) The mean femoral graft angle in the OI group (99.6°±7.1°) was significantly more acute than that of the AMP group (108.9°±10.2°) (p < 0.0001). The mean height/width ratio of the AMP group (1.21±0.20) was significantly more ellipsoidal than that of the OI group (1.07±0.09) (p < 0.0001). Posterior wall breakage was detected in 3 cases (7.5%), all in the AMP group. Conclusions: After single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction, 3D CT showed a significantly shallower femoral tunnel in the AMP group than in the OI group. The AMP group had a more ellipsoidal femoral tunnel with a risk of posterior wall breakage than the OI group. The OI group showed a more acute bending angle of the femoral tunnel than the AMP group. [Figure: see text][Figure: see text]

The effect of feedback from post-operative 3D CT on placement of femoral tunnels in single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 154-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eivind Inderhaug ◽  
Allan Larsen ◽  
Torbjørn Strand ◽  
Per Arne Waaler ◽  
Eirik Solheim
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
3D Ct ◽  
Anatomic Acl Reconstruction

Remnant preservation does not affect accuracy of tibial tunnel positioning in single-bundle ACL reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Kosy ◽  
Katie Walmsley ◽  
Elizabeth A. Gordon ◽  
Sadie V. Heddon ◽  
Rahul Anaspure ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Remnant Preservation ◽  
Tunnel Positioning

Tibial Spine Location Influences Tibial Tunnel Placement in Anatomical Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takanori Iriuchishima ◽  
Bunsei Goto
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Tunnel Placement ◽  
Anterior Border ◽  
Medial Border ◽  
Tibial Spine ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tibia Plateau

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to assess the influence of tibial spine location on tibial tunnel placement in anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). A total of 39 patients undergoing anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction were included in this study (30 females and 9 males; average age: 29 ± 15.2 years). In anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction, the tibial and femoral tunnels were created close to the anteromedial bundle insertion site using a transportal technique. Using postoperative 3D-CT, accurate axial views of the tibia plateau were evaluated. By assuming the medial and anterior borders of the tibia plateau as 0% and the lateral and posterior borders as 100%, the location of the medial and lateral tibial spine, and the center of the tibial tunnel were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the correlation between tibial spine location and tibial tunnel placement. The medial tibial spine was located at 54.7 ± 4.5% from the anterior border and 41.3 ± 3% from the medial border. The lateral tibial spine was located at 58.7 ± 5.1% from the anterior border and 55.3 ± 2.8% from the medial border. The ACL tibial tunnel was located at 34.8 ± 7.7% from the anterior border and 48.2 ± 3.4% from the medial border. Mediolateral tunnel placement was significantly correlated with medial and lateral tibial spine location. However, for anteroposterior tunnel placement, no significant correlation was found. A significant correlation was observed between mediolateral ACL tibial tunnel placement and medial and lateral tibial spine location. For clinical relevance, tibial ACL tunnel placement might be unintentionally influenced by tibial spine location. Confirmation of the ACL footprint is required to create accurate anatomical tunnels during surgery. This is a Level III; case–control study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document