Tumors of the Kidney, Renal Pelvis and UreterTumors of the Kidney, Renal Pelvis and Ureter. By LuckéBalduin, M.D., Dr.P.H., Late Professor of Pathology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penna., and SchlumbergerHans G., M.D., Professor of Pathology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Atlas of Tumor Pathology. Section VIII—Fascicle 30. A volume of 210 pages, with 190 illustrations and 9 tables. Published by the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, under the Auspices of the Subcommittee on Oncology of the Committee on Pathology of the Division of Medical Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council, Washington, D. C., 1957. For sale by the American Registry of Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington 25, D. C. Price $2.25.

Radiology ◽  
1957 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 755-755
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 757-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Gatz ◽  
Brenda L. Plassman ◽  
Caroline M. Tanner ◽  
Samuel M. Goldman ◽  
Gary E. Swan ◽  
...  

AbstractThe National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council (NAS-NRC) Twin Registry is one of the oldest, national population-based twin registries in the USA. It comprises 15,924 White male twin pairs born in the years 1917–1927 (N = 31.848), both of whom served in the armed forces, chiefly during World War II. This article updates activities in this registry since the most recent report in Twin Research and Human Genetics (Page, 2006). Records-based data include information from enlistment charts and Veterans Administration data linkages. There have been three major epidemiologic questionnaires and an education and earnings survey. Separate data collection efforts with the NAS-NRC registry include the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) subsample, the Duke Twins Study of Memory in Aging and a clinically based study of Parkinson’s disease. Progress has been made on consolidating the various data holdings of the NAS-NRC Twin Registry. Data that had been available through the National Academy of Sciences are now freely available through National Archive of Computerized Data on Aging (NACDA).


2003 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Fortin ◽  
E. J. Clowes ◽  
A. L. Schaefer

This study was conducted to determine whether feeding gilts (1) at or above their National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council (NAS-NRC 1998) requirements during gestation, and (2) to lose a moderate (~10%) or large (~17%) amount of maternal protein during lactation had a residual effect on their progeny’s growth, carcass characteristics and pork quality at market weight. From each litter, the heaviest and lightest barrows and gilts were selected. The progeny of gilts fed above their requirements during gestation, and those that lost the least body protein during lactation were heavier at weaning; +0.3 kg (P < 0.05) and +0.5 kg (P = 0.01), respectively. However, these liveweight differences, which were associated with the gestation and lactation effects, were no longer evident (P > 0.05) at day 35 or 85 post-weaning. But at slaughter, these animals had thinner (P < 0.01) fat thickness and higher (P < 0.05) predicted salable meat yield. Independently of the gestation and lactation treatments, and compared to the low-weaning-weight pigs, the high- weaning-weight pigs maintained their weight advantage (P < 0.01 at day 35 (+ 2.8 kg) and day 85 (+ 5.4 kg) post-weaning), took 4.5 fewer days (P < 0.01) to reach market weight, but had similar (P > 0.05) carcass characteristics and pork quality. Key words: Gilts, gestational and lactational protein, litter, growth, carcass characteristics and meat quality


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 155
Author(s):  
Sophia Wang

Journal of Mathematics Research wishes to acknowledge the following individuals for their assistance with peer review of manuscripts for this issue. Their help and contributions in maintaining the quality of the journal is greatly appreciated.Many authors, regardless of whether Journal of Mathematics Research publishes their work, appreciate the helpful feedback provided by the reviewers.Reviewers for Volume 9, Number 2  Alberto Simoes, University of Beira Interior, PortugalAli Berkol, Space and Defense Technologies & Baskent University, TurkeyArman Aghili, University of Guilan, IranCecilia Maria Fernandes Fonseca, Polytechnic of Guarda, PortugalGane Sam Lo, Universite Gaston Berger de Saint-Louis, SenegalMarek Brabec, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Czech RepublicMaria Alessandra Ragusa, University of Catania, ItalyMohammad Sajid, Qassim University, Saudi ArabiaMohd Hafiz, Universiti Sains Malaysia, , MalaysiaN. V. Ramana Murty, Andhra Loyola College, IndiaOlivier Heubo-Kwegna, Saginaw Valley State University, USAOmur Deveci, Kafkas University, TurkeyÖzgür Ege, Celal Bayar University, TurkeyPeng Zhang, State University of New York at Stony Brook, USAPhilip Philipoff, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, BulgariaRovshan Bandaliyev, National Academy of Sciences of Azerbaijan, AzerbaijanSanjib Kumar Datta, University of Kalyani, IndiaSelcuk Koyuncu, University of North Georgia, USASergiy Koshkin, University of Houston Downtown, USAShenghua Ni, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, USAVishnu Narayan Mishra, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, IndiaWaleed Al-Rawashdeh, Montana Tech, USAYifan Wang, University of Houston, USAYoussef Ei Foutayeni, Modeling and Simulation Laboratory Lams Hassan II University, MoroccoYoussef El-Khatib, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab EmiratesZoubir Dahmani, University of Mostaganem, Algeria Sophia WangOn behalf of,The Editorial Board of Journal of Mathematics ResearchCanadian Center of Science and Education


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document