scholarly journals Deterministic Algorithms for Submodular Maximization Problems

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niv Buchbinder ◽  
Moran Feldman
Keyword(s):  
Deterministic Algorithms ◽  
Submodular Maximization

scholarly journals Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Rare Binary Traits Under Different Modes of Inheritance

Genetics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 143 (4) ◽  
pp. 1819-1829 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Thaller ◽  
L Dempfle ◽  
I Hoeschele
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Major Gene ◽  
Likelihood Ratio Statistic ◽  
Information Criterion ◽  
Genetic Models ◽  
Parameter Estimates ◽  
Gene Effects ◽  
Binary Traits ◽  
Deterministic Algorithms

Abstract Maximum likelihood methodology was applied to determine the mode of inheritance of rare binary traits with data structures typical for swine populations. The genetic models considered included a monogenic, a digenic, a polygenic, and three mixed polygenic and major gene models. The main emphasis was on the detection of major genes acting on a polygenic background. Deterministic algorithms were employed to integrate and maximize likelihoods. A simulation study was conducted to evaluate model selection and parameter estimation. Three designs were simulated that differed in the number of sires/number of dams within sires (10/10, 30/30, 100/30). Major gene effects of at least one SD of the liability were detected with satisfactory power under the mixed model of inheritance, except for the smallest design. Parameter estimates were empirically unbiased with acceptable standard errors, except for the smallest design, and allowed to distinguish clearly between the genetic models. Distributions of the likelihood ratio statistic were evaluated empirically, because asymptotic theory did not hold. For each simulation model, the Average Information Criterion was computed for all models of analysis. The model with the smallest value was chosen as the best model and was equal to the true model in almost every case studied.

scholarly journals Some algorithms for maximum volume and cross approximation of symmetric semidefinite matrices

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Massei
Keyword(s):  
Computer Science ◽  
Recent Work ◽  
Linear Algebra ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Approximation Error ◽  
Positive Semidefinite ◽  
Numerical Linear Algebra ◽  
Maximum Volume ◽  
Deterministic Algorithms ◽  
Principal Submatrix

AbstractVarious applications in numerical linear algebra and computer science are related to selecting the $$r\times r$$ r × r submatrix of maximum volume contained in a given matrix $$A\in \mathbb R^{n\times n}$$ A ∈ R n × n . We propose a new greedy algorithm of cost $$\mathcal O(n)$$ O ( n ) , for the case A symmetric positive semidefinite (SPSD) and we discuss its extension to related optimization problems such as the maximum ratio of volumes. In the second part of the paper we prove that any SPSD matrix admits a cross approximation built on a principal submatrix whose approximation error is bounded by $$(r+1)$$ ( r + 1 ) times the error of the best rank r approximation in the nuclear norm. In the spirit of recent work by Cortinovis and Kressner we derive some deterministic algorithms, which are capable to retrieve a quasi optimal cross approximation with cost $$\mathcal O(n^3)$$ O ( n 3 ) .

scholarly journals Revisiting Modified Greedy Algorithm for Monotone Submodular Maximization with a Knapsack Constraint

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Jing Tang ◽  
Xueyan Tang ◽  
Andrew Lim ◽  
Kai Han ◽  
Chongshou Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Approximation Algorithms ◽  
Greedy Algorithm ◽  
Branch And Bound ◽  
Upper Bound ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Approximation Factor ◽  
Real World Application ◽  
Efficiency Of Algorithms ◽  
Knapsack Constraint ◽  
Submodular Maximization

Monotone submodular maximization with a knapsack constraint is NP-hard. Various approximation algorithms have been devised to address this optimization problem. In this paper, we revisit the widely known modified greedy algorithm. First, we show that this algorithm can achieve an approximation factor of 0.405, which significantly improves the known factors of 0.357 given by Wolsey and (1-1/e)/2\approx 0.316 given by Khuller et al. More importantly, our analysis closes a gap in Khuller et al.'s proof for the extensively mentioned approximation factor of (1-1/\sqrte )\approx 0.393 in the literature to clarify a long-standing misconception on this issue. Second, we enhance the modified greedy algorithm to derive a data-dependent upper bound on the optimum. We empirically demonstrate the tightness of our upper bound with a real-world application. The bound enables us to obtain a data-dependent ratio typically much higher than 0.405 between the solution value of the modified greedy algorithm and the optimum. It can also be used to significantly improve the efficiency of algorithms such as branch and bound.

scholarly journals Gaussian variant of Freivalds’ algorithm for efficient and reliable matrix product verification

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-284
Author(s):  
Hao Ji ◽  
Michael Mascagni ◽  
Yaohang Li
Keyword(s):  
False Positive ◽  
Measure Zero ◽  
Matrix Multiplication ◽  
Numerical Linear Algebra ◽  
Floating Point ◽  
Matrix Product ◽  
Computing Environment ◽  
Deterministic Algorithms ◽  
Product Verification ◽  
Point Arithmetic

AbstractIn this article, we consider the general problem of checking the correctness of matrix multiplication. Given three n\times n matrices 𝐴, 𝐵 and 𝐶, the goal is to verify that A\times B=C without carrying out the computationally costly operations of matrix multiplication and comparing the product A\times B with 𝐶, term by term. This is especially important when some or all of these matrices are very large, and when the computing environment is prone to soft errors. Here we extend Freivalds’ algorithm to a Gaussian Variant of Freivalds’ Algorithm (GVFA) by projecting the product A\times B as well as 𝐶 onto a Gaussian random vector and then comparing the resulting vectors. The computational complexity of GVFA is consistent with that of Freivalds’ algorithm, which is O(n^{2}). However, unlike Freivalds’ algorithm, whose probability of a false positive is 2^{-k}, where 𝑘 is the number of iterations, our theoretical analysis shows that, when A\times B\neq C, GVFA produces a false positive on set of inputs of measure zero with exact arithmetic. When we introduce round-off error and floating-point arithmetic into our analysis, we can show that the larger this error, the higher the probability that GVFA avoids false positives. Moreover, by iterating GVFA 𝑘 times, the probability of a false positive decreases as p^{k}, where 𝑝 is a very small value depending on the nature of the fault on the result matrix and the arithmetic system’s floating-point precision. Unlike deterministic algorithms, there do not exist any fault patterns that are completely undetectable with GVFA. Thus GVFA can be used to provide efficient fault tolerance in numerical linear algebra, and it can be efficiently implemented on modern computing architectures. In particular, GVFA can be very efficiently implemented on architectures with hardware support for fused multiply-add operations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document