Intrinsic and extrinsic sources of variation in the dynamics of large herbivore populations
We evaluated the relative importance of intrinsic (density-dependent) and extrinsic (density-independent) sources of resource variability in the dynamics of bighorn sheep ( Ovis canadensis Shaw, 1804) populations in southwestern USA. We tested the hypothesis that populations experiencing greater variation in forage availability are less likely to be at equilibrium density with forage supplies, and thus, would demonstrate weaker evidence of intraspecific competition. We used regression to relate population growth rate to rainfall (forage conditions) and to abundance (intraspecific competition) for 20 sheep populations, and we estimated the strength of the effects of density and rainfall for each population. Then we compared among populations to look for relationships between the strengths of rainfall and density effects and the variability in rainfall experienced by each population. Populations demonstrating a density effect were associated with environments having lower variability than those that did not. Populations showing a rainfall effect were associated with environments having a variability higher than those that lacked a rainfall effect. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that populations experiencing higher variation in forage resources are less likely to achieve an equilibrium density with forage supplies where intraspecific competition would be a large determinant to the dynamics of that population.