Interaction of interferon with cells: the relationship of cell-associated interferon and antiviral activity

1970 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 1303-1310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward T. Sheaff ◽  
Robert B. Stewart

Studies of the effect of interferon on the growth of Sindbis virus in cultures of chick embryo cells have shown that interferon is taken up by cells and that such uptake must occur before antiviral activity is observed. Evidence is presented here that the quantitative expression of antiviral activity is dependent on the amount of interferon that becomes cell associated.

1976 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-354
Author(s):  
Y. Umino ◽  
S. Kohno ◽  
S. Saito

1969 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 605-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert B. Stewart ◽  
Edward T. Sheaff

A study of the effect of interferon on the growth of Sindbis virus in cultures of chick-embryo cells has shown that interferon forms an association with cells (uptake) and that the action of interferon is concentration rather than amount dependent. Evidence has also been obtained that interferon acts to reduce the yield of virus from cells, but does not reduce the number of cells synthesizing virus (all or none effect).


1967 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1454-1459 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Delphia ◽  
Shamer Singh ◽  
Harold Baskin

1967 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 1421-1425
Author(s):  
Robert B. Stewart ◽  
Sunidhkumar S. Gandhi

Repeated assays of standard preparations of interferon carried out for over a year using primary cultures of chick-embryo cells and Sindbis virus in an assay system showed that cell cultures varied in their sensitivity to interferon. This altered sensitivity was not due to a change in the challenge virus nor to the time of exposure of cells to interferon. An analysis of the data showed that the slope of the dose–response curves remained constant although they could be displaced, indicating changes in sensitivity. Information was also obtained demonstrating that sensitivity of cells to interferon could vary within a single assay.


Author(s):  
Juan Samuel Sulca Herencia

Dengue is the most important arbovirus, many research have contributed to the diagnosis, management, prevention and control of this disease, which will be described in this chapter, for example: the importance of serotypes and genotypes for the development of the disease, the relationship of the viral load between symptomatic and asymptomatic people, the influence of antibodies on the development of the disease, co-infections with microorganisms and chronic diseases, possible reservoirs, the diagnostic assays, cross-reactions in the diagnosis, the influence of climate change on the disease and the vector, mechanisms of transmission of the disease, new drugs and plant extracts with antiviral activity, the dengue vaccine, the results of immunizations, etc. This information gives a concrete idea of the advances and challenges against this disease.


Paleobiology ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 6 (02) ◽  
pp. 146-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Oliver

The Mesozoic-Cenozoic coral Order Scleractinia has been suggested to have originated or evolved (1) by direct descent from the Paleozoic Order Rugosa or (2) by the development of a skeleton in members of one of the anemone groups that probably have existed throughout Phanerozoic time. In spite of much work on the subject, advocates of the direct descent hypothesis have failed to find convincing evidence of this relationship. Critical points are:(1) Rugosan septal insertion is serial; Scleractinian insertion is cyclic; no intermediate stages have been demonstrated. Apparent intermediates are Scleractinia having bilateral cyclic insertion or teratological Rugosa.(2) There is convincing evidence that the skeletons of many Rugosa were calcitic and none are known to be or to have been aragonitic. In contrast, the skeletons of all living Scleractinia are aragonitic and there is evidence that fossil Scleractinia were aragonitic also. The mineralogic difference is almost certainly due to intrinsic biologic factors.(3) No early Triassic corals of either group are known. This fact is not compelling (by itself) but is important in connection with points 1 and 2, because, given direct descent, both changes took place during this only stage in the history of the two groups in which there are no known corals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document