Temporal Summation for Critical Bandwidth Signals

1967 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 456-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry L. Northern
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Summation ◽  
Critical Bandwidth

Temporal Summation is Independent of Frequency in the Pacinian (P) Tactile Channel

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Z. Yildiz ◽  
Murat Ozsaltik ◽  
Burak Guclu
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Summation

Temporal summation and backward masking

1963 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. N. Wright ◽  
Jozef J. Zwislocki
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Summation ◽  
Backward Masking

Gender Differences in Heat Pain and Temporal Summation Threshold in Normal Volunteers

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Joon Ho Lee ◽  
Jae Hwa Yoo ◽  
Sung Hwan Cho ◽  
Yong Ik Kim
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Temporal Summation ◽  
Heat Pain ◽  
Normal Volunteers

scholarly journals MONOSYNAPTIC REFLEX RESPONSE OF INDIVIDUAL MOTONEURONS AS A FUNCTION OF FREQUENCY

1957 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. C. Lloyd
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Temporal Summation ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Stimulation Frequency ◽  
Monosynaptic Reflex ◽  
Reflex Response ◽  
High Frequency Stimulation ◽  
Low Frequency Stimulation ◽  
Frequency Stimulation ◽  
Frequency Of Stimulation

An assemblage of individual motoneurons constituting a synthetic motoneuron pool has been studied from the standpoint of relating monosynaptic reflex responses to frequency of afferent stimulation. Intensity of low frequency depression is not a simple function of transmitter potentiality. As frequency of stimulation increases from 3 per minute to 10 per second, low frequency depression increases in magnitude. Between 10 and approximately 60 per second low frequency depression apparently diminishes and subnormality becomes a factor in causing depression. At frequencies above 60 per second temporal summation occurs, but subnormality limits the degree of response attainable by summation. At low stimulation frequencies rhythm is determined by stimulation frequency. Interruptions of rhythmic firing depend solely upon temporal fluctuation of excitability. At high frequency of stimulation rhythm is determined by subnormality rather than inherent rhythmicity, and excitability fluctuation leads to instability of response rhythm. In short, whatever the stimulation frequency, random excitability fluctuation is the factor disrupting rhythmic response. Monosynaptic reflex response latency is stable during high frequency stimulation as it is in low frequency stimulation provided a significant extrinsic source of random bombardment is not present. In the presence of powerful random bombardment discharge may become random with respect to monosynaptic afferent excitation provided the latter is feeble. When this occurs it does so equally at low frequency and high frequency. Thus temporal summation is not a necessary factor. There is, then, no remaining evidence to suggest that the agency for temporal summation in the monosynaptic system becomes a transmitting agency in its own right.

Temporal summation properties of the olfactory projection neurons in the moth antennal lobe revealed by optogenetic stimulation

2011 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. e79
Author(s):  
Masashi Tabuchi ◽  
Takeshi Sakurai ◽  
Hidefumi Mitsuno ◽  
Shigehiro Namiki ◽  
Ryo Minegishi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antennal Lobe ◽  
Temporal Summation ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Optogenetic Stimulation

Using multilevel growth curve modeling to examine emotional modulation of temporal summation of pain (TS-pain) and the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR)

Pain ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 153 (11) ◽  
pp. 2274-2282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie L. Rhudy ◽  
Satin L. Martin ◽  
Ellen L. Terry ◽  
Jennifer L. DelVentura ◽  
Kara L. Kerr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Curve ◽  
Temporal Summation ◽  
Growth Curve Modeling ◽  
Emotional Modulation ◽  
Flexion Reflex ◽  
Nociceptive Flexion Reflex ◽  
Curve Modeling
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document