6 kHz MOPA light source for 193 nm immersion lithography

Author(s):  
Walter D. Gillespie ◽  
Toshihiko Ishihara ◽  
William N. Partlo ◽  
George X. Ferguson ◽  
Michael R. Simon
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Idriss Blakey ◽  
Lan Chen ◽  
Bronwin Dargaville ◽  
Heping Liu ◽  
Andrew Whittaker ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Fleurov ◽  
Slava Rokitski ◽  
Robert Bergstedt ◽  
Hong Ye ◽  
Kevin O’Brien ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gyo Wun Kim ◽  
Won Jun Chang ◽  
Ji Eun Kang ◽  
Hee Ju Kim ◽  
Geun Young Yeom

Abstract Even though EUV lithography has the advantage of implenting a finer pattern compared to ArF immersion lithography due to the use of 13.5 nm instead of 193 nm as the wavelengh of the light source, due to the low energy of EUV light source, EUV resist has a thinner thickness than conventional ArF resist. EUV resist having such a thin thickness is more vulnerable to radiation damage received during the etching because of its low etch resistance and also tends to have a problem of low etch selectivity. In this study, the radiation damage to EUV resist during etching of hardmask materials such as Si3N4, SiO2, etc. using CF4 gas was compared between neutral beam etching (NBE) and ion beam etching (IBE). When NBE was used, after the etching of 20 nm thick EUV resist, the line edge roughness (LER) increase and the critical dimension (CD) change of EUV resist were reduced by ~ 1/3 and ~ 1/2, respectively, compared to those by IBE. Also, at that EUV etch depth, the RMS(root mean square) surface roughness value of EUV resist etched by NBE was ~2/3 compared to that by IBE on the average. It was also confirmed that the etching selectivity between SiO2, Si3N4, etc. and EUV resist was higher for NBE compared to IBE. The less damage to the EUV resist and the higher etch selectivity of materials such as Si3N4 and SiO2 over EUV resist for NBE compared to IBE are believed to be related to the no potential energy released by the neutralization of the ions during the etching for NBE.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Christopher Taylor ◽  
Charles R. Chambers ◽  
Ryan Deschner ◽  
Robert J. LeSuer ◽  
Willard E. Conley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 219 ◽  
pp. 209-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucile Broussous ◽  
D. Krejcirova ◽  
K. Courouble ◽  
S. Zoll ◽  
A. Iwasaki ◽  
...  

Titanium Nitride metal hard mask was first introduced for BEOL patterning at 65 nm [1] and 45 nm nodes [2]. Indeed, in this “Trench First Hard Mask” (TFHM) backend architecture, the dual hard mask stack (SiO2 & TiN) allows a minimized exposure of ULK materials to damaging plasma chemistries, both for line/via etch sequence, and lithography reworks operations. This integration scheme was successfully used for a BEOL pitch down to 90 nm for the 28 nm node, however, for the 14 nm technology node, 64 nm BEOL minimum pitch is required for the first metal levels. Because it is unable to resolve features below 80 nm pitch in a single exposure, conventional 193 nm immersion lithography must be associated with dual patterning schemes, so called Lithography-Etch-Lithography-Etch (LELE) patterning [3] for line levels and self-aligned via (SAV) process [4] for via patterning. In both cases, 2 lithography/etch/clean sequences are necessary to obtain one desired pattern, and associated reworks also become more challenging since first pattern is exposed to resist removal processes (plasma + wet clean). The reference wet cleans that were developed for 65 to 28 nm TiN hardmask patterning, utilizes commonly used chemistry for BEOL post-etch cleans, i.e. diluted hydrofluoric acid (dHF) followed by deionized water Nanospray (DIWNS) on 300 mm single wafer tool.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph R. Dammel ◽  
Georg Pawlowski ◽  
Andrew Romano ◽  
Frank M. Houlihan ◽  
Woo-Kyu Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Xiaoshi Zhang ◽  
Hsia-Hua Liu ◽  
Dirk Muller ◽  
Sterling Backus

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuya Matsumoto ◽  
Elizabeth Costner ◽  
Isao Nishimura ◽  
Mitsuru Ueda ◽  
C. Grant Willson

2010 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 321-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P. Sanders
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Merriam ◽  
Donald S. Bethune ◽  
John A. Hoffnagle ◽  
William D. Hinsberg ◽  
C. Michael Jefferson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document