Transient FEM calculation of the spatial heat distribution in hard dental tissue during and after IR laser ablation

Author(s):  
Guenter Uhrig ◽  
Dirk H. Meyer ◽  
Hans-Jochen Foth
1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ladislav Grad ◽  
Janez I. Mozina ◽  
Dusan Sustercic ◽  
Nenad Funduk ◽  
Uros Skaleric ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Perhavec ◽  
A. Gorkič ◽  
D. Bračun ◽  
J. Diaci

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Majaron ◽  
Matjaz Lukac ◽  
Dusan Sustercic ◽  
Nenad Funduk ◽  
Uros Skaleric

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matjaz Lukac ◽  
Ladislav Grad ◽  
Janez I. Mozina ◽  
Dusan Sustercic ◽  
Nenad Funduk ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 100266
Author(s):  
Pavel Seredin ◽  
Dmitry Goloshchapov ◽  
Vladimir Kashkarov ◽  
YuYu Khudyakov ◽  
Ivan Ippolitov ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 162 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanja Tanaskovic-Stankovic ◽  
Irena Tanaskovic ◽  
Nemanja Jovicic ◽  
Marina Miletic-Kovacevic ◽  
Tatjana Kanjevac ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lado Davidovic ◽  
Slavoljub Tomic ◽  
Mihael Stanojevic ◽  
Slavoljub Zivkovic

Introduction. A lack of appropriate adhesiveness is one of the biggest problems in the restorative dentistry today and the main cause of the microleakage between restorations and hard dental tissue. The aim of this study was to assess the adhesiveness of two different glass ionomer cement restorations class V on the hard dental tissue using the SEM analysis and dye penetration test. Material and methods. The study included 80 extracted teeth for orthodontic reasons (premolars and molars) in both genders and different age. On the vestibular and oral side of the teeth, adhesive preparations class V were done (size 3?2?2 mm). On the vestibular preparation, GC Fuji II was applicated and GC Fuji II LC-improved on the oral side. The quality of the adhesiveness between restorations and hard dental tissue was evaluated using the SEM analysis and dye penetration test (0.5% basic fuxsin). Linear penetration of the dye was observed using 10 times magnification. Results. The results showed that microleakage was presented with both materials but a ratio was less with Fuji II LC compared with Fuji II. Also, the microleakage was less on the occlusal parts of the restorations than on the gingival, with both materials. Microleakage was noticed in 93.44% teeth with Fuji II GJC restorations with index of microleakage of 148 on all edges. Fuji II LC GJC restorations showed microleakage in 68.4% teeth with index of microleakage 75 on all edges. The SEM analysis showed that both glass ionomer materials had better adhesiveness to the enamel than to the dentin. The average gap length between Fuji II LC and dentin was 9 ?m and Fuji II 17 ?m, respectively. Conclusion. Better adhesiveness to the hard dental tissue was achieved with materials of the newer generations, resin modificated glas ionomer cements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document