Use of Geometric In-Line Inspection (ILI) Intelligence Tools With the Inertial Module for Diagnosis and Management of Structural Integrity in Pipelines With Geohazards: Case Study

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Freddy Hernández Sánchez ◽  
Carlos Antonio Vergara ◽  
Carlos Hidalgo
Keyword(s):  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Geographical Area ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Ground Movement ◽  
The Andes ◽  
Geological Diversity ◽  
Integrity Management ◽  
Unstable Slope ◽  
Intelligent Tools

Colombia is a country located in a geographical area with great geological diversity, where every day the effects of climate change increases the probability of the failure of buried pipelines due to the movement of land or the instability associated with them. That is why the use of geometric In Line Inspection (ILI) intelligent tools with the inertial module is important for the diagnosis of structural integrity of pipelines and is associated with an integrity management program due to the geotechnical threats present throughout its path. It decreases maintenance costs due to pump stoppage for unscheduled repairs, anticipating the solution, and mitigating and controlling deformations in the pipeline caused by geotechnical ground displacements. OCENSA-Pipeline Central SA (Colombia) has developed, through its experience, a program to manage integrity by determining the structural expense in specific sections due to displacement of the pipeline caused by ground movement through the use of the Geometric ILI tools and MFL inertial module. This paper specifically presents the use of the tool in decision-making based on OCENSA’s preset study limits for deformations in the elastic range and plastic building material of the pipeline. In 1997 OCENSA was among the first companies in Latin America to use Inertial Geo-positioning technology; today there are sectors which have been inspected with this technology as many as five times, in which pipe displacement of up to 5 meters has been found. The case study presented refers to a geographical point on the route of the pipeline located in the Andes, at the site of the movement known as the “La negra” ravine, near the town of Puente Nacional, where movements of the pipeline associated with geotechnically unstable slope conditions were detected by In line inspection (ILI) Geometric and inertial modules, beginning in 2004. Since that time, integrity management was conducted in order to reduce the chances pipeline failure will materialize in this area of geotechnical instability.

Integrity Management of Ground Movement Hazards

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Yi Wang ◽  
Don West ◽  
Douglas Dewar ◽  
Alex McKenzie-Johnson ◽  
Millan Sen
Keyword(s):  
Management Program ◽  
Ground Movement ◽  
Tensile Failure ◽  
Weld Strength ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Ground Movements ◽  
Decision Points ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Integrity Management ◽  
Girth Welds

Ground movements, such as landslides and subsidence/settlement, can pose serious threats to pipeline integrity. The consequence of these incidents can be severe. In the absence of systematic integrity management, preventing and predicting incidents related to ground movements can be difficult. A ground movement management program can reduce the potential of those incidents. Some basic concepts and terms relevant to the management of ground movement hazards are introduced first. A ground movement management program may involve a long segment of a pipeline that may have a threat of failure in unknown locations. Identifying such locations and understanding the potential magnitude of the ground movement is often the starting point of a management program. In other cases, management activities may start after an event is known to have occurred. A sample response process is shown to illustrate key considerations and decision points after the evidence of an event is discovered. Such a process can involve fitness-for-service (FFS) assessment when appropriate information is available. The framework and key elements of FFS assessment are explained, including safety factors on strain capacity. The use of FFS assessment is illustrated through the assessment of tensile failure mode. Assessment models are introduced, including key factors affecting the outcome of an assessment. The unique features of girth welds in vintage pipelines are highlighted because the management of such pipelines is a high priority in North America and perhaps in other parts of the worlds. Common practice and appropriate considerations in a pipeline replacement program in areas of potential ground movement are highlighted. It is advisable to replace pipes with pipes of similar strength and stiffness so the strains can be distributed as broadly as possible. The chemical composition of pipe steels and the mechanical properties of the pipes should be such that the possibility of HAZ softening and weld strength undermatching is minimized. In addition, the benefits and cost of using the workmanship flaw acceptance criteria of API 1104 or equivalent standards in making repair and cutout decisions of vintage pipelines should be evaluated against the possible use of FFS assessment procedures. FFS assessment provides a quantifiable performance target which is not available through the workmanship criteria. However, necessary inputs to perform FFS assessment may not be readily available. Ongoing work intended to address some of the gaps is briefly described.

Testing of Acoustic Emission Technology to Detect Cracks and Corrosion in the Marine Environment

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (02) ◽  
pp. 106-110
Author(s):  
Ge Wang ◽  
Michael Lee ◽  
Chris Serratella ◽  
Stanley Botten ◽  
Sam Ternowchek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acoustic Emission ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Pipeline System ◽  
Inspection Planning ◽  
Structural Degradation ◽  
Integrity Management ◽  
Acoustic Emission Technology

Real-time monitoring and detection of structural degradation helps in capturing the structural conditions of ships. The latest nondestructive testing (NDT) and sensor technologies will potentially be integrated into future generations of the structural integrity management program. This paper reports on a joint development project between Alaska Tanker Company, American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), and MISTRAS. The pilot project examined the viability of acoustic emission technology as a screening tool for surveys and inspection planning. Specifically, testing took place on a 32-year-old double-hull Trans Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) trade tanker. The test demonstrated the possibility of adapting this technology in the identification of critical spots on a tanker in order to target inspections. This targeting will focus surveys and inspections on suspected areas, thus increasing efficiency of detecting structural degradation. The test has the potential to introduce new inspection procedures as the project undertakes the first commercial testing of the latest acoustic emission technology during a tanker's voyage.

Integrity Management Program for Geo-Hazards in the OCENSA Pipeline System

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo García ◽  
Carlos Nieves ◽  
Juan Diego Colonia
Keyword(s):  
Management Program ◽  
Andes Mountains ◽  
Pipeline System ◽  
The Andes ◽  
Oil Pipelines ◽  
Differential Settling ◽  
The Face ◽  
Integrity Management ◽  
The Caribbean ◽  
Geological Formations

Oil pipelines systems for hydrocarbons transportation are linear projects that can reach great lengths. For this reason, theirs paths may cross different geological formations, soil types, navigable or torrential waters; and they may face geotechnical and hydrological instability problems such as creeping slopes, geological faults, landslides, scour and differential settling which causes different relative movements between the soil and the pipeline. The OCENSA (Oleoducto Central S.A) 30″ and 36″ diameter system was built in 1997 to transport crude oil from the eastern foothills of the Andes to the Caribbean Coast along some 830 km of the Eastern Andes mountains range and the spurs of the central Andes mountains range of Colombia: it was a major challenge to secure the integrity of the pipeline in the face of natural events.

Satellite-Based Monitoring of Subsidence Ground Movement Impacting Pipeline Integrity

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Youden ◽  
Desmond Power ◽  
Ping Han ◽  
Jerry English ◽  
Rick Gailing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Management Program ◽  
Ground Movement ◽  
Ground Subsidence ◽  
Ground Movements ◽  
Gps Survey ◽  
Management Technology ◽  
Integrity Management ◽  
Survey Results ◽  
Sar Data ◽  
Technology Institute

Ground movements due to a range of governing mechanisms are recognized to pose hazards to the operating integrity of pipelines in California. As part of an extensive technology management program, Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) is involved in the development and implementation of satellite-based monitoring of subsidence ground movements impacting pipeline integrity. By both hosting a Gas Technology Institute (GTI) and Pipeline Research Council International (PRCI) study and undertaking an internal study, SoCalGas is supporting the investigation of two aspects of this promising pipeline integrity management technology. The current project of monitoring ground subsidence due to oil production in the San Joaquin Valley utilizes synthetic aperture radar (SAR) to derive sub-centimeter ground movement measurements from February to September, 2001. The estimates of the subsidence derived from the SAR data are compared with GPS survey results taken at 65 monuments. In addition, archived SAR data from 1992 to 2000 are used to better estimate the movement that has occurred there over the past decade.

Case Study of “TIEAMM” Approach to Geohazard Identification, Characterization, and Mitigation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Nasrallah ◽  
Bailey Theriault ◽  
Andreas Kammereck
Keyword(s):  
Management Program ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Subject Matter Experts ◽  
Construction Work ◽  
Differential Movement ◽  
Integrity Management ◽  
Mitigation Design ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ongoing Monitoring

Abstract This study presents the implementation of a multidisciplinary team approach to geohazard identification, characterization, assessment, and mitigation \, that includes landslide subject matter experts (SMEs) in geotechnical and hydrotechnical engineering and geology and pipeline stress analysis with the pipeline owner/operator (Owner). This approach provided targeted and programmatic geohazard training, identification, exploration, assessment, mitigation, and monitoring, and hase been coin as the “TIEAMM” approach. The Owner worked with the geohazard SMEs to develop a system-wide geohazard pipeline integrity management program, including a phased geohazard assessment along the right-of-way, office and field-based training for the local operations staff, risk-based design mitigation approaches, on-site construction support, and continued monitoring. The landslide discussed in this study is used as an example to demonstrate the TIEAMM approach; this site was identified by local operations staff, documenting differential movement of approximately 15 feet between November 2018 and February 2019. A more detailed geological exploration and assessment as well as a pipeline strain assessment was completed. The work allowed for mitigation efforts and corresponding costs to be optimized. The mitigation design was flexible to address ongoing monitoring, and then field-fit to address site conditions observed during the construction work. The approach to geohazard management completed for this site provided the data and information needed to make informed decisions to support targeted optimization for the scope and scale of mitigation work, and thereby avoided over-conservative (and thereby overly-costly) mitigation efforts.

Total Pipeline Integrity Management System Implemented for KOC Pipelines: A Case Study

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Robb Isaac ◽  
Saleh Al-Sulaiman ◽  
Monty R. Martin ◽  
Sandeep Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Management System ◽  
Significant Loss ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Pipeline System ◽  
Transit System ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Integrity Management

In early 2005, Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) initiated a Total Pipeline Integrity Management System (TPIMS) implementation in order to carry out a major integrity assessment of its operating facilities, equipment, buried plant piping and pipeline network and to establish a continuing integrity management program. KOC Transit System is a complex infrastructure consisting of over three hundred pipelines, thousands of wellhead flow lines, and consumer and offshore lines for which there was a significant loss of data when the facilities were destroyed during a military invasion in 1990. An initial pipeline system assessment identified issues and actions regarding condition of the pipelines, corridors, requirements on in-line inspection (ILI), documentation, RISK assessment, status of international code compliance, and overall state of the system. Following recommendations from that initial assessment led to the development of a long term strategy; the execution of which required the implementation of a comprehensive integrity management program. This case study discusses the results obtained after five years of implementation of TPIMS at KOC. It will demonstrate some of the complex components involved in managing the integrity of the Transit System that have been made possible through the implementation of the system. The general concept and structure of TPIMS will be described, and how it deals with the complexity of the KOC pipeline system. The system made it possible to integrate and manage data from various sources, by conducting integrity assessment using ILI, Direct Assessment and hydrostatic testing, as well as structure a comprehensive RISK & Decision Support mechanism. This is one of the world’s first implementations of this magnitude which encompasses such a wide range of services and variables; all being managed in a single environment and utilized by a multitude of users in different areas at KOC. The biggest challenge in a project of this scope is data management. Examples will be shown of the integration structure to illustrate the benefits of using a single comprehensive and versatile platform to manage system requirements; ultimately providing system reliability and improving overall operational efficiency.

The Role of Effective Collaboration in the Advancement of EMAT Inline Inspection Technology for Pipeline Integrity Management: A Case Study

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Sutherland ◽  
Stephan Tappert ◽  
Richard Kania ◽  
Karlheinz Kashammer ◽  
Jim Marr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
The Past ◽  
Ongoing Work ◽  
Integrity Management ◽  
Effective Collaboration ◽  
Major Pipeline

Over the past three years there has been increasing industry interest and profile regarding the role and pipeline integrity management potential of EMAT crack inspection technology in the Oil & Gas pipeline industry. This paper outlines the stages and results of the effective collaboration of a major pipeline operator and a service company to advance the true predictive performance of the EMATScan Gen III crack inspection technology. The paper will also summarize and provide examples of lessons-learned from this collaboration across all stages of EMAT based SCC integrity management program. The paper will similarly outline ongoing work in progress regarding the assessment of the ILI data relative to hydro-testing equivalency, detection of injurious defects and the related analysis and reporting improvements made over the past three years.

Asset Integrity Assessment and Management Program for Life Preservation of a Purpose Built FPSO and Associated Subsea System Facilities

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abe Nezamian ◽  
Robert J. Nicolson
Keyword(s):  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Original Design ◽  
Safety Level ◽  
Maintenance And Repair ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Operational Life ◽  
Integrity Management ◽  
Maintenance And Inspection

Floating facilities for production, storage and offtake (FPSO) and other offshore production facilities have been used safely and reliably throughout the oil industry for many years. Asset Integrity is increasingly important to optimising safety and operational life and asset performance efficiency. Operators need to comply with Corporate, Regulatory and Certification requirements but recognise that developing and managing an effective and compliant Asset Integrity Management System is both time consuming and costly. Review of operational history of existing large FPSOs around the world indicated low confidence in operational life expectancy and to achieve the design life without possible dry docking or major repair. FPSOs have certain loading characteristics and damage consequences that make them different to other offshore installations and conventional ships, and often more challenging to maintain and operate. Maintenance and inspection campaigns are important inputs in the Asset Integrity Management (AIM) system of FPSOs and other floating offshore facilities. Considering that the unit shall stay on site during the whole life of the field, where disconnection or the removal of the mooring system is not planned, a comprehensive methodology for the asset integrity management, survey, inspection, testing, maintenance and repair of the unit during this period needs to be developed and subject to review based on the results of the scheduled inspections and audits. So as well as class and statutory requirements, inspection and survey, maintenance and repair plans should reflect the required availability, functionality, survivability and durability of the unit, giving due regard to its field life, as part of the safety management of the facility. Risk Based Integrity management methodology has been adopted in several projects and is an important tool to establish a rational inspection campaign for structural components, mainly for those located in areas where access is critical and operational constraints are an important parameter. This paper gives an overview of the challenges and discusses various aspects of ageing related to FPSO facilities, represented risk to the integrity of a facility and the required procedures and reassessment criteria for maintaining the structural integrity. This paper also provides an overall view on the regulatory requirements, documentation and calibrations/validations of the original design values to maintain the safety level by means of a maintenance and inspection programs balancing the ageing mechanisms and improving the reliability of assessment results. A brief summary of an example project of an asset integrity assessment and management program for life preservation of a purpose built FPSO and associated subsea system facilities is presented.

Remaining Life Assessment of ERW Flaws: A Case Study

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Cazenave ◽  
Samarth Tandon ◽  
Katina Tinacos ◽  
Ming Gao ◽  
David C. Katz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Frequency ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
Seam Weld ◽  
Natural Gas Pipelines ◽  
Integrity Management ◽  
Remaining Life Assessment ◽  
Welded Pipe ◽  
Weld Area

Recent failures in seam weld pipe have raised concerns within the pipeline industry over the integrity of such welded pipe. Low-Frequency (LF) Electric Resistance Welded (ERW) pipe manufactured prior to 1970, in particular, can be susceptible to failures caused by hook cracks, lack of fusion and other planar defects should the weld area exhibit low toughness. Integrity management regulations and Pipeline operators are evaluating potential methodologies to address and mitigate the LF-ERW seam weld threat. A program has been initiated at Williams Northwest Pipeline GP (NWPGP) to address the integrity management of its pre-70s ERW pipelines. In this case study, as part of an overall integrity management program, a hydrostatic test and fatigue analysis based methodology for addressing the LF-ERW seam weld threat is presented. The methodology was applied to 15 pre-1970’s natural gas pipelines. The results and findings are summarized in terms of the integrity threat mitigation and maintenance strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document