Waste Heat Recovery for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines: A Review of Mechanical Turbocompounding

Author(s):  
Hannu Jääskeläinen ◽  
W. Addy Majewski

Heat rejected with the exhaust gas, EGR, engine coolant and other engine components is a major source of efficiency loss in internal combustion engines. One important technology to recover some of this “wasted” heat is turbocompounding. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that turbocompounding provides a 1.8% efficiency improvement, is already a commercial technology and a penetration rate of 10% is estimated by 2027. Line haul sleeper cab applications are the most likely to see the highest market penetration rates. This paper presents an overview of mechanical turbocompounding for heavy-duty truck engines. For these applications, series turbocompounding is the most suitable configuration and a number of applications have used it since the early 1990s. Unlike other WHR technologies, turbocompounding interacts significantly with the engine through a higher exhaust backpressure. EGR makes it more challenging to realize an efficiency benefit from turbocompounding. It also makes emission control using aftertreatment technology more challenging due to a lower exhaust temperature.

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Yamaguchi ◽  
Yuzo Aoyagi ◽  
Noboru Uchida ◽  
Akira Fukunaga ◽  
Masayuki Kobayashi ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Dollmeyer ◽  
David A. Vittorio ◽  
Thomas A. Grana ◽  
James R. Katzenmeyer ◽  
Stephen J. Charlton ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Ram Vijayagopal ◽  
Aymeric Rousseau

The benefits of electrified powertrains for light-duty vehicles are well understood, however sufficient published information is not available on the benefits of advanced powertrains on the various types of medium and heavy duty vehicles. Quantifying the benefits of powertrain electrification will help fleet operators understand the advantages or limitations in adopting electrified powertrains in their truck fleets. Trucks vary in size and shape, as they are designed for specific applications. It is necessary to model each kind of truck separately to understand what kind of powertrain architecture will be feasible for their daily operations. This paper examines 11 types of vehicles and 5 powertrain technology choices to quantify the fuel saving potential of each design choice. This study uses the regulatory cycles proposed by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for measuring fuel consumption.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document