Modeling Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid as an Elastic Rod Inlaid With Fibrils

2014 ◽  
Vol 81 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Chen ◽  
Chenling Dong

A classical view of the double-stranded deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) as an isotropic elastic rod fails to explain its high flexibility manifested in the formation of sharp loops that are essential in gene regulation and DNA storage. Since the basic structure of DNA can be divided into the external highly polar backbone and the internal hydrophobic bases, here we model DNA as an elastic rod inlaid with fibrils. If the fibrils are much stiffer than the rod, we find that the persistence length of short DNA can be much smaller than that of long DNA with an adapted shear lag analysis. Consequently, the cyclization rate for short DNA is found to be much higher than the previous prediction of the worm-like chain model, which is interestingly in consistency with experiments. Our analysis suggests that the bending of short DNAs can be facilitated if there exists a specific structural heterogeneity.

2002 ◽  
Vol 117 (9) ◽  
pp. 4578-4584 ◽  
Author(s):  
HouYu Zhang ◽  
Xin-Qi Li ◽  
Ping Han ◽  
Xiang Yang Yu ◽  
YiJing Yan

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
SumaYekappa Hottigoudar ◽  
Harsha Pratap ◽  
KuberaSiddappa Nichanahalli ◽  
Parkash Chand

2014 ◽  
Vol 421 ◽  
pp. 270-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mouayed A. Hussein ◽  
Teoh S. Guan ◽  
Rosenani A. Haque ◽  
Mohamed B. Khadeer Ahamed ◽  
Amin M.S. Abdul Majid

2013 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-88
Author(s):  
Edmund Thomas

Sixty years ago, on 25 April 1953, probably the most influential scientific article of the twentieth century appeared. Its uninviting title, ‘Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid’, concealed the revolutionary discovery by the molecular biologists James Watson and Francis Crick of the structure of what became known as ‘the molecule of life’. The ‘radically different structure’ that they proposed for the salt of deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) had ‘two helical chains each coiled round the same axis’. ‘Both chains’, they wrote, ‘follow right-handed helices, but owing to the dyad the sequences of the atoms in the two chains run in opposite directions.’ When Bruno J. Strasser asked in the same journal fifty years later ‘Who cares about the double helix?’, he answered that it marked ‘an age of (lost) innocence, when youth, intelligence and self-assurance were sufficient to make great discoveries in science’.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document