Drag Coefficient and Two-Phase Friction Multiplier on Tube Bundles Subjected to Two-Phase Cross-Flow

2012 ◽  
Vol 135 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
W. G. Sim ◽  
Njuki W. Mureithi
Keyword(s):  
Drag Coefficient ◽  
Void Fraction ◽  
Euler Number ◽  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Water Mixture ◽  
Duct Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Mass Fluxes ◽  
Wide Range

An approximate analytical model, to predict the drag coefficient on a cylinder and the two-phase Euler number for upward two-phase cross-flow through horizontal bundles, has been developed. To verify the model, two sets of experiments were performed with an air–water mixture for a range of pitch mass fluxes and void fractions. The experiments were undertaken using a rotated triangular (RT) array of cylinders having a pitch-to-diameter ratio of 1.5 and cylinder diameter 38 mm. The void fraction model proposed by Feenstra et al. was used to estimate the void fraction of the flow within the tube bundle. An important variable for drag coefficient estimation is the two-phase friction multiplier. A new drag coefficient model has been developed, based on the single-phase flow Euler number formulation proposed by Zukauskas et al. and the two-phase friction multiplier in duct flow formulated by various researchers. The present model is developed considering the Euler number formulation by Zukauskas et al. as well as existing two-phase friction multiplier models. It is found that Marchaterre's model for two-phase friction multiplier is applicable to air–water mixtures. The analytical results agree reasonably well with experimental drag coefficients and Euler numbers in air–water mixtures for a sufficiently wide range of pitch mass fluxes and qualities. This model will allow researchers to provide analytical estimates of the drag coefficient, which is related to two-phase damping.

Drag Coefficient and Two-Phase Friction Multiplier on Tube Bundles Subjected to Two-Phase Cross-Flow

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. G. Sim ◽  
W. Mureithi Njuki
Keyword(s):  
Drag Coefficient ◽  
Void Fraction ◽  
Euler Number ◽  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Water Mixture ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Mass Fluxes ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Tube Bundles

An approximate analytical model for upward two-phase cross-flow through horizontal bundles, to predict drag coefficient on a cylinder and two-phase Euler number, has been developed. To verify the model, two sets of experiments were performed for various pitch mass fluxes of air-water mixture with void fraction. The experiments were undertaken with rotated triangular array of cylinders. The pitch to diameter ratio is 1.5 and the cylinder diameter 38 mm. The void fraction model proposed by Feenstra et al. (2000) is utilized to estimate the void fraction for the cross-flow in the tube bundle. An important variable on the drag coefficient is the two-phase friction multiplier. An empirical formulation of non dimensional pressure drop (Euler number) for single phase flow in tube bundles was proposed by Zukauskas et al. (1988) and two-phase friction multiplier in duct flow was formulated by various researchers. Considering the formulations, the present model was developed. It is found that Marchaterre’s model (1961) for two-phase friction multiplier is applicable to air-water mixtures. The analytical results agree well with experimental drag coefficients and Euler numbers in air-water mixtures for a sufficiently wide range of pitch mass fluxes and qualities. This model will allow researcher to provide analytical estimates of the drag coefficient, which is related to two-phase damping.

scholarly journals On Damping and Fluidelastic Instability in a Tube Bundle Subjected to Two-Phase Cross-Flow

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquin E. Moran ◽  
David S. Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Flow Regime ◽  
Void Fraction ◽  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Damping Ratio ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Phase Changes ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Fluidelastic Instability

An experimental study was conducted to investigate damping and fluidelastic instability in tube arrays subjected to two-phase cross-flow. The purpose of this research was to improve our understanding of these phenomena and how they are affected by void fraction and flow regime. The working fluid used was Freon 11, which better models steam-water than air-water mixtures in terms of vapour-liquid mass ratio as well as permitting phase changes due to pressure fluctuations. The damping measurements were obtained by “plucking” the monitored tube from outside the test section using electromagnets. An exponential function was fitted to the tube decay trace, producing consistent damping measurements and minimizing the effect of frequency shifting due to fluid added mass fluctuations. The void fraction was measured using a gamma densitometer, introducing an improvement over the Homogeneous Equilibrium Model (HEM) in terms of density and velocity predictions. It was found that the Capillary number, when combined with the two-phase damping ratio (interfacial damping), shows a well defined behaviour depending on the flow regime. This observation can be used to develop a better methodology to normalize damping results. The fluidelastic results agree with previously presented data when analyzed using the HEM and the half-power bandwidth method. The interfacial velocity is suggested for fluidelastic studies due to its capability for collapsing the fluidelastic data. The interfacial damping was introduced as a tool to include the effects of flow regime into the stability maps.

Vibration Excitation Forces in a Normal Triangular Tube Bundle Subjected to Two-Phase Cross Flow

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. S. Perrot ◽  
N. W. Mureithi ◽  
M. J. Pettigrew ◽  
G. Ricciardi
Keyword(s):  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Random Excitation ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Constant Frequency ◽  
Fluid Forces ◽  
Drag Forces ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Drag And Lift ◽  
Lift And Drag

This paper presents test results of vibration forces in a normal triangular tube bundle subjected to air-water cross-flow. The dynamic lift and drag forces were measured with strain gage instrumented cylinders. The array has a pitch-to-diameter ratio of 1.5, and the tube diameter is 38 mm. A wide range of void fraction and fluid velocities were tested. The experiments revealed significant forces in both the drag and lift directions. Constant frequency and quasi-periodic fluid forces were found in addition to random excitation. These forces were analyzed and characterized to understand their origins. The forces were found to be dependent on the position of the cylinder within the bundle. The results are compared with those obtained with flexible cylinders in the same tube bundle and to those for a rotated triangular tube bundle. These comparisons reveal the influence of quasi-periodic forces on tube motions.

Effect of Void Fraction on Vibrational Behavior of Tubes in Tube Bundle Under Two-Phase Cross Flow

1997 ◽  
Vol 119 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Y. Lian ◽  
G. Noghrehkar ◽  
A. M. C. Chan ◽  
M. Kawaji
Keyword(s):  
Void Fraction ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Damping Ratio ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Vibration Measurement ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Vibrational Behavior

The effects of local two-phase flow parameters on the vibrational behavior of tubes have been studied in an in-line 5 × 20 tube bundle subjected to air-water cross-flow. One of the tubes was flexibly mounted and instrumented for vibration measurement and the others were rigid. Parameters obtained include local void fraction fluctuations, RMS amplitude of void fraction fluctuations, void fraction distributions across the tube bundle, flow regimes based on probability density function of void fraction signals, damping ratio, and tube vibration response as a function of mass flux, void fraction and dynamic pressure. Damping and tube vibration amplitude in two-phase flow have been found to be closely related to the RMS amplitudes of the local void fraction fluctuations and dynamic pressure fluctuations, respectively.

An Approximate Damping Model for Two-Phase Cross-Flow in Horizontal Tube Bundles

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. G. Sim
Keyword(s):  
Void Fraction ◽  
Present Model ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Horizontal Tube ◽  
Lower Envelope ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Semiempirical Approach ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Flow Through ◽  
Damping Model

An approximate analytical model, to predict the two-phase damping for upward cross-flow through horizontal bundles, has been developed. This model will allow researches to provide analytical estimates of the damping ratios. The existing semiempirical approach by Pettigrew and Taylor (2003) was approximated by taking the lower envelope of the damping data. To estimate the void fraction for the cross-flow, the void fraction model proposed by Feenstra etc (2000) is utilized. The development of the present damping model stemmed from the two-phase multiplier of pressure loss and the momentum flux of the two-phase flow. The important variables on the damping are identified. The results of the present model agree well with experimental damping ratios in air-mixtures for a sufficiently wide range of pitch mass ratio, quality and p/d ratios. It has also shown predictive capability for steam-water mixtures and Freon 11.

Fluidelastic Instability and Work-Rate Measurements of Steam-Generator U-Tubes in Air–Water Cross-Flow

2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. P. Janzen ◽  
E. G. Hagberg ◽  
M. J. Pettigrew ◽  
C. E. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Void Fractions ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Fluidelastic Instability ◽  
Out Of Plane ◽  
Plane Direction ◽  
First Time ◽  
Support Work

The dynamic response of U-tubes to two-phase cross-flow has been studied in tests involving a simplified U-tube bundle with a set of flat-bar supports at the apex, subjected to air–water cross-flow over the mid-span region. Tube vibration and the interaction between tubes and supports were measured over a wide range of void fractions and flow rates, for three different tube-to-support clearances. The vibration properties and tube-to-support work-rates could be characterized in terms of the relative influence of fluidelastic instability and random-turbulence excitation. For the first time, in a U-bend tube bundle with liquid or two-phase flow, fluidelastic instability was observed both in the out-of-plane and in the in-plane direction. This raises the possibility of higher-than-expected tube-to-support work-rates for U-tubes restrained by flat bars, particularly if fluidelastic instability, random turbulence and loose supports combine adversely.

Vibration of Tube Bundles in Two-Phase Cross-Flow: Part 3—Turbulence-Induced Excitation

1989 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 488-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. E. Taylor ◽  
I. G. Currie ◽  
M. J. Pettigrew ◽  
B. S. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Void Fraction ◽  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Vibration Response ◽  
Experimental Program ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Design Guideline ◽  
Tube Bundles ◽  
Vibration Responses ◽  
Flow Part

An extensive experimental program was carried out to study the vibration behavior of tube bundles subjected to two-phase cross-flow. Turbulence-induced excitation is discussed in Part 3 of this series of three papers. Random vibration response to turbulence-induced excitation is a significant vibration mechanism in heat exchanger tube bundles subjected to two-phase cross-flow. The vibration responses of centrally located tubes in four tube bundle configurations subjected to air-water cross-flow was measured. The results are presented in the form of a normalized forced-excitation spectrum which can be used as a design guideline over a void fraction range from 25 percent to 99 percent and over a practical range of flow rates. The data are further analyzed to determine the dependence of the vibration response on Reynolds number, void fraction and frequency. Measurements taken on a single tube, a row of tubes and on tubes having varying end conditions were used to assist in interpreting the bundle data.

Vibration of Tube Bundles Subjected to Two-Phase Cross-Flow

1985 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Pettigrew ◽  
J. H. Tromp ◽  
J. Mastorakos
Keyword(s):  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Elastic Instability ◽  
Steam Generators ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Vibration Excitation ◽  
Mass Fluxes ◽  
Excitation Mechanisms ◽  
Shell And Tube

Two-phase cross-flow exists in many shell-and-tube heat exchangers such as condensers, reboilers and nuclear steam generators. Thus we are conducting a comprehensive program to study tube bundle vibrations subjected to two-phase cross-flow. This paper presents the results of experiments on a normal-triangular and a normal-square tube bundle, both of p/d = 1.47. The bundles were subjected to air-water mixtures to simulate realistic vapor qualities and mass fluxes. Vibration excitation mechanisms were deduced from vibration response measurements. Results on damping, hydrodynamic mass, fluid-elastic instability and random turbulence excitation in two-phase cross-flow are presented.

scholarly journals Numerical Prediction of Two-Phase Flow through a Tube Bundle Based on Reduced-Order Model and a Void Fraction Correlation

Entropy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1355
Author(s):  
Claire Dubot ◽  
Cyrille Allery ◽  
Vincent Melot ◽  
Claudine Béghein ◽  
Mourad Oulghelou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Void Fraction ◽  
Grassmann Manifold ◽  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Horizontal Tube ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Tube Bundles ◽  
Flow Through ◽  
Phase Mixture

Predicting the void fraction of a two-phase flow outside of tubes is essential to evaluate the thermohydraulic behaviour in steam generators. Indeed, it determines two-phase mixture properties and affects two-phase mixture velocity, which enable evaluating the pressure drop of the system. The two-fluid model for the numerical simulation of two-phase flows requires interaction laws between phases which are not known and/or reliable for a flow within a tube bundle. Therefore, the mixture model, for which it is easier to implement suitable correlations for tube bundles, is used. Indeed, by expressing the relative velocity as a function of slip, the void fraction model of Feenstra et al.and Hibiki et al. developed for upward cross-flow through horizontal tube bundles is introduced and compared. With the method suggested in this paper, the physical phenomena that occur in tube bundles are taken into consideration. Moreover, the tube bundle is modelled using a porous media approach where the Darcy–Forchheimer term is usually defined by correlations found in the literature. However, for some tube bundle geometries, these correlations are not available. The second goal of the paper is to quickly compute, in quasi-real-time, this term by a non-intrusive parametric reduced model based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition. This method, named Bi-CITSGM (Bi-Calibrated Interpolation on the Tangent Subspace of the Grassmann Manifold), consists in interpolating the spatial and temporal bases by ITSGM (Interpolation on the Tangent Subspace of the Grassmann Manifold) in order to define the solution for a new parameter. The two developed methods are validated based on the experimental results obtained by Dowlati et al. for a two-phase cross-flow through a horizontal tube bundle.

Vibration of a Normal Triangular Tube Bundle Subjected to Two-Phase Freon Cross Flow

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Pettigrew ◽  
C. E. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Diameter Ratio ◽  
Test Series ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Vibration Behavior ◽  
Void Fractions ◽  
Mass Fluxes

This paper presents the results of a test series to study the vibration behavior of a normal triangular tube bundle subjected to two-phase Freon cross flow. A normal triangular tube bundle of pitch over diameter ratio of 1.5 was tested over a broad range of void fractions and mass fluxes. Fluidelastic instabilities, random turbulence excitation, and damping were investigated. The results were compared with those obtained for a similar tube bundle tested in an air-water cross flow and to those for a rotated triangular bundle similarly tested in Freon.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document