Physics of Hot Crossflow Ingestion in Film Cooling

1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 532-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. McGrath ◽  
J. H. Leylek
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Stokes Equations ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Wall Functions ◽  
Flow Physics ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Compound Angle

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is used to isolate the flow physics responsible for hot crossflow ingestion, a phenomenon that can cause failure of a film cooled gas turbine component. In the gas turbine industry, new compound-angle shaped hole (CASH) geometries are currently being developed to decrease the heat transfer coefficient and increase the adiabatic effectiveness on film cooled surfaces. These new CASH geometries can have unexpected flow patterns that result in hot crossflow ingestion at the film hole. This investigation examines a 15 deg forward-diffused film hole injected streamwise at 35 deg with a compound angle of 60 deg (FDIFF60) and with a length-to-diameter ratio (L/D) of 4.0. Qualitative and quantitative aspects of computed results agreed well with measurements, thus lending credibility to predictions. The FDIFF60 configuration is a good representative of a typical CASH geometry, and produces flow mechanisms that are characteristic of CASH film cooling. FDIFF60 has been shown to have impressive downstream film cooling performance, while simultaneously having undesirable ingestion at the film hole. In addition to identifying the physical mechanisms driving ingestion, this paper documents the effects on ingestion of the blowing ratio, the density ratio, and the film hole Reynolds number over realistic gas turbine ranges of 0.5 to 1.88, 1.6 to 2.0, and 17,350 to 70,000, respectively. The results of this study show that hot crossflow ingestion is caused by a combination of coolant blockage at the film hole exit plane and of crossflow boundary layer vorticity that has been re-oriented streamwise by the presence of jetting coolant. Ingestion results when this re-oriented vorticity passes over the blocked region of the film hole. The density ratio and the film hole Reynolds number do not have a significant effect on ingestion over the ranges studied, but the blowing ratio has a surprising nonlinear effect. Another important result of this study is that the blockage of coolant hampers convection and allows diffusion to transfer heat into the film hole even when ingestion is not present. This produces both an undesirable temperature gradient and high temperature level on the film hole wall itself. Lessons learned about the physics of ingestion are generalized to arbitrary CASH configurations. The systematic computational methodology currently used has been previously documented and has become a standard for ensuring accurate results. The methodology includes exact modeling of flow physics, proper modeling of the geometry including the crossflow, plenum, and film hole regions, a high quality mesh for grid independent results, second order discretization, and the two-equation k–ε turbulence model with generalized wall functions. The steady, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations are solved using a fully elliptic and fully implicit pressure-correction solver with multiblock unstructured and adaptive grid capability and with multigrid convergence acceleration.

scholarly journals Physics of Hot Crossflow Ingestion in Film Cooling

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Lee McGrath ◽  
James H. Leylek
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Stokes Equations ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Wall Functions ◽  
Flow Physics ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Compound Angle

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is used to isolate the flow physics responsible for hot crossflow ingestion, a phenomenon that can cause failure of a film cooled gas turbine component. In the gas turbine industry, new compound-angle shaped hole (CASH) geometries are currently being developed to decrease the heat transfer coefficient and increase the adiabatic effectiveness on film cooled surfaces. These new CASH geometries can have unexpected flow patterns that result in hot crossflow ingestion at the film hole. This investigation examines a 15° forward-diffused cylindrical film hole injected streamwise at 35° with a compound angle of 60° (FDIFF60) and with a length-to-diameter ratio (L/D) of 4.0. Qualitative and quantitative aspects of computed results agreed well with measurements, thus lending credibility to predictions. The FDIFF60 configuration is a good representative of a typical CASH geometry, and produces flow mechanisms that are characteristic of CASH film cooling. FDIFF60 has been shown to have impressive downstream film cooling performance, while simultaneously having undesirable ingestion at the film hole. In addition to identifying the physical mechanisms driving ingestion, this paper documents the effects on ingestion of the blowing ratio, the density ratio, and the film hole Reynolds number over realistic gas turbine ranges of 0.5 to 1.88, 1.6 to 2.0, and 17,350 to 70,000, respectively. The results of this study show that hot crossflow ingestion is caused by a combination of coolant blockage at the film hole exit plane and of crossflow boundary layer vorticity that has been re-oriented streamwise by the presence of jetting coolant: Ingestion results when this re-oriented vorticity passes over the blocked region of the film hole. The density ratio and the film hole Reynolds number do not have a significant effect on ingestion over the ranges studied, but the blowing ratio has a surprising non-linear effect. Another important result of this study is that the blockage of coolant hampers convection and allows diffusion to transfer heat into the film hole even when ingestion is not present. This produces both an undesirable temperature gradient and high temperature level on the film hole wall itself. Lessons learned about the physics of ingestion are generalized to arbitrary CASH configurations. The systematic computational methodology currently used has been previously documented and has become a standard for ensuring accurate results. The methodology includes exact modeling of flow physics, proper modeling of the geometry including the crossflow, plenum, and film hole regions, a high quality mesh for grid independent results, second order discretization, and the two-equation k-ε turbulence model with generalized wall functions. The steady, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations are solved using a fully-elliptical and fully-implicit pressure-correction solver with multi-block unstructured and adaptive grid capability and with multi-grid convergence acceleration.

Influence of Coolant Density on Turbine Platform Film-Cooling With Stator–Rotor Purge Flow and Compound-Angle Holes

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Liu ◽  
Shang-Feng Yang ◽  
Je-Chin Han
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Fundamental Parameters ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Purge Flow ◽  
Cylindrical Holes ◽  
Exit Mach Number ◽  
Compound Angle

A detailed parametric study of film-cooling effectiveness was carried out on a turbine blade platform. The platform was cooled by purge flow from a simulated stator–rotor seal combined with discrete hole film-cooling. The cylindrical holes and laidback fan-shaped holes were accessed in terms of film-cooling effectiveness. This paper focuses on the effect of coolant-to-mainstream density ratio on platform film-cooling (DR = 1 to 2). Other fundamental parameters were also examined in this study—a fixed purge flow of 0.5%, three discrete-hole film-cooling blowing ratios between 1.0 and 2.0, and two freestream turbulence intensities of 4.2% and 10.5%. Experiments were done in a five-blade linear cascade with inlet and exit Mach number of 0.27 and 0.44, respectively. Reynolds number of the mainstream flow was 750,000 and was based on the exit velocity and chord length of the blade. The measurement technique adopted was the conduction-free pressure sensitive paint (PSP) technique. Results indicated that with the same density ratio, shaped holes present higher film-cooling effectiveness and wider film coverage than the cylindrical holes, particularly at higher blowing ratios. The optimum blowing ratio of 1.5 exists for the cylindrical holes, whereas the effectiveness for the shaped holes increases with an increase of blowing ratio. Results also indicate that the platform film-cooling effectiveness increases with density ratio but decreases with turbulence intensity.

Numerical Investigation of Coolant-to-Mainstream Scaling Parameters With Film Cooling on Pressure and Suction Side of a Gas Turbine Blade

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingyu Zeng ◽  
Xueying Li ◽  
Jing Ren ◽  
Hongde Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Momentum Flux ◽  
Velocity Ratio ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Flux Ratio ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Pressure Side ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Adiabatic Effectiveness

Most experiments of blade film cooling are conducted with density ratio lower than that of turbine conditions. In order to accurately model the performance of film cooling under a high density ratio, choosing an appropriate coolant to mainstream scaling parameter is necessary. The effect of density ratio on film cooling effectiveness on the surface of a gas turbine twisted blade is investigated from a numerical point of view. One row of film holes are arranged in the pressure side and two rows in the suction side. All the film holes are cylindrical holes with a pitch to diameter ratio P/d = 8.4. The inclined angle is 30°on the pressure side and 34° on the suction side. The steady solutions are obtained by solving Reynolds-Averaged-Navier-Stokes equations with a finite volume method. The SST turbulence model coupled with γ-θ transition model is applied for the present simulations. A film cooling experiment of a turbine vane was done to validate the turbulence model. Four different density ratios (DR) from 0.97 to 2.5 are studied. To independently vary the blowing ratio (M), momentum flux ratio (I) and velocity ratio (VR) of the coolant to the mainstream, seven conditions (M varying from 0.25 to 1.6 on the pressure side and from 0.25 to 1.4 on the suction side) are simulated for each density ratio. The results indicate that the adiabatic effectiveness increases with the increase of density ratio for a certain blowing ratio or a certain momentum flux ratio. Both on the pressure side and suction side, none of the three parameters listed above can serve as a scaling parameter independent of density ratio in the full range. The velocity ratio provides a relative better collapse of the adiabatic effectiveness than M and I for larger VRs. A new parameter describing the performance of film cooling is introduced. The new parameter is found to be scaled with VR for nearly the whole range.

Effect of Coolant Density on Leading Edge Showerhead Film Cooling Using PSP Measurement Technique

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiou-Jiuan Li ◽  
Shang-Feng Yang ◽  
Je-Chin Han
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Pressure Sensitive ◽  
Cylindrical Holes ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Compound Angle ◽  
Low Speed Wind Tunnel

The density ratio effect on leading edge showerhead film cooling has been studied experimentally using the pressure sensitive paint (PSP) mass transfer analogy method. Leading edge model is a blunt body with a semi-cylinder and an after body. There are two designs: seven-row and three-row of film cooling holes for simulating vane and blade, respectively. The film holes are located at 0 (stagnation row), ±15, ±30, and ±45 deg for seven-row design, and at 0 and ±30 for three-row design. Four film holes configurations are used for both test designs: radial angle cylindrical holes, compound angle cylindrical holes, radial angle shaped holes, and compound angle shaped holes. Coolant to mainstream density ratio varies from DR = 1.0, 1.5, to 2.0 while blowing ratio varies from M = 0.5 to 2.1. Experiments were conducted in a low speed wind tunnel with Reynolds number 100,900 based on mainstream velocity and diameter of the cylinder. The mainstream turbulence intensity near leading edge model is about 7%. The results show the shaped holes have overall higher film cooling effectiveness than cylindrical holes, and radial angle holes are better than compound angle holes, particularly at higher blowing ratio. Larger density ratio makes more coolant attach to the surface and increases film protection for all cases. Radial angle shaped holes provides best film cooling at higher density ratio and blowing ratio for both designs.

Effect of Blowing Ratio in the Near-Stagnation Region of a Three-Row Leading Edge Film Cooling Geometry Using Large Eddy Simulations

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sai Shrinivas Sreedharan ◽  
Danesh K. Tafti
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Large Eddy Simulations ◽  
Stagnation Region ◽  
Stagnation Line ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Adiabatic Effectiveness ◽  
Compound Angle

Computational studies are carried out using Large Eddy Simulations (LES) to investigate the effect of coolant to mainstream blowing ratio in a leading edge region of a film cooled vane. The three row leading edge vane geometry is modeled as a symmetric semi-cylinder with a flat afterbody. One row of coolant holes is located along the stagnation line and the other two rows of coolant holes are located at ±21.3° from the stagnation line. The coolant is injected at 45° to the vane surface with 90° compound angle injection. The coolant to mainstream density ratio is set to unity and the freestream Reynolds number based on leading edge diameter is 32000. Blowing ratios (B.R.) of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 are investigated. It is found that the stagnation cooling jets penetrate much further into the mainstream, both in the normal and lateral directions, than the off-stagnation jets for all blowing ratios. Jet dilution is characterized by turbulent diffusion and entrainment. The strength of both mechanisms increases with blowing ratio. The adiabatic effectiveness in the stagnation region initially increases with blowing ratio but then generally decreases as the blowing ratio increases further. Immediately downstream of off-stagnation injection, the adiabatic effectiveness is highest at B.R. = 0.5. However, further downstream the larger mass of coolant injected at higher blowing ratios, in spite of the larger jet penetration and dilution, increases the effectiveness with blowing ratio.

Effect of High Freestream Turbulence on Flowfields of Shaped Film Cooling Holes

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert P. Schroeder ◽  
Karen A. Thole
Keyword(s):  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Turbulence Intensity ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Vortex Pair ◽  
Lateral Spreading ◽  
Freestream Turbulence ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Turbine Airfoils ◽  
Film Cooling Holes

Shaped film cooling holes have become a standard geometry for protecting gas turbine components. Few studies, however, have reported flowfield measurements for moderately-expanded shaped holes and even fewer have reported on the effects of high freestream turbulence intensity relevant to gas turbine airfoils. This study presents detailed flowfield and adiabatic effectiveness measurements for a shaped hole at freestream turbulence intensities of 0.5% and 13%. Test conditions included blowing ratios of 1.5 and 3 at a density ratio of 1.5. Measured flowfields revealed a counter-rotating vortex pair and high jet penetration into the mainstream at the blowing ratio of 3. Elevated freestream turbulence had a minimal effect on mean velocities and rather acted by increasing turbulence intensity around the coolant jet, resulting in increased lateral spreading of coolant.

Influence of Coolant Density on Turbine Blade Film-Cooling With Compound-Angle Shaped Holes

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Liu ◽  
Shang-Feng Yang ◽  
Je-Chin Han
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Momentum Flux ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Flux Ratio ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Shaped Hole ◽  
Compound Angle

Adiabatic film-cooling effectiveness is examined systematically on a typical high pressure turbine blade by varying three critical flow parameters: coolant blowing ratio, coolant-to-mainstream density ratio, and freestream turbulence intensity. Three average coolant blowing ratios 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0; three coolant density ratios 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0; two turbulence intensities 4.2% and 10.5%, are chosen for this study. Conduction-free pressure sensitive paint (PSP) technique is used to measure film-cooling effectiveness. Three foreign gases — N2 for low density, CO2 for medium density, and a mixture of SF6 and Argon for high density are selected to study the effect of coolant density. The test blade features 45° compound-angle shaped holes on the suction side and pressure side, and 3 rows of 30° radial-angle cylindrical holes around the leading edge region. The inlet and the exit Mach number are 0.27 and 0.44, respectively. Reynolds number based on the exit velocity and blade axial chord length is 750,000. Results reveal that the PSP is a powerful technique capable of producing clear and detailed film effectiveness contours with diverse foreign gases. As blowing ratio exceeds the optimum value, it induces more mixing of coolant and mainstream. Thus film-cooling effectiveness reduces. Greater coolant-to-mainstream density ratio results in lower coolant-to-mainstream momentum and prevents coolant to lift-off; as a result, film-cooling increases. Higher freestream turbulence causes effectiveness to drop everywhere except in the region downstream of suction side. Results are also correlated with momentum flux ratio and compared with previous studies. It shows that compound shaped hole has the greatest optimum momentum flux ratio, and then followed by axial shaped hole, compound cylindrical hole, and axial cylindrical hole.

Film Cooling of Compound Angle Upstream Sister Holes

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sana Abd Alsalam ◽  
Bassam Jubran
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Turbulence Modeling ◽  
Stokes Equations ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Navier Stokes Equations ◽  
Cooling Performance ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Simple Strategy ◽  
Compound Angle

Abstract This study introduces a novel and simple strategy; compound angle upstream sister holes (CAUSH) to increase film cooling performance of the cylindrical hole by combining two techniques: Sister holes; (two small round holes placed upstream the primary hole) and compound angle hole. Whereas the upstream sister holes were injected at several compound angles β = 0°, 45°, 75°, and 90°, while the main hole was injected to the streamwise direction at 35° on a flat plate. FLUENT-ANSYS code was used to perform the simulation by solving the 3D Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes Equations. The capability of three types of k-ε turbulence modeling combined with the enhanced wall treatment is investigated to predict the film cooling performance of sister holes. A detailed computational analysis of the cooling performance of the (CAUSH) and the flow field was done at a density ratio equal to two (D.R = 2) and four blowing ratios M = 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 to predict the centerline and laterally averaged film cooling performance. The centerline effectiveness results showed that the highest cooling performance from the examined (CAUSH) was obtained at β = 0°, 45°, and 90° for low and high blowing ratio, the highest laterally averaged film cooling performance was captured at β = 0° and 90° for all tested blowing ratios. Also, the results indicated that the upstream sister hole with 90° compound angle holes has the best overall film cooling effectiveness while the worst performance is attained at β = 75°.

Interaction of Flow and Film-Cooling Effectiveness Between Double-Jet Film-Cooling Holes With Various Spanwise Distances

2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaxu Yao ◽  
Jin Xu ◽  
Ke Zhang ◽  
Jiang Lei ◽  
Lesley M. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Flat Plate ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Vortex Pair ◽  
Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Two Jets ◽  
Compound Angle

The interaction of flow and film-cooling effectiveness between jets of double-jet film-cooling (DJFC) holes on a flat plate is studied experimentally. The time-averaged flow field in several axial positions (X/d = −2.0, 1.0, and 5.0) is obtained through a seven-hole probe. The downstream film-cooling effectiveness on the flat plate is measured by pressure sensitive paint (PSP). The inclination angle (θ) of all the holes is 35 deg, and the compound angle (β) is ±45 deg. Effects of the spanwise distance (p = 0, 0.5d, 1.0d, 1.5d, and 2.0d) between the two interacting jets of DJFC holes are studied, while the streamwise distance (s) is kept as 3d. The blowing ratio (M) varies as 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0. The density ratio (DR) is maintained at 1.0. Results show that the interaction between the two jets of DJFC holes has different effects at different spanwise distances. For a small spanwise distance (p/d = 0), the interaction between the jets presents a pressing effect. The downstream jet is pressed down and kept attached to the surface by the upstream one. The effectiveness is not sensitive to blowing ratios. For mid-spanwise distances (p/d = 0.5 and 1.0), the antikidney vortex pair dominates the interaction and pushes both of the jets down, thus leading to better coolant coverage and higher effectiveness. As the spanwise distance becomes larger (p/d ≥ 1.5), the pressing effect almost disappears, and the antikidney vortex pair effect is weaker. The jets separate from each other and the coolant coverage decreases. At a higher blowing ratio, the interaction between the jets of DJFC holes happens later.

scholarly journals A Detailed Analysis of Film–Cooling Physics: Part I — Streamwise Injection With Cylindrical Holes

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dibbon K. Walters ◽  
James H. Leylek
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Stokes Equations ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Layer Model ◽  
Flow Physics ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Two Layer Model

A previously documented systematic computational methodology is implemented and applied to a jet–in–crossflow problem in order to document all of the pertinent flow physics associated with a film–cooling flowfield. Numerical results are compared to experimental data for the case of a row of three–dimensional, inclined jets with length–to–diameter ratios similar to a realistic film–cooling application. A novel vorticity based approach is included in the analysis of the flow physics. Particular attention has been paid to the downstream coolant structures and to the source and influence of counter–rotating vortices in the crossflow region. It is shown that the vorticity in the boundary layers within the film hole is primarily responsible for this secondary motion. Important aspects of the study include: (1) a systematic treatment of the key numerical issues, including accurate computational modeling of the physical problem, exact geometry and high quality grid generation techniques, higher–order numerical discretization, and accurate evaluation of turbulence model performance; (2) vorticity–based analysis and documentation of the physical mechanisms of jet–crossflow interaction and their influence on film–cooling performance; (3) a comparison of computational results to experimental data; and (4) comparison of results using a two–layer model near–wall treatment versus generalized wall functions. Solution of the steady, time–averaged Navier–Stokes equations were obtained for all cases using an unstructured/adaptive grid, fully explicit, time–marching code with multi–grid, local time stepping, and residual smoothing acceleration techniques. For the case using the two–layer model, the solution was obtained with an implicit, pressure–correction solver with multi–grid. The three–dimensional test case was examined for two different film–hole length–to–diameter ratios of 1.75 and 3.5, and three different blowing ratios, from 0.5 to 2.0. All of the simulations had a density ratio of 2.0, and an injection angle of 35°. An improved understanding of the flow physics has provided insight into future advances to film–cooling configuration design. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of the two–layer turbulence model are highlighted for this class of problems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document