Protection of Patient Autonomy via Consumer Protection Litigation: The Israeli Eltroxin Class Action as a Case Study

Theoria ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Gidron ◽  
Elad Schild
Keyword(s):  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Patient Autonomy ◽  
Class Action

TANGGUNG JAWAB PERBANKAN DALAM KASUS PEMBOBOLAN DANA NASABAH (Studi Pembobolan Deposito milik PT. Elnusa, Tbk)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
Thessa Anial John
Keyword(s):  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Case Study Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Public Funds ◽  
The Public ◽  
Study Approach ◽  
Banking Service ◽  
The Law ◽  
Research Show

<p>Abstract</p><p>This article aims to study the bank’s responsibility towards fraud against customer with a case study of Bank Mega Fraud against PT. Elnusadeposito funds. This research is a normative legal research using constitutional and case study approach. The result of this research show that Bank Mega liquefyPT. Elnusadeposito funds carelessly without PT.Elnusa consent is an act against the law. Bank Mega hasfailed to fulfil it’s responsibility towardsthe customer as regulated Article 37 B paragraph (1) UndangUndang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 concerning banking service that stipulate every bank must guarantee the public funds deposited in the bank concerned The action of Bank Mega has caused losses both material and immaterial loss so that Bank Mega has to give responsibility and compensation for damage and consumer loss according to Article 19 paragraph (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 regarding consumer protection.</p><p>Keywords: Responsibility; prudential principles; banks; and customers.</p><p>Abstrak</p><p>Artikelini bertujuan mengkaji tanggung jawab perbankan terhadap pembobolan dana nasabah dengan</p><p>studi kasus terhadap Bank Mega dalam kasus pembobolan dana deposito PT.Elnusa, Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan melakukan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus.Berdasarkan hasil dari penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa tindakan Bank Mega mencairkan dana deposito milik PT.Elnusa secara tidak hati-hati dan tanpa sepengetahuan PT. Elnusa merupakan tindakan yang melanggar hukum. Bank Mega telah tidak memenuhi kewajibannya terhadap nasabah sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 37 B ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan yang menyebutkan bahwa setiap bank wajib menjamin dana masyarakat yang disimpan pada bank yang bersangkutan. Tindakan Bank Mega telah menimbulkan kerugian baik materiil maupun immateriil sehingga Bank Mega selaku pelaku usaha berdasarkan Pasal 19 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen bertanggung jawab untuk memberikan ganti rugi atas kerusakan, pencemaran, dan/atau kerugian konsumen akibat mengkonsumsi barang dan/atau jasa yang dihasilkan.</p><p>Kata Kunci: Tanggung jawab; prinsip kehati-hatian; bank; dan nasabah.</p>

Recent Case Developments in Health Law

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-167
Author(s):  
Stacy Clark
Keyword(s):  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Wholesale Price ◽  
Pharmaceutical Products ◽  
Class Action ◽  
Insurance Companies ◽  
District Court ◽  
Cancer Drug ◽  
Average Wholesale Price ◽  
Pharmaceutical Pricing

In September 2009, the First Circuit Court of Appeals decided Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, part of the class action suit known as In re Pharmaceutical Industry Average Wholesale Price Litigation. The First Circuit upheld a Massachusetts District Court finding that AstraZeneca violated Massachusetts’ consumer protection laws by manipulating the “average wholesale price” of its physician-administered injectable cancer drug Zoladex, leading to overpayment by the government, third-party payers, and consumers. This case, which highlights the persistent tension between pharmaceutical pricing flexibility and consumer protection, has important implications for similar pending class actions.Between 1991 and 2003, Medicare, as well as many private insurance companies, pegged reimbursement for certain pharmaceutical products to a national “average wholesale price” (AWP) for each drug. Although the amended 1991 Medicare Part B regulations3 that introduced the term “average wholesale price” failed to define it explicitly, there is some indication in the legislative history that AWP was intended to refer to the prices that physicians and pharmacists actually pay to the drug manufacturers.

Rethinking the Relationship Between Public Regulation and Private Litigation: Evidence from Securities Class Action in China

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 333-361
Author(s):  
Robin Hui Huang
Keyword(s):  
The United States ◽  
Class Action ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Securities Law ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Public And Private Enforcement ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
The U.S

Abstract China has a civil procedure for collective litigation, which is dubbed Chinese-style class action, as it differs from the U.S.-style class action in some important ways. Using securities class action as a case study, this Article empirically examines both the quantity and quality of reported cases in China. It shows that the number of cases is much lower than expected, but the percentage of recovery is significantly higher than that in the United States. Based on this, the Article casts doubt on the popular belief that China should adopt the U.S.-style class action, and sheds light on the much-debated issue concerning the relationship between public and private enforcement of securities law. The Article also discusses the future prospects of securities class action in China in light of some recent developments which may provide its functional equivalents, including the regulator-brokered compensation fund and public interest group litigation.

scholarly journals Gugatan Class Action dalam Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen

to-ra ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Wiwik Sri Widiarty
Keyword(s):  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Class Action ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Consumer Protection Act ◽  
Civil Lawsuit ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Many ◽  
The Right ◽  
First Time

Abstract   First time of the many cases that harm the interests of consumers as well as to the need for information and the development of knowledge in the field of law today is known as the class action, the Government, and Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat give attention to consumers in Indonesia. Provisions governing Class Action contained in Law No. 32 Year 2009 on Protection And Environmental Management, and Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, and also law PERMA No.1 Year 2002 on Proces Class Action. In order to demand justice for the consumer losses caused by the business, the consumer has the right to demand their rights as set out in the Consumer Protection Act, that the dispute mechanism can be chosen voluntarily by the parties to the dispute, namely through the courts or out of court. The class action suit is a civil lawsuit filed by a group of people who have an interest in a similar problem, either one or more of their members to sue or be sued as representative of the group without any members of the group are involved directly in the judicial process. In connection with this there is the benefit of a class action lawsuit in consumer disputes in court, but to fight for their rights, the principle litigants with simple, fast, and low cost, and the determinants that be a reason to be eligible class action, both in practice as well as in its implementation.   Kata Kunci: Gugatan Class Action

scholarly journals PENINGKATAN KOMPETENSI PENYUSUNAN PENELITIAN TINDAKAN KELAS (PTK) MELALUI DIKLAT MODEL IN ON IN

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Endang Fadli
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Research Paper ◽  
Class Action ◽  
Technical Training ◽  
Case Study Method ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Research Action

AbstrakThis paper presents the results of research on Substantive Technical Training for Promoting Competence Research Action Class VIII (DTSPK PTK VIII). The objective is to examine the implementation of DTSPK PTK VIII in on in model, more specifically to know the improvement of competence of compilation of Class Action Research paper (PTK). This research was conducted using case study method with the data collected through questionnaire, interview, and documentation. This research concludes that the competence of DTSPK PTK VIII participants in the preparation of paper of PTK after following the in on model is good meaning DTSPK PTK VIII in on model can increase the competence of writing papers of PTK. AbstrakTulisan ini menyajikan hasil penelitian pada Diklat Teknis Substantif Peningkatan Kompetensi Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Angkatan VIII (DTSPK PTK VIII). Tujuannya adalah mengkaji pelaksanaan DTSPK PTK VIII model in on in yang lebih khususnya untuk mengetahui peningkatan kompetensi penyusunan karya tulis Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK). Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode studi kasus, yang data-datanya dikumpulkan melalui angket, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa kompetensi peserta DTSPK PTK VIII pada penyusunan karya tulis PTK setelah mengikuti diklat model in on in adalah baik. MakaDTSPK PTK VIII model in on in dapat meningkatkan kompetensi penyusunan karya tulis PTK.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document