Developmental characteristics of urinary coproporphyrin I/(I + III) ratio

2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 974-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Kunikata ◽  
Hitoshi Okada ◽  
Susumu Itoh ◽  
Takashi Kusaka
2014 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Benz-de Bretagne ◽  
Noël Zahr ◽  
Amélie Le Gouge ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Hulot ◽  
Caroline Houillier ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 350-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Sakai ◽  
Y Niinuma ◽  
S Yanagihara ◽  
K Ushio

Abstract We describe a method of determining coproporphyrin I, III, and I plus III in urine by "high-performance" liquid chromatography. Urine is simply injected after dilution with an equal volume of glacial acetic acid. Some urinary coproporphyrin apparently binds zinc without acetic acid treatment. The working linear range of coproporphyrin concentrations is 10 to 2000 micrograms/L of urine. The sensitivity of the method is sufficient to detect as little as 10 micrograms of coproporphyrins per liter of urine. Analytical recoveries for both coproporphyrins were 96.7-106%. Results by the present method and those by an extraction method (Br J Ind Med 31:72-74, 1974) correlate well (r = 0.975). Mean (and range) coproporphyrin I, III, and I plus III concentrations in urine from normal subjects are 33.7 (7-75), 28.6 (0-130), and 62.2 (7-174) micrograms/L, respectively.


2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 750-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiyomi Egami ◽  
Kiichiro Morita ◽  
Takashi Ohya ◽  
Youhei Ishii ◽  
Yushiro Yamashita ◽  
...  

1947 ◽  
Vol 168 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-144
Author(s):  
Samuel Schwartz ◽  
Violet Hawkinson ◽  
Sanford Cohen ◽  
Cecil James Watson

Author(s):  
Yosuke Suzuki ◽  
Yuri Sasamoto ◽  
Teruhide Koyama ◽  
Chisato Yoshijima ◽  
Ayako Oda ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 016235322110235
Author(s):  
Claudia A. Cornejo-Araya ◽  
Leonie Kronborg

Adopting a constructivist grounded theory approach, 91 students from Years 9 to 11, in gifted educational programs from three schools in Melbourne, nominated their inspiring teachers. Eleven teachers, who received the highest number of nominations, were invited to an interview and an observation of their teaching. The emerged theoretical construct was identified as “Opening new possibilities: Inspiring teachers of gifted and highly able students,” which is further explained through three main categories: Being a knowledgeable and passionate teacher, creating an academically safe learning environment, and teaching beyond and above the regular curriculum. In addition, the theoretical process was explained through three phases: Expanding knowledge and understanding, Fostering positive attitudes, and Encouraging students to take action. Contextual determinants were considered to analyze and report the findings: students’ developmental characteristics, school culture, curriculum, and gifted educational provisions. Findings are discussed in the light of existing literature, as well as study limitations and ideas for future research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document