How Power Distance Interacts with Culture and Status to Explain Intra‐ and Intercultural Negotiation Behaviors: A Multilevel Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 192-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meina Liu
2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meina Liu ◽  
Lin Zhu ◽  
Ioana A. Cionea

This study examines whether and how intercultural negotiation dyads that vary in culture-role combinations experience different negotiation processes and outcomes. Participants completed an employment contract negotiation with a culturally different counterpart. Results indicated that high-status, high-power distance negotiators paired with low-status, low-power distance negotiators experienced more anger, placed less emphasis on cooperative goals, used less priority information exchange, and, consequently, gained less joint profits than high-status, low-power distance negotiators paired with low-status, high-power distance negotiators. Theoretical and practical implications of the study are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 135-141
Author(s):  
Kenneth D. Locke

Abstract. Person–job (or needs–supplies) discrepancy/fit theories posit that job satisfaction depends on work supplying what employees want and thus expect associations between having supervisory power and job satisfaction to be more positive in individuals who value power and in societies that endorse power values and power distance (e.g., respecting/obeying superiors). Using multilevel modeling on 30,683 European Social Survey respondents from 31 countries revealed that overseeing supervisees was positively associated with job satisfaction, and as hypothesized, this association was stronger among individuals with stronger power values and in nations with greater levels of power values or power distance. The results suggest that workplace power can have a meaningful impact on job satisfaction, especially over time in individuals or societies that esteem power.


1994 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex B. Caldwell
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne van Gils ◽  
Niels Van Quaquebeke ◽  
Jan Borkowski ◽  
Daan van Knippenberg

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine L. Stanek ◽  
Lisa M. Perez ◽  
Scott M. Brooks ◽  
Jack W. Wiley

2017 ◽  
Vol 109 (7) ◽  
pp. 915-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Ming Chiu ◽  
Bonnie Wing-Yin Chow ◽  
Sung Wook Joh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document