Patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of zirconia bar compared to cobalt chromium bar retaining mandibular implant overdenture: Across‐over study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilan Y. Altonbary ◽  
Radwa M.K. Emera
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Masticatory Performance ◽  
Cobalt Chromium ◽  
Implant Overdenture

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Ball Attachment Systems in Implant Retained- and Supported-Overdentures: A Three- to Five-Year Retrospective Examination

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Luca Ortensi ◽  
Matteo Martinolli ◽  
Carlo Borromeo ◽  
Francesco Mattia Ceruso ◽  
Marco Gargari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Technical Complications ◽  
Implant Overdenture ◽  
Biological Outcomes ◽  
Retrospective Examination

Purpose: To evaluate implant and prosthetic survival rates, complications, patient satisfaction, and biological outcomes of patients rehabilitated with a ball attachment system for implant retained- and supported-overdentures (IOV), which was in function for 3 to 5 years. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated data collected from patients treated between April 2001 and May 2018 with IOV on splinted and non-splinted implants and a ball attachment system. Patients were followed for 36 to 206 months (mean follow-up was 128.1 ± 51.9 months). Data were collected at the 3- and 5-year follow-up examination. Outcome measures were implant and prosthetic survival rates, technical complications, marginal bone loss (MBL), oral health impact profile (OHIP), and periodontal parameters (bleeding on probing and plaque index). Results: A total of 46 patients (16 males and 30 females) with 124 implants were included in this study. Twenty-five implant-retained overdentures were delivered on 53 unsplinted implants, while the other 21 patients received an implant-supported overdentures and the implants were splinted. At the five-year follow-up examination, one implant and one prosthesis failed in the unsplinted group, resulting in a cumulative survival rate of 97.8% at the patient level. Two minor technical complications were experienced. Conclusions: Implant overdenture retained or supported by ball attachment systems showed high implant and prosthetic survival and success rates. A low number of complications, high patient satisfaction, and successful biological parameters were experienced in the mid-term follow-up. Data need to be confirmed by further randomized trials.

scholarly journals Biomechanical Aspects of Various Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Review

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 3248
Author(s):  
Bharat Mirchandani ◽  
Ting Zhou ◽  
Artak Heboyan ◽  
Sirasa Yodmongkol ◽  
Borvornwut Buranawat
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Stress Distribution ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Lateral Force ◽  
Tissue Response ◽  
Implant Overdenture ◽  
Technological Developments ◽  
Plastic Resin

There have been considerable recent technological developments for implant overdenture attachments. This study presents an overview of the biomechanical and biomolecular aspects of various attachments for implant overdenture. Available articles on attachments for implant overdenture were reviewed from January 1980 to August 2021 in the ScienceDirect, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Web of Science resources, and relevant studies were included in this study. We focused on the following topics: attachment systems, retention of various attachments, stress distribution with different attachments, the design and fabrication of attachments, digital techniques in overdenture attachments, and the effects of attachments in peri-implant health. We found that plastic resin is commonly used for ball and bar attachments, whereas nylon resin is commonly used in locator attachments. The locator system offers a valuable attachment option for implant-retained overdenture. Attachment retention reduces while lateral force increases with implant inclination in overdenture. The higher the retention of an overdenture attachment, the higher the transferred stresses. Additionally, clip loading produces more stress in implants and precision elements than bar-retained dentures. As such, we conclude that the ball and locator systems the best overdenture systems due to their superior tissue response, survival rate, and patient satisfaction.

Mandibular Implant Overdentures: Treatment and Medico-Legal Considerations

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 28-35
Author(s):  
Charlotte Stilwell
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Minimum Standard ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Edentulous Mandible ◽  
Implant Overdenture

The concept of a two-implant overdenture as the minimum standard of care or first choice treatment for the edentulous mandible was first proposed in 2002 and has since been backed by an overwhelming body of evidence supporting greater patient satisfaction and improved quality of life. This article examines the implant overdenture concept and its various options and discusses best practice from both the patient's and a medico-legal standpoint.

scholarly journals Evaluation of patient satisfaction and masticatory performance in mandible single implant-assisted overdenture

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Sanjeev Mittal ◽  
Swati Kashyap ◽  
Navneet Sharma ◽  
Urvashi Sukhija ◽  
Mohit Kamra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Masticatory Performance ◽  
Single Implant

scholarly journals One-year prospective clinical study comparing patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of mandibular overdentures supported by one versus two implants

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
André Gustavo Paleari ◽  
Norberto Martins de Oliveira Junior ◽  
Danny Omar Mendoza Marin ◽  
Larissa Santana Rodriguez ◽  
João Neudenir Arioli Filho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Masticatory Performance ◽  
One Year
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document